# Your page scores 58 out of 100 for sameness against the 4 competitors you named.

Parts of your page are genuinely your own — but what you say you do and who it's for is where you and Domotz start to sound the same.

- **Your page:** https://www.auvik.com/
- **Compared against:** Domotz (domotz.com), Paessler PRTG (paessler.com), SolarWinds (solarwinds.com), LogicMonitor (logicmonitor.com)
- **Sameness Index:** 58 — Half shared
- **Ownable share:** 8% (of 8% distinctive)
- **Report:** https://grader.wynter.com/c/auvik-com-zMC5GtA

**How you compare · vs 8 IT service management category leaders** — 1 point more same than the average IT service management category leader. The average IT service management category leader scores 57; you scored 58. You are less same than 3 of the 8 IT service management category leaders. The best-differentiated site in the set is at 44.
_A single check can move several points between runs; the benchmark averages up to eight sites per category._

## 1. Sameness Index

| Category | Weight | Score | What it means |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Messaging | 30% | 75 | The most expensive kind of sameness. A buyer cannot tell what job you do that the others do not. |
| Claims | 30% | 64 | Every shared claim is a line already read on another tab. Cut the ones nobody owns and spend the space on something they cannot. |
| Features | 15% | 60 | Expected in a mature category, and the least alarming of the six. Feature parity is normal; leading with it is the mistake. |
| Proof | 10% | 20 | Same kinds of proof as everyone means the proof stops working as proof. It is scored on the kind of evidence, not on which customers are named. |
| Structure | 10% | 28 | The generic SaaS template — hero, logos, three-feature grid, testimonial, CTA. Familiar is not the same as memorable. |
| Visual | 5% | not measured | Not enough on either page to compare. |

**Half shared** — About half your claims are also on competitor pages.

## 2. Closest competitors

| Competitor | Same | Band |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Domotz | 82 | Interchangeable |
| SolarWinds | 61 | Mostly the same |
| Paessler PRTG | 54 | Half shared |
| LogicMonitor | 36 | Mostly your own |

_Measured from your side: how much of what YOU say each competitor also says, weighted by where you put it._

## 3. Ownable share

**The share of your own page's claim space that is yours to keep.** This is not the inverse of the Sameness Index — it is measured on your claims alone, so the two do not add up to 100 and are not meant to.

Only 8% of your page is unique, relevant to how buyers choose, and hard to copy. That is the number to move.

- **Distinctive message share:** 8% — prominent space spent on claims no competitor makes.
- **Ownable share:** 8% — the part of that which is also relevant to how buyers choose and hard to copy.

---

## The rest of this report is locked

The full claim inventory, the commodity claims eating your hero space, your buried differentiation and the positioning breakdown are behind the six-digit code we emailed. Enter it at https://grader.wynter.com/c/auvik-com-zMC5GtA and download again.

## What we compared

- **Auvik** (your page) — https://www.auvik.com/
- **Domotz** — https://www.domotz.com/
- **Paessler PRTG** — https://www.paessler.com/prtg
- **SolarWinds** — https://www.solarwinds.com/
- **LogicMonitor** — https://www.logicmonitor.com/

## What this does and does not tell you

An AI read each page and wrote down the claims it makes, then grouped the claims that say the same thing. **No score in this report was written by a model** — every number is computed from those groupings in our own code, with the weights shown above.

## The only way to know if it matters

This report can tell you where your messaging overlaps. It cannot tell you whether a buyer would care, or which of your reasons to buy actually land. Put the page in front of real B2B buyers in your target market and ask them.

[Test it with real buyers](https://wynter.com)