# Your page scores 54 out of 100 for sameness against the 2 competitors you named.

Parts of your page are genuinely your own — but what you say you do and who it's for is where you and Clio start to sound the same.

- **Your page:** https://www.litify.com/
- **Compared against:** Filevine (LOIS) (filevine.com), Clio (clio.com)
- **Sameness Index:** 54 — Half shared
- **Ownable share:** 7% (of 35% distinctive)
- **Report:** https://grader.wynter.com/c/litify-com-6Eh5gXo

**How you compare · vs 366 SaaS sites** — 2 points less same than the average SaaS site. The average SaaS site scores 56; you scored 54. You are less same than 220 of the 366 SaaS sites. The best-differentiated site in the set is at 6.
_A single check can move several points between runs; the benchmark averages up to eight sites per category._

> With 2 competitors, commonness can only take 3 distinct values. The figures are honest at that resolution and no finer.

## 1. Sameness Index

| Category | Weight | Score | What it means |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Messaging | 30% | 85 | The most expensive kind of sameness. A buyer cannot tell what job you do that the others do not. |
| Claims | 30% | 50 | Every shared claim is a line already read on another tab. Cut the ones nobody owns and spend the space on something they cannot. |
| Features | 15% | 68 | Expected in a mature category, and the least alarming of the six. Feature parity is normal; leading with it is the mistake. |
| Proof | 10% | 0 | Same kinds of proof as everyone means the proof stops working as proof. It is scored on the kind of evidence, not on which customers are named. |
| Structure | 10% | 0 | The generic SaaS template — hero, logos, three-feature grid, testimonial, CTA. Familiar is not the same as memorable. |
| Visual | 5% | 67 | Weighted lowest on purpose: buyers rarely decide on this. Worth knowing, rarely worth fixing first. |

**Half shared** — About half your claims are also on competitor pages.

## 2. Closest competitors

| Competitor | Echoes your claims |
| --- | --- |
| Clio | 77% |
| Filevine (LOIS) | 31% |

_Measured from your side: the share of what YOU say that each competitor also says, weighted by where you put it. This is not a Sameness Index — a competitor can echo most of your page and still score low on its own index by saying a great deal you do not._

## 3. Ownable share

**The share of your own page's claim space that is yours to keep.** This is not the inverse of the Sameness Index — it is measured on your claims alone, so the two do not add up to 100 and are not meant to.

Only 7% of your page is unique, relevant to how buyers choose, and hard to copy. That is the number to move.

- **Distinctive message share:** 35% — prominent space spent on claims no competitor makes.
- **Ownable share:** 7% — the part of that which is also relevant to how buyers choose and hard to copy.

## 4. Where you sound like everyone else

Most of your set makes each of these and you are spending prominent space on them, ranked by how much. **These are not necessarily lines to delete** — some of what a page has to say is unavoidably shared, and claims about what kind of product you are were left out of this list for exactly that reason. The question each one raises is whether it has earned its space.

- **AI does substantive multi-step legal work** (Hero, 100% of the set) — also on Filevine (LOIS), Clio
  - _"Brings an enhanced experience, deeper firm-wide intelligence, and true multi-step agentic execution"_
- **Branded AI assistant offering** (Hero, 100% of the set) — also on Filevine (LOIS), Clio
  - _"Introducing LitifyAI Call Intelligence"_
- **Saves time and handles more work without added staff** (Hero, 100% of the set) — also on Filevine (LOIS), Clio
  - _"Helping legal teams move cases forward faster"_
- **AI does substantive multi-step legal work** (Section, 100% of the set) — also on Filevine (LOIS), Clio
  - _"Deploy agents with full context of matters and data to run end-to-end autonomous workflows across the firm"_
- **Saves time and handles more work without added staff** (Section, 100% of the set) — also on Filevine (LOIS), Clio
  - _"Configurable workflows and autonomous agents streamline best practices so you can handle 2X as many matters with the same staff"_
- **Saves time and handles more work without added staff** (Section, 100% of the set) — also on Filevine (LOIS), Clio
  - _"Reduce the time spent on administrative tasks"_
- **AI does substantive multi-step legal work** (Section, 100% of the set) — also on Filevine (LOIS), Clio
  - _"Generate, edit, and manage your documents — all in one place"_
  - Said your way: nobody else makes this exact claim, but everyone occupies the territory.

## 5. Buried gold

Nothing buried — every unique, relevant claim is already prominent.

## 6. Claim inventory

| Claim | Type | Placement | Common | Sayability | Relevant | Ownership |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AI executes multi-step work, not just summarizes | capability | Hero | 100% | some | yes | Commodity |
| Branded AI assistant product introduction | capability | Hero | 50% | anyone | no | Contested |
| Cases move forward faster with AI momentum | outcome | Hero | 50% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| Built on an AI-native platform, not system of record | category | Hero | 0% | anyone | no | Unique for now |
| Converts intake calls and voicemails into structured data | capability | Hero | 0% | some | yes | Unique and owned |
| Intake AI converts more paid leads into clients | outcome | Hero | 0% | anyone | yes | Unique for now |
| Vendor is leading a new era of legal tech | category | Section | 100% | anyone | no | Commodity |
| AI agents act across the whole caseload, not one task | capability | Section | 50% | some | yes | Contested |
| Handle more matters without adding staff | outcome | Section | 50% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| Reduces time spent on administrative work | outcome | Section | 50% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| AI document generation and editing in-platform | capability | Section | 0% | anyone | yes | Unique for now |
| AI-guided intake with lead scoring and pre-fills | capability | Section | 50% | some | yes | Contested |
| Configurable workflows and customizable AI behavior | capability | Section | 50% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| One platform replaces fragmented case systems | capability | Section | 50% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| Open platform with industry-leading security standards | quality | Section | 50% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| Real-time performance visibility and analytics | capability | Section | 50% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| Standardize best practices firm-wide | outcome | Section | 50% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| Access the assistant anywhere: extension, mobile, voice | capability | Section | 0% | some | no | Unique and owned |
| Built on named world-class cloud/AI infrastructure | proof | Section | 0% | some | no | Unique and owned |

## What we compared

- **Litify** (your page) — https://www.litify.com/
- **Filevine (LOIS)** — https://www.filevine.com/
- **Clio** — https://www.clio.com/

## What this does and does not tell you

An AI read each page and wrote down the claims it makes, then grouped the claims that say the same thing. **No score in this report was written by a model** — every number is computed from those groupings in our own code, with the weights shown above.

## The only way to know if it matters

This report can tell you where your messaging overlaps. It cannot tell you whether a buyer would care, or which of your reasons to buy actually land. Put the page in front of real B2B buyers in your target market and ask them.

[Test it with real buyers](https://wynter.com)