Your verdict
Your page is half shared.
About half of what your page says, Planview also says. You're less same than 307 of the 366 SaaS sites scored (SaaS avg 56).
Each named site is scored the same way, against the other 3 in this set, so its tick means the same as your marker. The dashed line is the frozen benchmark average.
Less same than average
The average SaaS site scores 56; you scored 45.
You are 11 points less same than the average SaaS site.
Closest overlap: Planview
Of the 3 sites you named, Planview echoes the most of what your page says: 47% of it, weighted by placement. Scored the same way you were, against the rest of the set, Planview's own Sameness Index is 68. Those are different measures: the first is overlap with your page, the second is how same Planview's whole page is.
Planview is the competitor you sound most like.
Room to own more
4% of your claim space is ownable: unique, relevant, and hard to copy. 4 of those claims sit in body copy, where few readers reach them.
4% is ownable, and 4 buried opportunities could help you stand out more.
The verdict is above. Everything you can act on opens with your code.
We emailed you a six-digit code; it is in the subject line. Enter it and four more sections unlock on this page, and the report link lands in your inbox so you can come back to it.
- Do this first — the three changes worth testing, with the claim quoted and the reason
- What you can own — the claims that are yours alone, and the ones buried in body copy
- Where you blend in — shared territory, with the competitors' exact wording beside yours
- Every claim on your page, with how common it is and whether a competitor could copy it
Three changes worth testing first.
Chosen by rule from the comparison with HYPE, Qmarkets and Planview: the shared claim taking your most prominent space, then the claims only you make that sit too low on the page to be read. Confirm your email above and the claim and the reason appear on each one.
- Locked — enter your code to see the claim
The line from your page, who else says it, and what to do about it.
Table stakesMost of the set says this too. - Locked — enter your code to see the claim
The line from your page, who else says it, and what to do about it.
SurfaceYours alone. Test it higher up. - Locked — enter your code to see the claim
The line from your page, who else says it, and what to do about it.
SurfaceYours alone. Test it higher up.
Try these changes, then test them with real buyers.
This measures overlap. Whether buyers notice is a different question, and only they can answer it.
What you can own
Claims only you make, that buyers weigh, and that competitors can’t easily copy.
4% of your page’s claim space is yours to keep.
Why this is not 100 minus the Sameness Index
The index is a weighted composite across six categories, including page structure and visuals. This bar is measured on your claims alone, weighted by where each one sits on the page. Different denominators, so the two never add to 100 and are not meant to.
4 claims pass all three tests, 4 of them filed in body copy. Unlock to see them.
Where you blend in
9 prominent territories on your page are shared with the set, 8 of them by most of it. Unlock to see them with the competitors’ exact wording.
How this was calculated
Sameness measures how much your claims overlap with the sites compared. It does not measure message quality or whether buyers prefer you.
AI-analyzed: an AI read each page on its own and grouped the claims that say the same thing. No score here was written by a model — every number is computed from those groupings in our own code, with the weights below.
How the score is built
| Category | Weight | Yours | What a high score means |
|---|---|---|---|
Messaging Category framing, who it is for, and the outcome promised | 30% | 96 | The most expensive kind of sameness. A buyer cannot tell what job you do that the others do not. |
Claims Attribute and benefit claims — speed, ease, quality, ROI | 30% | 0 | Every shared claim is a line already read on another tab. Cut the ones nobody owns and spend the space on something they cannot. |
Features Capabilities and functions the page lists | 15% | 72 | Expected in a mature category, and the least alarming of the six. Feature parity is normal; leading with it is the mistake. |
Proof The kinds of evidence offered: customer logos, numbers, testimonials, case studies, badges | 10% | 33 | Same kinds of proof as everyone means the proof stops working as proof. It is scored on the kind of evidence, not on which customers are named. |
Structure Section order, navigation, CTA language and placement | 10% | 0 | The generic SaaS template — hero, logos, three-feature grid, testimonial, CTA. Familiar is not the same as memorable. |
Visual Palette family, imagery style, layout patterns | 5% | 43 | Weighted lowest on purpose: buyers rarely decide on this. Worth knowing, rarely worth fixing first. |
Each site was read on its own first, with no knowledge of the others, so your page gets no benefit of the doubt a competitor’s does not. A category nothing could be measured for drops out and the rest are re-weighted, rather than counted as zero.
What we compared (4 pages read)
What it cannot tell you
The index can find where two pages converge. It cannot say whether a buyer would notice, or which of your reasons to buy actually land. A single check also moves several points between runs, so read the band and the ranking, not the last digit.
Your highest-impact changes
- 1Table stakesYour hero copy says “Board-ready reports and agentic intelligence replace slide decks and gut calls”.
HYPE, Qmarkets and Planview all say it too. Buyers may still need it, but shared ground cannot carry your hero — move it lower and give that space to something only you can say.
- 2Table stakesYour hero copy says “Fund, stop, or scale the right initiatives before good ideas become sunk costs”.
Keep the fact, lose the position: hYPE, Qmarkets and Planview all say it too, and your hero is spending its first impression on the same territory as theirs.
- 3Table stakesYour section copy says “Project portfolio management”.
This is the set's common ground — HYPE, Qmarkets and Planview all say it too. It will not set you apart wherever it sits, and in the section it costs you the one place a distinctive claim would be read.
- 4Table stakesYour section copy says “ITONICS Prism is your agentic intelligence to know where to invest, what to stop, and what comes next”.
A buyer with three tabs open reads a version of this on every one of them. Say it further down for the readers who need it; the section should carry a claim they will only find here.
- 5Table stakesYour section copy says “Idea & innovation management”.
True of you and true of them: HYPE and Qmarkets say it too (67% of the set). That is why it decides nothing, and why the section is the wrong place to spend it.
- 6Table stakesYour section copy says “Named category leader by analysts, trusted by auditors”.
In the section: Keep the fact, lose the position: hYPE and Planview say it too (67% of the set), and your section is spending its first impression on the same territory as theirs.
- 7Table stakesYour section copy says “Trusted by global enterprises, verified impact”.
In the section: HYPE and Planview say it too (67% of the set). Buyers may still need it, but shared ground cannot carry your section — move it lower and give that space to something only you can say.
- 8Table stakesYour body copy says “Prioritize projects by customer value, collaborate among cross-functional teams, and accelerate time-to-market”.
In the body: True of you and true of them: HYPE, Qmarkets and Planview all say it too. That is why it decides nothing, and why the body is the wrong place to spend it.
- 9Surface“Define search fields, and Prism creates your prioritized technology radar based on 500M curated signals and l…” is yours alone, and buyers weigh it.
Nobody in the set says this, and there is a structural reason they cannot. It sits in body copy, where few readers reach it — worth testing higher up the page; only buyers can tell you whether it lands.
- 10Surface“Name an industry and set your criteria. Prism scans the field and returns a ranked list of ventures, weighing…” is yours alone, and buyers weigh it.
A claim that is yours alone, filed in body copy. Try it where it will be read before the shared claims are, and let buyers tell you if it moves them.
- 11Surface“Find gaps” is yours alone, and buyers weigh it.
No competitor page makes this claim. Today it is in body copy; it is a candidate for the space the table-stakes lines are taking.
- 12Surface“Validated opportunities, interactive strategic plans, and early risk alerts” is yours alone, and buyers weigh it.
The rest of the set has nothing on this ground. Buried in body copy it does no work; higher up it is the one line a comparing buyer cannot find elsewhere.
The only way to know if it matters.
This report can tell you where your messaging overlaps. It cannot tell you whether a buyer would care, or which of your reasons to buy actually land. Put the page in front of real B2B buyers in your target market and ask them.
