Sameness Index · 3 sites compared

Your page scores 58 out of 100 for sameness against the 2 competitors you named.

https://imaginarium.agency/

01

Your verdict

58
Sameness · vs 2 named
How is this calculated?

Your page is half shared.

About half of what your page says, Zion & Zion also says. The average of the 8 Marketing agencies sites scored is 60.

Benchmarked against Marketing agencies (the category you chose).
Sameness Index on a 0 to 100 scale, from distinctive at 0 to interchangeable at 100. This page scores 58. Zion & Zion scores 69. tmp (The Marketing Practice) scores 74. The category avg is 60.

Each named site is scored the same way, against the other 2 in this set, so its tick means the same as your marker. The dashed line is the frozen benchmark average.

  1. Less same than average

    The average Marketing agencies category leader scores 60; you scored 58.

    You are 2 points less same than the average Marketing agencies category leader.

  2. Closest overlap: Zion & Zion

    Of the 2 sites you named, Zion & Zion echoes the most of what your page says: 84% of it, weighted by placement. Scored the same way you were, against the rest of the set, Zion & Zion's own Sameness Index is 69. Those are different measures: the first is overlap with your page, the second is how same Zion & Zion's whole page is.

    Zion & Zion is the competitor you sound most like.

  3. Room to own more

    25% of your claim space is ownable: unique, relevant, and hard to copy. 4 of those claims sit in body copy, where few readers reach them.

    25% is ownable, and 4 buried opportunities could help you stand out more.

Do this first

Three changes worth testing first.

Chosen by rule from the comparison with Zion & Zion and tmp (The Marketing Practice): the shared claim taking your most prominent space, then the claims only you make that sit too low on the page to be read. Each one links to its claim card.

  1. “Our client knew that enterprise cybersecurity is oversaturated; we knew how to cut through category noise with a bold omnichannel launch”

    Zion & Zion and tmp (The Marketing Practice) all say it too. Buyers may still need it, but shared ground cannot carry your section — move it lower and give that space to something only you can say.

    Table stakes
    Most of the set says this too.
  2. “Creative & AI-led production”

    Nobody in the set says this. It sits in body copy, where few readers reach it — worth testing higher up the page; only buyers can tell you whether it lands.

    Surface
    Yours alone. Test it higher up.
  3. “Data strategy & architecture”

    A claim that is yours alone, filed in body copy. Try it where it will be read before the shared claims are, and let buyers tell you if it moves them.

    Surface
    Yours alone. Test it higher up.

Try these changes, then test them with real buyers.

This measures overlap. Whether buyers notice is a different question, and only they can answer it.

02

What you can own

Claims only you make, that buyers weigh, and that competitors can’t easily copy.

25% of your page’s claim space is yours to keep.

25%Yours to keep39%Unique but weak36%A competitor says it too
Why this is not 100 minus the Sameness Index

The index is a weighted composite across six categories, including page structure and visuals. This bar is measured on your claims alone, weighted by where each one sits on the page. Different denominators, so the two never add to 100 and are not meant to.

Already leading with · 4

  1. Agentic AI media planning and buying

    “Agentic paid media”

  2. AI-enabled go-to-market marketing capability

    “AI-enabled GTM”

  3. Turns ABM campaigns into a measurable growth system

    “The home of Performance ABM”

  4. Certified platform partnerships give clients data and access advantages

    “Certified preferred partnerships across intelligence and media — so our brand partners get better data, seamless orchestration, and faster access than the…”

Buried in body copy · 4

  1. Data strategy and architecture service

    “Data strategy & architecture”

  2. Go-to-market and growth strategy service

    “GTM strategy”

  3. Revenue operations service

    “RevOps”

  4. Creative production accelerated by AI

    “Creative & AI-led production”

03

Where you blend in

Territory you spend prominent space on that the set also occupies. Not every line is one to delete — the question is whether it has earned the space, or whether something only you can say should be there instead.

  • Commodity · 100%Table stakesSection
    Better business outcomes and growth
    • “The result is better business outcomes”

    Zion & Zion and tmp (The Marketing Practice) all cover this territory. Buyers may need to hear it, but in your section it spends the first impression on shared ground.

    They say
    • Zion & Zion“Our success comes from a deep understanding of our client's business and the development of strong strategic insights to make marketing and advertising…”
    • tmp (The Marketing Practice)“$13M pipeline. Built on trust.”
  • Commodity · 100%Table stakesSection
    Case studies as proof of results
    • “Our client knew that enterprise cybersecurity is oversaturated; we knew how to cut through category noise with a bold omnichannel launch”
    • “Our client knew that mental availability is scarce in crowded digital channels; we knew how to reach and connect with executive audiences using CTV”

    You say this 2 different ways.

    Common ground with Zion & Zion and tmp (The Marketing Practice). Say it if buyers need it — lower on the page, where it is not the thing they read first.

    They say
    • Zion & Zion“Case study: Catalyzing Growth for a Global Risk Management Company through Data Cleanliness”
    • tmp (The Marketing Practice)“Setting sail from a sea of sameness (Nutanix)”
  • Commodity · 100%Table stakesSection
    Full-service breadth across marketing disciplines
    • “We create distinctive brands and memorable creative that help buyers remember you long after the moment has passed”
    • “The Imaginarium is a full-service B2B and ABM growth agency combining advanced analytics, account-based marketing, media, and creative”

    You say this 2 different ways.

    Zion & Zion and tmp (The Marketing Practice) make the same claim. It cannot set you apart, so it should not carry the section.

    They say
    • Zion & Zion“Our approach to providing marketing services is straightforward and rooted in research, data, creative, analytics, marketing technology, and customer data…”
    • tmp (The Marketing Practice)“Brand to demand. End to end.”
  • Commodity · 100%Table stakesSection
    Named customers as proof
    • “You're in great company (Visa, Wolters Kluwer, Bombora, Hulu, H&R Block, Phoenix Suns, Cavender's, Wiley, Instructure)”

    A buyer comparing tabs sees this on Zion & Zion and tmp (The Marketing Practice). Yours earns nothing by repeating it up top; it can live lower down.

    They say
    • Zion & Zion“High Growth Clients Trust Us”
    • tmp (The Marketing Practice)“Worked with Reltio, AWS, Palo Alto Networks, ServiceNow, Splunk, Commvault, Verizon, Capgemini, Thomson Reuters”
  • Commodity · 100%Table stakesSection
    Third-party recognition and rankings
    • “Nationally recognized cross-disciplinary agency”

    Zion & Zion and tmp (The Marketing Practice) got here first as far as a buyer can tell. Keep the fact for readers who need it; move the position to a claim only your page can make. Nobody else uses your exact words, but everyone is on the ground. Nobody else makes this exact claim, but everyone occupies the territory — lead with the specific, not the generic.

    They say
    • Zion & Zion“Zion & Zion is ranked among the top Arizona agencies by various sources”
    • tmp (The Marketing Practice)“Ranked top 10 B2B Agency. Top 5 for both Brand and Demand.”
  • Contested · 50%SharpenHero
    AI-powered capability
    • “Agentic paid media”
    • “AI-enabled GTM”

    You say this 2 different ways.

    tmp (The Marketing Practice) is on this territory too (50% of the set). It narrows the field without winning it — make it specific enough that it cannot be said of them. Nobody else uses your exact words, but everyone is on the ground. Nobody else makes this exact claim, but everyone occupies the territory — lead with the specific, not the generic.

    They say
    • tmp (The Marketing Practice)“Our AI-enabled tmp.ROI tool benchmarks your performance against your market and provides bespoke ROI recommendations.”
  • Contested · 50%KeepHero
    Data turned into decisions and intelligence
    • “The home of Performance ABM”
    • “optimism isn't a leap of faith, but the consequence of knowing more”
    • “The Imaginarium turns every impression into intelligence”

    You say this 3 different ways.

    Zion & Zion say what they are and who they are for, as every page in a category must. Keep it — it is orientation, not differentiation.

    They say
    • Zion & Zion“It is our use of technology and our relentless pursuit of knowledge that sets us apart from our competitors”
  • Contested · 50%KeepHero
    Senior marketing leaders do the work
    • “The Imaginarium is a team of senior marketing leaders working to redefine what modern marketing can accomplish for ambitious brands”

    Every page has to name its category and audience, and Zion & Zion do too. Keep the line; just do not expect it to do any differentiating.

    They say
    • Zion & Zion“a level of personalized service that always involves our senior team”
  • Contested · 50%SharpenSection
    Practical, executable work not just ideas
    • “Hospitality: We're here to do the heavy lifting for you, anticipate what's next, and make you look good”
    • “Your business needs more than ideas. You need a playbook.”
    • “Excellence: We are committed to delivering work that's nothing short of excellent”
    • “Accountability: We own all parts of the value creation process: details, follow-through, and outcomes”

    You say this 4 different ways.

    Zion & Zion is on this territory too (50% of the set). It narrows the field without winning it — make it specific enough that it cannot be said of them.

    They say
    • Zion & Zion“We deliver exceptional thinking”
  • Contested · 50%SharpenSection
    Serves many industries and company sizes
    • “Regardless of your revenue or technology stack, we have the strategic and technical know-how to guide you forward”

    Shared with Zion & Zion. Sharpen it to the thing only you do here, or it reads as a claim any of you could make. Nobody else uses your exact words, but everyone is on the ground. Nobody else makes this exact claim, but everyone occupies the territory — lead with the specific, not the generic.

    They say
    • Zion & Zion“In a relationship with some innovative B2B and B2C clients”
04

Claim-by-claim evidence

Every claim on your page (25)
What the columns mean
Claim
The grouped claim, then your exact line beneath it.
Type
What kind of claim it is: category, segment, outcome, capability, quality or proof.
Placement
Where it sits on your page: hero, section or body copy. Hero claims weigh most in the index.
Same claim
Share of the competitors making this exact claim. Drives ownership and ownable share.
Same territory
Share of the competitors with any claim in the same buyer-facing territory. This is what the index is scored on.
Sayability
Whether a competitor could truthfully make the same claim: anyone could, copyable with effort, or hard to copy.
Relevant
Whether buyers decide on this. A unique claim nobody buys on is not ownable.
Ownership
Commodity: 60% or more of the set says it. Contested: 20–59%. Unique: under 20%, owned when it is also hard to copy.

Tap a column to sort by it; tap again to reverse. Sorted by Same claim, highest first.

  • Full-service integrated agency across all disciplines
    “The Imaginarium is a full-service B2B and ABM growth agency combining advanced analytics, account-based marketing, media, and creative”
    categorySectionsame claim 100%same territory 100%Anyone could say it
    Commodity
    Also on Zion & Zion, tmp (The Marketing Practice)
  • Recognizable enterprise brands as clients
    “You're in great company (Visa, Wolters Kluwer, Bombora, Hulu, H&R Block, Phoenix Suns, Cavender's, Wiley, Instructure)”
    proofSectionsame claim 100%same territory 100%Copyable with effort
    Commodity
    Also on Zion & Zion, tmp (The Marketing Practice)
  • Decisions grounded in knowledge, not guesswork
    “optimism isn't a leap of faith, but the consequence of knowing more”
    qualityHerosame claim 50%same territory 50%Anyone could say itnot a buying criterion
    Contested
    Also on Zion & Zion
  • Work staffed by senior marketing leaders
    “The Imaginarium is a team of senior marketing leaders working to redefine what modern marketing can accomplish for ambitious brands”
    categoryHerosame claim 50%same territory 50%Anyone could say it
    Contested
    Also on Zion & Zion
  • Case study: omnichannel launch cut through saturated category
    “Our client knew that enterprise cybersecurity is oversaturated; we knew how to cut through category noise with a bold omnichannel launch”
    proofSectionsame claim 50%same territory 100%Anyone could say itnot a buying criterion
    Contested
    Also on tmp (The Marketing Practice)
  • Committed to excellent work
    “Excellence: We are committed to delivering work that's nothing short of excellent”
    qualitySectionsame claim 50%same territory 50%Anyone could say itnot a buying criterion
    Contested
    Also on Zion & Zion
  • Delivers better business outcomes
    “The result is better business outcomes”
    outcomeSectionsame claim 50%same territory 100%Anyone could say it
    Contested
    Also on Zion & Zion
  • Digital transformation servicegrouping uncertain
    “Digital transformation”
    capabilityBodysame claim 50%same territory 100%Anyone could say itnot a buying criterion
    Contested
    Also on Zion & Zion
  • Serves many industry verticals
    “Our clients span B2B technology, healthcare, logistics, financial services, retail, construction, ecommerce, and professional services”
    segmentBodysame claim 50%same territory 50%Anyone could say itnot a buying criterion
    Contested
    Also on Zion & Zion
  • Agentic AI media planning and buying
    “Agentic paid media”
    capabilityHerosame claim 0%same territory 50%Copyable with effort
    Unique and owned
  • AI-enabled go-to-market marketing capability
    “AI-enabled GTM”
    capabilityHerosame claim 0%same territory 50%Copyable with effort
    Unique and owned
  • Turns ABM campaigns into a measurable growth system
    “The home of Performance ABM”
    categoryHerosame claim 0%same territory 50%Copyable with effort
    Unique and owned
  • Turns data signals into actionable intelligence
    “The Imaginarium turns every impression into intelligence”
    outcomeHerosame claim 0%same territory 50%Anyone could say it
    Unique for now
  • Anticipates client needs and does the heavy lifting
    “Hospitality: We're here to do the heavy lifting for you, anticipate what's next, and make you look good”
    qualitySectionsame claim 0%same territory 50%Anyone could say itnot a buying criterion
    Unique for now
  • Case study: reaching executives via CTV
    “Our client knew that mental availability is scarce in crowded digital channels; we knew how to reach and connect with executive audiences using CTV”
    proofSectionsame claim 0%same territory 100%Anyone could say itnot a buying criterion
    Unique for now
  • Certified platform partnerships give clients data and access advantages
    “Certified preferred partnerships across intelligence and media — so our brand partners get better data, seamless orchestration, and faster access than the…”
    proofSectionsame claim 0%same territory 0%Copyable with effort
    Unique and owned
  • Clients need an executable playbook, not ideas
    “Your business needs more than ideas. You need a playbook.”
    qualitySectionsame claim 0%same territory 50%Anyone could say itnot a buying criterion
    Unique for now
  • Distinctive brand and memorable creative that aids recall
    “We create distinctive brands and memorable creative that help buyers remember you long after the moment has passed”
    capabilitySectionsame claim 0%same territory 100%Anyone could say it
    Unique for now
  • Nationally recognized agency
    “Nationally recognized cross-disciplinary agency”
    proofSectionsame claim 0%same territory 100%Anyone could say itnot a buying criterion
    Unique for now
  • Owns accountability for outcomes end to end
    “Accountability: We own all parts of the value creation process: details, follow-through, and outcomes”
    qualitySectionsame claim 0%same territory 50%Anyone could say itnot a buying criterion
    Unique for now
  • Works with any revenue size or tech stack
    “Regardless of your revenue or technology stack, we have the strategic and technical know-how to guide you forward”
    capabilitySectionsame claim 0%same territory 50%Anyone could say itnot a buying criterion
    Unique for now
  • Creative production accelerated by AI
    “Creative & AI-led production”
    capabilityBodysame claim 0%same territory 50%Copyable with effort
    Unique and owned
  • Data strategy and architecture service
    “Data strategy & architecture”
    capabilityBodysame claim 0%same territory 100%Anyone could say it
    Unique for now
  • Go-to-market and growth strategy service
    “GTM strategy”
    capabilityBodysame claim 0%same territory 100%Anyone could say it
    Unique for now
  • Revenue operations service
    “RevOps”
    capabilityBodysame claim 0%same territory 100%Anyone could say it
    Unique for now
05

How this was calculated

Sameness measures how much your claims overlap with the sites compared. It does not measure message quality or whether buyers prefer you.

AI-analyzed: an AI read each page on its own and grouped the claims that say the same thing. No score here was written by a model — every number is computed from those groupings in our own code, with the weights below.

How the score is built
The six category scores, their weights, and what a high score in each one means
CategoryWeightYoursWhat a high score means
Messaging
Category framing, who it is for, and the outcome promised
30%64The most expensive kind of sameness. A buyer cannot tell what job you do that the others do not.
Claims
Attribute and benefit claims — speed, ease, quality, ROI
30%50Every shared claim is a line already read on another tab. Cut the ones nobody owns and spend the space on something they cannot.
Features
Capabilities and functions the page lists
15%67Expected in a mature category, and the least alarming of the six. Feature parity is normal; leading with it is the mistake.
Proof
The kinds of evidence offered: customer logos, numbers, testimonials, case studies, badges
10%55Same kinds of proof as everyone means the proof stops working as proof. It is scored on the kind of evidence, not on which customers are named.
Structure
Section order, navigation, CTA language and placement
10%n/aThe generic SaaS template — hero, logos, three-feature grid, testimonial, CTA. Familiar is not the same as memorable.
Visual
Palette family, imagery style, layout patterns
5%47Weighted lowest on purpose: buyers rarely decide on this. Worth knowing, rarely worth fixing first.

Each site was read on its own first, with no knowledge of the others, so your page gets no benefit of the doubt a competitor’s does not. A category nothing could be measured for drops out and the rest are re-weighted, rather than counted as zero.

What we compared (3 pages read)
Your page
The Imaginarium
imaginarium.agency
Competitor
Zion & Zion
zionandzion.com
Competitor
tmp (The Marketing Practice)
tmpb2b.com
What it cannot tell you

The index can find where two pages converge. It cannot say whether a buyer would notice, or which of your reasons to buy actually land. A single check also moves several points between runs, so read the band and the ranking, not the last digit.

Your highest-impact changes

  1. 1
    Table stakesYour section copy says “Our client knew that enterprise cybersecurity is oversaturated; we knew how to cut through category noise wit…”.

    Zion & Zion and tmp (The Marketing Practice) all say it too. Buyers may still need it, but shared ground cannot carry your section — move it lower and give that space to something only you can say.

  2. 2
    Table stakesYour section copy says “Our client knew that mental availability is scarce in crowded digital channels; we knew how to reach and conn…”.

    Keep the fact, lose the position: zion & Zion and tmp (The Marketing Practice) all say it too, and your section is spending its first impression on the same territory as theirs.

  3. 3
    Table stakesYour section copy says “The result is better business outcomes”.

    This is the set's common ground — Zion & Zion and tmp (The Marketing Practice) all say it too. It will not set you apart wherever it sits, and in the section it costs you the one place a distinctive claim would be read.

  4. 4
    Table stakesYour section copy says “We create distinctive brands and memorable creative that help buyers remember you long after the moment has p…”.

    A buyer with three tabs open reads a version of this on every one of them. Say it further down for the readers who need it; the section should carry a claim they will only find here.

  5. 5
    Table stakesYour section copy says “Nationally recognized cross-disciplinary agency”.

    True of you and true of them: Zion & Zion and tmp (The Marketing Practice) all say it too. That is why it decides nothing, and why the section is the wrong place to spend it.

  6. 6
    Table stakesYour section copy says “You're in great company (Visa, Wolters Kluwer, Bombora, Hulu, H&R Block, Phoenix Suns, Cavender's, Wiley, Ins…”.

    In the section: Zion & Zion and tmp (The Marketing Practice) all say it too. Buyers may still need it, but shared ground cannot carry your section — move it lower and give that space to something only you can say.

  7. 7
    Table stakesYour body copy says “Data strategy & architecture”.

    In the body: True of you and true of them: Zion & Zion and tmp (The Marketing Practice) all say it too. That is why it decides nothing, and why the body is the wrong place to spend it.

  8. 8
    Table stakesYour body copy says “GTM strategy”.

    In the body: Keep the fact, lose the position: zion & Zion and tmp (The Marketing Practice) all say it too, and your body is spending its first impression on the same territory as theirs.

  9. 9
    Surface“Creative & AI-led production” is yours alone, and buyers weigh it.

    Nobody in the set says this. It sits in body copy, where few readers reach it — worth testing higher up the page; only buyers can tell you whether it lands.

  10. 10
    Surface“Data strategy & architecture” is yours alone, and buyers weigh it.

    A claim that is yours alone, filed in body copy. Try it where it will be read before the shared claims are, and let buyers tell you if it moves them.

  11. 11
    Surface“GTM strategy” is yours alone, and buyers weigh it.

    No competitor page makes this claim. Today it is in body copy; it is a candidate for the space the table-stakes lines are taking.

  12. 12
    Surface“RevOps” is yours alone, and buyers weigh it.

    The rest of the set has nothing on this ground. Buried in body copy it does no work; higher up it is the one line a comparing buyer cannot find elsewhere.

The only way to know if it matters.

This report can tell you where your messaging overlaps. It cannot tell you whether a buyer would care, or which of your reasons to buy actually land. Put the page in front of real B2B buyers in your target market and ask them.

Test it with real buyers
Trusted by
HubSpotRingCentralShopifyCognismPaddleVeeamRipplingMiro