# Your page scores 57 out of 100 for sameness against the 2 competitors you named.

Parts of your page are genuinely your own — but the features you list is where you and Relativity start to sound the same.

- **Your page:** https://www.everlaw.com/
- **Compared against:** Relativity (relativity.com), DISCO (csdisco.com)
- **Sameness Index:** 57 — Half shared
- **Ownable share:** 19% (of 38% distinctive)
- **Report:** https://grader.wynter.com/c/everlaw-com-iIm2C6U

**How you compare · vs 366 SaaS sites** — 1 point more same than the average SaaS site. The average SaaS site scores 56; you scored 57. You are less same than 176 of the 366 SaaS sites. The best-differentiated site in the set is at 6.
_A single check can move several points between runs; the benchmark averages up to eight sites per category._

> With 2 competitors, commonness can only take 3 distinct values. The figures are honest at that resolution and no finer.

## 1. Sameness Index

| Category | Weight | Score | What it means |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Messaging | 30% | 79 | The most expensive kind of sameness. A buyer cannot tell what job you do that the others do not. |
| Claims | 30% | 55 | Every shared claim is a line already read on another tab. Cut the ones nobody owns and spend the space on something they cannot. |
| Features | 15% | 83 | Expected in a mature category, and the least alarming of the six. Feature parity is normal; leading with it is the mistake. |
| Proof | 10% | 31 | Same kinds of proof as everyone means the proof stops working as proof. It is scored on the kind of evidence, not on which customers are named. |
| Structure | 10% | 0 | The generic SaaS template — hero, logos, three-feature grid, testimonial, CTA. Familiar is not the same as memorable. |
| Visual | 5% | 32 | Weighted lowest on purpose: buyers rarely decide on this. Worth knowing, rarely worth fixing first. |

**Half shared** — About half your claims are also on competitor pages.

## 2. Closest competitors

| Competitor | Echoes your claims |
| --- | --- |
| Relativity | 61% |
| DISCO | 54% |

_Measured from your side: the share of what YOU say that each competitor also says, weighted by where you put it. This is not a Sameness Index — a competitor can echo most of your page and still score low on its own index by saying a great deal you do not._

## 3. Ownable share

**The share of your own page's claim space that is yours to keep.** This is not the inverse of the Sameness Index — it is measured on your claims alone, so the two do not add up to 100 and are not meant to.

19% of your page is unique, relevant and defensible. That is real, and it is a minority of what you say.

- **Distinctive message share:** 38% — prominent space spent on claims no competitor makes.
- **Ownable share:** 19% — the part of that which is also relevant to how buyers choose and hard to copy.

## 4. Where you sound like everyone else

Most of your set makes each of these and you are spending prominent space on them, ranked by how much. **These are not necessarily lines to delete** — some of what a page has to say is unavoidably shared, and claims about what kind of product you are were left out of this list for exactly that reason. The question each one raises is whether it has earned its space.

- **one unified platform for all legal data** (Section, 100% of the set) — also on Relativity, DISCO
  - _"One evidentiary system of record, wherever your team works"_
- **quantified customer results as proof** (Section, 100% of the set) — also on Relativity, DISCO
  - _"$140,000 - Energy company saves six figures using Everlaw"_
- **finds facts and insights faster** (Section, 100% of the set) — also on Relativity, DISCO
  - _"Capture near-instant insights in even the most complex data"_
- **one unified platform for all legal data** (Section, 100% of the set) — also on Relativity, DISCO
  - _"Prevent data sprawl, maintain confidence in outputs, and ensure the security of your litigation data"_
- **human services, support and expertise available** (Section, 100% of the set) — also on Relativity, DISCO
  - _"Get more from Everlaw, with dedicated customer success, unlimited training, and responsive support"_
- **automates manual legal workflows** (Section, 100% of the set) — also on Relativity, DISCO
  - _"Everlaw Legal Holds: Automate preservation, eliminate spreadsheets, and maintain complete defensibility—all from one platform"_
- **quantified customer results as proof** (Section, 100% of the set) — also on Relativity, DISCO
  - _"98.2% Recall - Dinsmore & Shohl achieves near perfect recall"_
  - Said your way: nobody else makes this exact claim, but everyone occupies the territory.
- **quantified customer results as proof** (Section, 100% of the set) — also on Relativity, DISCO
  - _"36% More Effective - Everlaw Coding Suggestions outperforms in first-pass review"_
  - Said your way: nobody else makes this exact claim, but everyone occupies the territory.

## 5. Buried gold

Unique, relevant, and sitting in body copy. The cheapest wins here — you already have the differentiation and the page hides it.

- **Supports virtually any file type** (Body, 0% of the set)
  - _"Everlaw supports almost any type of data you encounter, from simple emails to the most obscure file types"_

## 6. Claim inventory

| Claim | Type | Placement | Common | Sayability | Relevant | Ownership |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AI purpose-built for legal/litigation work | category | Hero | 100% | anyone | yes | Commodity |
| One unified platform for the whole legal data lifecycle | capability | Section | 100% | anyone | yes | Commodity |
| Quantified customer cost savings from the platform | proof | Section | 100% | anyone | yes | Commodity |
| Surfaces insights fast across complex data | outcome | Section | 100% | anyone | yes | Commodity |
| Avoids data sprawl by keeping data in one place | outcome | Section | 50% | some | yes | Contested |
| Dedicated customer success, training and support | capability | Section | 50% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| Legal hold automation with defensible audit trail | capability | Section | 50% | some | yes | Contested |
| 98.2% recall achieved by a named firm | proof | Section | 0% | some | yes | Unique and owned |
| AI coding suggestions 36% more effective in first-pass review | proof | Section | 0% | some | yes | Unique and owned |
| Analytics and trial preparation tooling included | capability | Section | 0% | anyone | yes | Unique for now |
| Legal holds enacted in 15 minutes | proof | Section | 0% | anyone | yes | Unique for now |
| Named customer achieved 3x faster review | proof | Section | 0% | anyone | yes | Unique for now |
| AI outputs grounded, cited and defensible in evidence | quality | Section | 50% | some | yes | Contested |
| Natural-language Q&A over case documents | capability | Section | 50% | some | yes | Contested |
| Secure, governed environment for sensitive legal data | quality | Section | 50% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| Works across in-app, API and custom integrations | capability | Section | 50% | some | yes | Contested |
| Performance holds up at extreme matter scale | quality | Section | 0% | some | yes | Unique and owned |
| Reduces public records request backlogs | outcome | Section | 0% | some | yes | Unique and owned |
| Easy to use and quick to get started | quality | Body | 100% | anyone | yes | Commodity |
| Manage testimony, designations and exhibits | capability | Body | 50% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| Partner ecosystem provides added capacity and expertise | proof | Body | 50% | anyone | no | Contested |
| Templates and workflows standardize team output | capability | Body | 0% | anyone | no | Unique for now |
| FedRAMP-certified government/public records platform | proof | Body | 50% | some | yes | Contested |
| Supports virtually any file type | capability | Body | 0% | anyone | yes | Unique for now |
| Top-rated on third-party review sites | proof | Body | 0% | anyone | no | Unique for now |

## What we compared

- **Everlaw** (your page) — https://www.everlaw.com/
- **Relativity** — https://relativity.com/
- **DISCO** — https://csdisco.com/

## What this does and does not tell you

An AI read each page and wrote down the claims it makes, then grouped the claims that say the same thing. **No score in this report was written by a model** — every number is computed from those groupings in our own code, with the weights shown above.

## The only way to know if it matters

This report can tell you where your messaging overlaps. It cannot tell you whether a buyer would care, or which of your reasons to buy actually land. Put the page in front of real B2B buyers in your target market and ask them.

[Test it with real buyers](https://wynter.com)