Your verdict
Your page is mostly the same.
Most of what your page says, Directive says too. You're the most same of the 9 Marketing agencies sites scored (category avg 60).
Each named site is scored the same way, against the other 3 in this set, so its tick means the same as your marker. The dashed line is the frozen benchmark average.
More same than average
The average Marketing agencies category leader scores 60; you scored 71.
You are 11 points more same than the average Marketing agencies category leader.
Closest overlap: Directive
Of the 3 sites you named, Directive echoes the most of what your page says. Scored the same way against the rest of the set, Directive sits at 62.
Directive is the competitor you sound most like.
Room to own more
0% of your claim space is ownable: unique, relevant, and hard to copy. 1 of those claims sits in body copy, where few readers reach it.
0% is ownable, and 1 buried opportunity could help you stand out more.
Three changes worth testing first.
Chosen by rule from the comparison with Refine Labs, Directive and KlientBoost: the shared claim taking your most prominent space, then the claims only you make that sit too low on the page to be read. Each one links to its claim card.
- “Paid media management for B2B SaaS CMOs scaling past Series A”
Refine Labs, Directive and KlientBoost all say it too. Buyers may still need it, but shared ground cannot carry your hero — move it lower and give that space to something only you can say.
Table stakesMost of the set says this too. - “Pipeline (paid) up 212%”
Nobody in the set says this. It sits in body copy, where few readers reach it — worth testing higher up the page; only buyers can tell you whether it lands.
SurfaceYours alone. Test it higher up. - “Designed around the shortlist they build months before they fill out a form”
Keep the fact, lose the position: refine Labs and Directive say it too (67% of the set), and your hero is spending its first impression on the same territory as theirs.
Table stakesMost of the set says this too.
Try these changes, then test them with real buyers.
This measures overlap. Whether buyers notice is a different question, and only they can answer it.
What you can own
Claims only you make, that buyers weigh, and that competitors can’t easily copy.
0% of your page’s claim space is yours to keep.
Why this is not 100 minus the Sameness Index
The index is a weighted composite across six categories, including page structure and visuals. This bar is measured on your claims alone, weighted by where each one sits on the page. Different denominators, so the two never add to 100 and are not meant to.
Already leading with · 0
Nothing owned sits at hero or section level yet.
Buried in body copy · 1
- Client results: paid pipeline and CAC improvements
“Pipeline (paid) up 212%”
Where you blend in
Territory you spend prominent space on that the set also occupies. Not every line is one to delete — the question is whether it has earned the space, or whether something only you can say should be there instead.
- Commodity · 100%KeepHerospecialises in a specific buyer segment
- “Paid media management for B2B SaaS CMOs scaling past Series A”
Refine Labs, Directive and KlientBoost all say what they are and who they are for, as every page in a category must. Keep it — it is orientation, not differentiation.
They say- Refine Labs“We work with B2B tech companies at Series B and beyond”
- Directive“Every B2B vertical has its own growth playbook.”
- KlientBoost“We help scrappy startups to massive brands, from straightforward products to ultra-complex services”
- Commodity · 67%Table stakesHerobrand building creates future demand
- “Designed around the shortlist they build months before they fill out a form”
- “95% of your ICP is not in-market this quarter”
- “The average B2B buyer researches 3-9 months before raising a hand”
- “Most buyers will never convert, but they will remember”
- “Most paid media programs are built to capture the last 5% of buyers actively searching”
You say this 5 different ways.
Refine Labs and Directive cover this territory. Buyers may need to hear it, but in your hero it spends the first impression on shared ground.
They say- Refine Labs“We help companies clarify their positioning, sharpen their message, and build familiarity before buyers ever fill out a form”
- Directive“We help technology companies stand out and capture demand before the shortlist is built.”
- Commodity · 67%Table stakesHeroruns paid media across channels
- “Across every channel your buyers actually live on”
Common ground with Refine Labs and Directive. Say it if buyers need it — lower on the page, where it is not the thing they read first.
They say- Refine Labs“We run every channel with the strategy already built in — LinkedIn, Google, YouTube, Meta, CTV, OOH, and more”
- Directive“every program is designed to win where your buyers are, in every market you compete in”
- Commodity · 100%Table stakesSectiondistinctive award-winning creative in-house
- “Attention: Distinctive brand assets across every format”
Refine Labs, Directive and KlientBoost make the same claim. It cannot set you apart, so it should not carry the section.
They say- Refine Labs“we build the creative that makes buyers stop, understand what you do, and remember you”
- Directive“Offers Performance Creative services”
- KlientBoost“Performance Creative So Good We Could Have a Netflix Series”
- Commodity · 100%Table stakesSectionmeasures revenue impact via CRM data
- “Connected directly to your CRM so every decision is grounded in pipeline, stage conversion, and sales-cycle length”
- “Efficiency: Optimize for revenue, not clicks”
- “Short-term capture and long-term brand equity on the same dashboard”
You say this 3 different ways.
A buyer comparing tabs sees this on Refine Labs, Directive and KlientBoost. Yours earns nothing by repeating it up top; it can live lower down.
They say- Refine Labs“We measure what really moved pipeline, not just what got clicked”
- Directive“Directive elevates the focus of B2B marketers from MQLs to qualified pipeline”
- KlientBoost“Let's figure out where additional budget is best spent, we already have the financial math ready for you”
- Commodity · 100%Table stakesSectionnamed clients and client counts as proof
- “Trusted by marketing teams at leading mid-market B2B SaaS companies”
Refine Labs, Directive and KlientBoost got here first as far as a buyer can tell. Keep the fact for readers who need it; move the position to a claim only your page can make.
They say- Refine Labs“We've helped 300+ mid-market and enterprise B2B tech companies with $50MM+ ARR move from outdated lead generation to modern demand generation strategies”
- Directive“We're the marketing strategists behind the B2B brands you love.”
- KlientBoost“We Have More Success Stories Than Other Agencies Have Clients”
- Commodity · 67%KeepSectionproprietary AI and automation platform
- “Omni OS is our proprietary, AI-powered operating system for paid media”
- “It's the reason our team spends less time pulling reports and more time thinking”
You say this 2 different ways.
Every page has to name its category and audience, and Directive and KlientBoost do too. Keep the line; just do not expect it to do any differentiating.
They say- Directive“Stratos: the AI advantage for B2B client growth.”
- KlientBoost“Our Software (Kite) Tracks, Alerts, & Helps Achieve All Your Goals”
- Commodity · 67%Table stakesSectionquantified client results as proof
- “44% YoY SQL growth for ShareGate”
A buyer comparing tabs sees this on Refine Labs and KlientBoost too (67% of the set). Yours earns nothing by repeating it up top; it can live lower down. Nobody else uses your exact words, but everyone is on the ground. Nobody else makes this exact claim, but everyone occupies the territory — lead with the specific, not the generic.
They say- Refine Labs“41% average increase in high-intent demo requests”
- KlientBoost“We Hit 83% of Client Goals In Q2, 2026”
- Contested · 33%SharpenSectioncustomer testimonials and references as proof
- “Testimonial: 'They're focused on outcomes, not optics or activity.' - Kham Lewis”
KlientBoost is on this territory too (33% of the set). It narrows the field without winning it — make it specific enough that it cannot be said of them. Nobody else uses your exact words, but everyone is on the ground. Nobody else makes this exact claim, but everyone occupies the territory — lead with the specific, not the generic.
They say- KlientBoost“We got unlimited references for you to talk to too”
Claim-by-claim evidence
Every claim on your page (18)
What the columns mean
- Claim
- The grouped claim, then your exact line beneath it.
- Type
- What kind of claim it is: category, segment, outcome, capability, quality or proof.
- Placement
- Where it sits on your page: hero, section or body copy. Hero claims weigh most in the index.
- Same claim
- Share of the competitors making this exact claim. Drives ownership and ownable share.
- Same territory
- Share of the competitors with any claim in the same buyer-facing territory. This is what the index is scored on.
- Sayability
- Whether a competitor could truthfully make the same claim: anyone could, copyable with effort, or hard to copy.
- Relevant
- Whether buyers decide on this. A unique claim nobody buys on is not ownable.
- Ownership
- Commodity: 60% or more of the set says it. Contested: 20–59%. Unique: under 20%, owned when it is also hard to copy.
Tap a column to sort by it; tap again to reverse. Sorted by Same claim, highest first.
Builds brand familiarity before buyers enter market “Designed around the shortlist they build months before they fill out a form” | outcome | Hero | 67% | 67% | Anyone could say it | Yes | Commodity |
Runs paid media across all major channels “Across every channel your buyers actually live on” | capability | Hero | 67% | 67% | Anyone could say it | Yes | Commodity |
Distinctive, point-of-view creative made in-house “Attention: Distinctive brand assets across every format” | capability | Section | 67% | 100% | Anyone could say it | Yes | Commodity |
Optimizes to revenue/pipeline, not clicks or MQLs “Efficiency: Optimize for revenue, not clicks” | quality | Section | 67% | 100% | Anyone could say it | Yes | Commodity |
Proprietary AI platform powers our media operations “Omni OS is our proprietary, AI-powered operating system for paid media” | category | Section | 67% | 67% | Copyable with effort | Yes | Commodity |
Trusted by notable B2B brands “Trusted by marketing teams at leading mid-market B2B SaaS companies” | proof | Section | 67% | 100% | Anyone could say it | Yes | Commodity |
Serves B2B tech/SaaS companies at a specific growth stage “Paid media management for B2B SaaS CMOs scaling past Series A” | segment | Hero | 33% | 100% | Anyone could say it | Yes | Contested |
Measurement connected directly to your CRM data “Connected directly to your CRM so every decision is grounded in pipeline, stage conversion, and sales-cycle length” | capability | Section | 33% | 100% | Anyone could say it | Yes | Contested |
Short-term capture and brand equity on one dashboard “Short-term capture and long-term brand equity on the same dashboard” | capability | Section | 33% | 100% | Anyone could say it | Yes | Contested |
Automated anomaly and performance-issue detection “Automated anomaly detection (creative fatigue, spend overage, term auto-pause) saving $3.1k” | capability | Body | 33% | 67% | Copyable with effort | Yes | Contested |
95% of your ICP is not in-market now “95% of your ICP is not in-market this quarter” | proof | Section | 0% | 67% | Anyone could say it | No | Unique for now |
Automation frees the team for strategic thinking “It's the reason our team spends less time pulling reports and more time thinking” | outcome | Section | 0% | 67% | Anyone could say it | No | Unique for now |
B2B buyers research 3-9 months before contact “The average B2B buyer researches 3-9 months before raising a hand” | proof | Section | 0% | 67% | Anyone could say it | No | Unique for now |
Client results: SQL growth and cost-per-SQL wins “44% YoY SQL growth for ShareGate” | proof | Section | 0% | 67% | Anyone could say it | Yes | Unique for now |
Client testimonials praise partnership and outcomes “Testimonial: 'They're focused on outcomes, not optics or activity.' - Kham Lewis” | proof | Section | 0% | 33% | Anyone could say it | No | Unique for now |
Most buyers never convert but remember you “Most buyers will never convert, but they will remember” | outcome | Section | 0% | 67% | Anyone could say it | No | Unique for now |
Most paid programs only capture in-market demand “Most paid media programs are built to capture the last 5% of buyers actively searching” | quality | Section | 0% | 67% | Anyone could say it | Yes | Unique for now |
Client results: paid pipeline and CAC improvements “Pipeline (paid) up 212%” | proof | Body | 0% | 67% | Anyone could say it | Yes | Unique for now |
- Builds brand familiarity before buyers enter market“Designed around the shortlist they build months before they fill out a form”outcomeHerosame claim 67%same territory 67%Anyone could say itCommodityAlso on Refine Labs, Directive
- Runs paid media across all major channels“Across every channel your buyers actually live on”capabilityHerosame claim 67%same territory 67%Anyone could say itCommodityAlso on Refine Labs, Directive
- Distinctive, point-of-view creative made in-house“Attention: Distinctive brand assets across every format”capabilitySectionsame claim 67%same territory 100%Anyone could say itCommodityAlso on Refine Labs, Directive
- Optimizes to revenue/pipeline, not clicks or MQLs“Efficiency: Optimize for revenue, not clicks”qualitySectionsame claim 67%same territory 100%Anyone could say itCommodityAlso on Refine Labs, Directive
- Proprietary AI platform powers our media operations“Omni OS is our proprietary, AI-powered operating system for paid media”categorySectionsame claim 67%same territory 67%Copyable with effortCommodityAlso on Directive, KlientBoost
- Trusted by notable B2B brands“Trusted by marketing teams at leading mid-market B2B SaaS companies”proofSectionsame claim 67%same territory 100%Anyone could say itCommodityAlso on Directive, KlientBoost
- Serves B2B tech/SaaS companies at a specific growth stage“Paid media management for B2B SaaS CMOs scaling past Series A”segmentHerosame claim 33%same territory 100%Anyone could say itContestedAlso on Refine Labs
- Measurement connected directly to your CRM data“Connected directly to your CRM so every decision is grounded in pipeline, stage conversion, and sales-cycle length”capabilitySectionsame claim 33%same territory 100%Anyone could say itContestedAlso on Directive
- Short-term capture and brand equity on one dashboard“Short-term capture and long-term brand equity on the same dashboard”capabilitySectionsame claim 33%same territory 100%Anyone could say itContestedAlso on Refine Labs
- Automated anomaly and performance-issue detection“Automated anomaly detection (creative fatigue, spend overage, term auto-pause) saving $3.1k”capabilityBodysame claim 33%same territory 67%Copyable with effortContestedAlso on KlientBoost
- 95% of your ICP is not in-market now“95% of your ICP is not in-market this quarter”proofSectionsame claim 0%same territory 67%Anyone could say itnot a buying criterionUnique for now
- Automation frees the team for strategic thinking“It's the reason our team spends less time pulling reports and more time thinking”outcomeSectionsame claim 0%same territory 67%Anyone could say itnot a buying criterionUnique for now
- B2B buyers research 3-9 months before contact“The average B2B buyer researches 3-9 months before raising a hand”proofSectionsame claim 0%same territory 67%Anyone could say itnot a buying criterionUnique for now
- Client results: SQL growth and cost-per-SQL wins“44% YoY SQL growth for ShareGate”proofSectionsame claim 0%same territory 67%Anyone could say itUnique for now
- Client testimonials praise partnership and outcomes“Testimonial: 'They're focused on outcomes, not optics or activity.' - Kham Lewis”proofSectionsame claim 0%same territory 33%Anyone could say itnot a buying criterionUnique for now
- Most buyers never convert but remember you“Most buyers will never convert, but they will remember”outcomeSectionsame claim 0%same territory 67%Anyone could say itnot a buying criterionUnique for now
- Most paid programs only capture in-market demand“Most paid media programs are built to capture the last 5% of buyers actively searching”qualitySectionsame claim 0%same territory 67%Anyone could say itUnique for now
- Client results: paid pipeline and CAC improvements“Pipeline (paid) up 212%”proofBodysame claim 0%same territory 67%Anyone could say itUnique for now
How this was calculated
Sameness measures how much your claims overlap with the sites compared. It does not measure message quality or whether buyers prefer you.
AI-analyzed: an AI read each page on its own and grouped the claims that say the same thing. No score here was written by a model — every number is computed from those groupings in our own code, with the weights below.
How the score is built
| Category | Weight | Yours | What a high score means |
|---|---|---|---|
Messaging Category framing, who it is for, and the outcome promised | 30% | 75 | The most expensive kind of sameness. A buyer cannot tell what job you do that the others do not. |
Claims Attribute and benefit claims — speed, ease, quality, ROI | 30% | 83 | Every shared claim is a line already read on another tab. Cut the ones nobody owns and spend the space on something they cannot. |
Features Capabilities and functions the page lists | 15% | 87 | Expected in a mature category, and the least alarming of the six. Feature parity is normal; leading with it is the mistake. |
Proof The kinds of evidence offered: customer logos, numbers, testimonials, case studies, badges | 10% | 37 | Same kinds of proof as everyone means the proof stops working as proof. It is scored on the kind of evidence, not on which customers are named. |
Structure Section order, navigation, CTA language and placement | 10% | 50 | The generic SaaS template — hero, logos, three-feature grid, testimonial, CTA. Familiar is not the same as memorable. |
Visual Palette family, imagery style, layout patterns | 5% | 25 | Weighted lowest on purpose: buyers rarely decide on this. Worth knowing, rarely worth fixing first. |
Each site was read on its own first, with no knowledge of the others, so your page gets no benefit of the doubt a competitor’s does not. A category nothing could be measured for drops out and the rest are re-weighted, rather than counted as zero.
What we compared (4 pages read)
What it cannot tell you
The index can find where two pages converge. It cannot say whether a buyer would notice, or which of your reasons to buy actually land. A single check also moves several points between runs, so read the band and the ranking, not the last digit.
Your highest-impact changes
- 1Table stakesYour hero copy says “Paid media management for B2B SaaS CMOs scaling past Series A”.
Refine Labs, Directive and KlientBoost all say it too. Buyers may still need it, but shared ground cannot carry your hero — move it lower and give that space to something only you can say.
- 2Table stakesYour hero copy says “Designed around the shortlist they build months before they fill out a form”.
Keep the fact, lose the position: refine Labs and Directive say it too (67% of the set), and your hero is spending its first impression on the same territory as theirs.
- 3Table stakesYour hero copy says “Across every channel your buyers actually live on”.
This is the set's common ground — Refine Labs and Directive say it too (67% of the set). It will not set you apart wherever it sits, and in the hero it costs you the one place a distinctive claim would be read.
- 4Table stakesYour section copy says “Attention: Distinctive brand assets across every format”.
A buyer with three tabs open reads a version of this on every one of them. Say it further down for the readers who need it; the section should carry a claim they will only find here.
- 5Table stakesYour section copy says “Connected directly to your CRM so every decision is grounded in pipeline, stage conversion, and sales-cycle l…”.
True of you and true of them: Refine Labs, Directive and KlientBoost all say it too. That is why it decides nothing, and why the section is the wrong place to spend it.
- 6Table stakesYour section copy says “Efficiency: Optimize for revenue, not clicks”.
In the section: Keep the fact, lose the position: refine Labs, Directive and KlientBoost all say it too, and your section is spending its first impression on the same territory as theirs.
- 7Table stakesYour section copy says “Short-term capture and long-term brand equity on the same dashboard”.
In the section: This is the set's common ground — Refine Labs, Directive and KlientBoost all say it too. It will not set you apart wherever it sits, and in the section it costs you the one place a distinctive claim would be read.
- 8Table stakesYour section copy says “Trusted by marketing teams at leading mid-market B2B SaaS companies”.
In the section: Refine Labs, Directive and KlientBoost all say it too. Buyers may still need it, but shared ground cannot carry your section — move it lower and give that space to something only you can say.
- 9Surface“Pipeline (paid) up 212%” is yours alone, and buyers weigh it.
Nobody in the set says this. It sits in body copy, where few readers reach it — worth testing higher up the page; only buyers can tell you whether it lands.
The only way to know if it matters.
This report can tell you where your messaging overlaps. It cannot tell you whether a buyer would care, or which of your reasons to buy actually land. Put the page in front of real B2B buyers in your target market and ask them.







