# Your page scores 60 out of 100 for sameness against the 4 competitors you named.

Most of what your page says, Zabbix says too — the overlap is heaviest in what you say you do and who it's for.

- **Your page:** https://www.opennms.com/
- **Compared against:** Zabbix (zabbix.com), Paessler PRTG (paessler.com), SolarWinds (solarwinds.com), Auvik (auvik.com)
- **Sameness Index:** 60 — Mostly the same
- **Ownable share:** 0% (of 24% distinctive)
- **Report:** https://grader.wynter.com/c/opennms-com-x8IaAIU

**How you compare · vs 8 IT service management category leaders** — 3 points more same than the average IT service management category leader. The average IT service management category leader scores 57; you scored 60. You are less same than 2 of the 8 IT service management category leaders. The best-differentiated site in the set is at 44.
_A single check can move several points between runs; the benchmark averages up to eight sites per category._

## 1. Sameness Index

| Category | Weight | Score | What it means |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Messaging | 30% | 70 | The most expensive kind of sameness. A buyer cannot tell what job you do that the others do not. |
| Claims | 30% | 69 | Every shared claim is a line already read on another tab. Cut the ones nobody owns and spend the space on something they cannot. |
| Features | 15% | 67 | Expected in a mature category, and the least alarming of the six. Feature parity is normal; leading with it is the mistake. |
| Proof | 10% | 19 | Same kinds of proof as everyone means the proof stops working as proof. It is scored on the kind of evidence, not on which customers are named. |
| Structure | 10% | 38 | The generic SaaS template — hero, logos, three-feature grid, testimonial, CTA. Familiar is not the same as memorable. |
| Visual | 5% | not measured | Not enough on either page to compare. |

**Mostly the same** — Most of your claims are also theirs. Only the details differ.

## 2. Closest competitors

| Competitor | Same | Band |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Zabbix | 73 | Mostly the same |
| Paessler PRTG | 63 | Mostly the same |
| SolarWinds | 60 | Mostly the same |
| Auvik | 52 | Half shared |

_Measured from your side: how much of what YOU say each competitor also says, weighted by where you put it._

## 3. Ownable share

**The share of your own page's claim space that is yours to keep.** This is not the inverse of the Sameness Index — it is measured on your claims alone, so the two do not add up to 100 and are not meant to.

24% of your prominent page space is spent on claims no competitor makes — and none of it is ownable, because those claims are either not what buyers decide on or trivially copyable. Unique is not the same as differentiated.

- **Distinctive message share:** 24% — prominent space spent on claims no competitor makes.
- **Ownable share:** 0% — the part of that which is also relevant to how buyers choose and hard to copy.

## 4. Where you sound like everyone else

Most of your set makes each of these and you are spending prominent space on them, ranked by how much. **These are not necessarily lines to delete** — some of what a page has to say is unavoidably shared, and claims about what kind of product you are were left out of this list for exactly that reason. The question each one raises is whether it has earned its space.

- **comprehensive all-in-one monitoring coverage** (Section, 100% of the set) — also on Zabbix, Paessler PRTG, SolarWinds, Auvik
  - _"Comprehensive network monitoring software"_
- **monitors complex/distributed enterprise infrastructure at scale** (Section, 75% of the set) — also on Zabbix, Paessler PRTG, SolarWinds
  - _"Dynamic scalability for data processing. Monitor tens of thousands of data points via a distributed and tiered system."_
- **less effort to maintain and manage** (Section, 75% of the set) — also on Zabbix, SolarWinds, Auvik
  - _"Maximizes the platform's value and minimizes the effort required to maintain it"_

## 5. Buried gold

Nothing buried — every unique, relevant claim is already prominent.

## 6. Claim inventory

| Claim | Type | Placement | Common | Sayability | Relevant | Ownership |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Monitors complex distributed enterprise infrastructure | category | Hero | 25% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| Makes monitoring and alerting easy despite complexity | quality | Hero | 50% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| Comprehensive/all-in-one monitoring coverage in one tool | quality | Section | 75% | anyone | yes | Commodity |
| Extensible event-driven architecture and integrations | capability | Section | 50% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| Fully open source software | category | Section | 25% | some | yes | Contested |
| Scales to tens of thousands of data points | capability | Section | 50% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| Reduces effort to maintain the platform | outcome | Section | 25% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| Named customers trust the product | proof | Section | 50% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| Backed by large community plus commercial vendor | proof | Section | 0% | some | no | Unique and owned |
| Enterprise edition/product tier for enterprises | category | Section | 0% | anyone | no | Unique for now |
| Subscription gives access to stabilized version | capability | Section | 0% | some | no | Unique and owned |

## What we compared

- **OpenNMS** (your page) — https://www.opennms.com/
- **Zabbix** — https://www.zabbix.com/
- **Paessler PRTG** — https://www.paessler.com/
- **SolarWinds** — https://www.solarwinds.com/network-performance-monitor
- **Auvik** — https://www.auvik.com/

## What this does and does not tell you

An AI read each page and wrote down the claims it makes, then grouped the claims that say the same thing. **No score in this report was written by a model** — every number is computed from those groupings in our own code, with the weights shown above.

## The only way to know if it matters

This report can tell you where your messaging overlaps. It cannot tell you whether a buyer would care, or which of your reasons to buy actually land. Put the page in front of real B2B buyers in your target market and ask them.

[Test it with real buyers](https://wynter.com)