# Your page scores 46 out of 100 for sameness against the 4 competitors you named.

Parts of your page are genuinely your own — but how the page looks is where you and Snyk start to sound the same.

- **Your page:** https://www.aikido.dev/
- **Compared against:** Snyk (snyk.io), XBOW (xbow.com), Socket (socket.dev), Black Duck (blackduck.com)
- **Sameness Index:** 46 — Half shared
- **Ownable share:** 8% (of 40% distinctive)
- **Report:** https://grader.wynter.com/c/aikido-dev-TtrfHMA

**How you compare · vs 366 SaaS sites** — 10 points less same than the average SaaS site. The average SaaS site scores 56; you scored 46. You are less same than 300 of the 366 SaaS sites. The best-differentiated site in the set is at 6.
_A single check can move several points between runs; the benchmark averages up to eight sites per category._

## 1. Sameness Index

| Category | Weight | Score | What it means |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Messaging | 30% | 66 | The most expensive kind of sameness. A buyer cannot tell what job you do that the others do not. |
| Claims | 30% | 25 | Every shared claim is a line already read on another tab. Cut the ones nobody owns and spend the space on something they cannot. |
| Features | 15% | 61 | Expected in a mature category, and the least alarming of the six. Feature parity is normal; leading with it is the mistake. |
| Proof | 10% | 35 | Same kinds of proof as everyone means the proof stops working as proof. It is scored on the kind of evidence, not on which customers are named. |
| Structure | 10% | 25 | The generic SaaS template — hero, logos, three-feature grid, testimonial, CTA. Familiar is not the same as memorable. |
| Visual | 5% | 68 | Weighted lowest on purpose: buyers rarely decide on this. Worth knowing, rarely worth fixing first. |

**Half shared** — About half your claims are also on competitor pages.

## 2. Closest competitors

| Competitor | Echoes your claims |
| --- | --- |
| Snyk | 71% |
| Black Duck | 48% |
| XBOW | 33% |
| Socket | 33% |

_Measured from your side: the share of what YOU say that each competitor also says, weighted by where you put it. This is not a Sameness Index — a competitor can echo most of your page and still score low on its own index by saying a great deal you do not._

## 3. Ownable share

**The share of your own page's claim space that is yours to keep.** This is not the inverse of the Sameness Index — it is measured on your claims alone, so the two do not add up to 100 and are not meant to.

Only 8% of your page is unique, relevant to how buyers choose, and hard to copy. That is the number to move.

- **Distinctive message share:** 40% — prominent space spent on claims no competitor makes.
- **Ownable share:** 8% — the part of that which is also relevant to how buyers choose and hard to copy.

## 4. Where you sound like everyone else

Most of your set makes each of these and you are spending prominent space on them, ranked by how much. **These are not necessarily lines to delete** — some of what a page has to say is unavoidably shared, and claims about what kind of product you are were left out of this list for exactly that reason. The question each one raises is whether it has earned its space.

- **large customer base as proof** (Hero, 100% of the set) — also on Snyk, XBOW, Socket, Black Duck
  - _"Trusted by 150k+ orgs"_
- **customer satisfaction and testimonials as proof** (Hero, 100% of the set) — also on Snyk, XBOW, Socket, Black Duck
  - _"4.7/5 rating"_
  - Said your way: nobody else makes this exact claim, but everyone occupies the territory.
- **less noise, more accurate prioritized findings** (Hero, 75% of the set) — also on XBOW, Socket, Black Duck
  - _"Every module in one platform, filtered by real risk"_
  - Said your way: nobody else makes this exact claim, but everyone occupies the territory.
- **faster remediation and detection** (Section, 100% of the set) — also on Snyk, XBOW, Socket, Black Duck
  - _"<4min to detect malware attacks"_
- **faster remediation and detection** (Section, 100% of the set) — also on Snyk, XBOW, Socket, Black Duck
  - _"<3min from finding to fix"_
  - Said your way: nobody else makes this exact claim, but everyone occupies the territory.
- **built for developers without hindering security** (Section, 75% of the set) — also on Snyk, Socket, Black Duck
  - _"Instead of adding another UI to check, Aikido integrates with the tools you already use. We'll notify you when it's important"_
- **deep context and attack-surface mapping capability** (Section, 75% of the set) — also on Snyk, XBOW, Black Duck
  - _"Autonomously attack your running applications, APIs and infrastructure to prove what's actually exploitable, before others do"_
- **built for developers without hindering security** (Section, 75% of the set) — also on Snyk, Socket, Black Duck
  - _"Block vulnerable changes before they merge, with inline guidance and autofix"_

## 5. Buried gold

Unique, relevant, and sitting in body copy. The cheapest wins here — you already have the differentiation and the page hides it.

- **Equips security teams to keep pace with developers** (Body, 0% of the set)
  - _"Give your security team the tools to keep up with your developers"_
- **Provides open-source patches to clear CVE backlog** (Body, 0% of the set)
  - _"Burn down your CVE backlog with our open-source patches"_

## 6. Claim inventory

| Claim | Type | Placement | Common | Sayability | Relevant | Ownership |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Large number of organizations use the product | proof | Hero | 100% | anyone | yes | Commodity |
| High customer satisfaction rating | proof | Hero | 0% | anyone | no | Unique for now |
| Findings prioritized by real risk across modules | capability | Hero | 0% | anyone | yes | Unique for now |
| Autonomous security that finds and fixes without humans | outcome | Hero | 25% | some | yes | Contested |
| One unified platform covering all application security | category | Hero | 25% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| Fast time to first results after signup | quality | Hero | 25% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| Customer says automation and accuracy free up teams | proof | Section | 50% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| Detects malware attacks within minutes | outcome | Section | 25% | some | yes | Contested |
| Very short time from finding to fix | outcome | Section | 0% | anyone | yes | Unique for now |
| Integrates into existing developer tools and pipelines | capability | Section | 75% | anyone | yes | Commodity |
| Autonomously attacks running apps to prove exploitability | capability | Section | 50% | some | yes | Contested |
| Blocks vulnerable changes before merge in PRs | capability | Section | 50% | some | yes | Contested |
| Drastically fewer false positives than alternatives | outcome | Section | 50% | some | yes | Contested |
| Modernizes defenses for AI-era development | outcome | Section | 50% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| Builds whole-application context to drive detection | capability | Section | 25% | some | yes | Contested |
| Built for developers while satisfying security teams | segment | Section | 25% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| Real-time visibility into running cloud workloads | capability | Section | 0% | some | yes | Unique and owned |
| Finds and auto-fixes code issues before shipping | capability | Section | 0% | some | yes | Unique and owned |
| Legacy security tools are fragmented and noisy | outcome | Section | 0% | anyone | no | Unique for now |
| Saves developers many hours per week | outcome | Section | 0% | anyone | yes | Unique for now |
| Blocks supply chain attacks on developer machines | capability | Section | 25% | some | yes | Contested |
| Pipeline enforcement without slowing builds | capability | Section | 0% | anyone | yes | Unique for now |
| Works out of the box with no setup or orchestration | quality | Section | 0% | anyone | yes | Unique for now |
| Filters findings by reachability to cut noise | capability | Body | 25% | some | yes | Contested |
| Triage learns custom context from your documentation | capability | Body | 0% | some | no | Unique and owned |
| Enforces security policy across the whole SDLC | capability | Body | 25% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| Agents coach and educate developers to scale the program | capability | Body | 0% | anyone | no | Unique for now |
| Equips security teams to keep pace with developers | outcome | Body | 0% | anyone | yes | Unique for now |
| Puts security on autopilot for non-developer builders | capability | Body | 0% | some | no | Unique and owned |
| Read-only access, no data sharing, no credit card | quality | Body | 25% | anyone | no | Contested |
| Provides open-source patches to clear CVE backlog | capability | Body | 0% | some | yes | Unique and owned |

## What we compared

- **Aikido** (your page) — https://www.aikido.dev/
- **Snyk** — https://snyk.io/
- **XBOW** — https://xbow.com/
- **Socket** — https://www.socket.dev/
- **Black Duck** — https://www.blackduck.com/

## What this does and does not tell you

An AI read each page and wrote down the claims it makes, then grouped the claims that say the same thing. **No score in this report was written by a model** — every number is computed from those groupings in our own code, with the weights shown above.

## The only way to know if it matters

This report can tell you where your messaging overlaps. It cannot tell you whether a buyer would care, or which of your reasons to buy actually land. Put the page in front of real B2B buyers in your target market and ask them.

[Test it with real buyers](https://wynter.com)