# Your page scores 50 out of 100 for sameness against the 3 competitors you named.

Parts of your page are genuinely your own — but the features you list is where you and Siemens start to sound the same.

- **Your page:** https://www.ptc.com/en
- **Compared against:** Siemens (siemens.com), Dassault Systèmes (3ds.com), Autodesk Fusion (autodesk.com)
- **Sameness Index:** 50 — Half shared
- **Ownable share:** 30% (of 47% distinctive)
- **Report:** https://grader.wynter.com/c/ptc-com-MrBcwiU

**How you compare · vs 366 SaaS sites** — 6 points less same than the average SaaS site. The average SaaS site scores 56; you scored 50. You are less same than 267 of the 366 SaaS sites. The best-differentiated site in the set is at 6.
_A single check can move several points between runs; the benchmark averages up to eight sites per category._

> With 3 competitors, commonness can only take 4 distinct values. The figures are honest at that resolution and no finer.

## 1. Sameness Index

| Category | Weight | Score | What it means |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Messaging | 30% | 52 | The most expensive kind of sameness. A buyer cannot tell what job you do that the others do not. |
| Claims | 30% | 50 | Every shared claim is a line already read on another tab. Cut the ones nobody owns and spend the space on something they cannot. |
| Features | 15% | 65 | Expected in a mature category, and the least alarming of the six. Feature parity is normal; leading with it is the mistake. |
| Proof | 10% | 33 | Same kinds of proof as everyone means the proof stops working as proof. It is scored on the kind of evidence, not on which customers are named. |
| Structure | 10% | 38 | The generic SaaS template — hero, logos, three-feature grid, testimonial, CTA. Familiar is not the same as memorable. |
| Visual | 5% | 48 | Weighted lowest on purpose: buyers rarely decide on this. Worth knowing, rarely worth fixing first. |

**Half shared** — About half your claims are also on competitor pages.

## 2. Closest competitors

| Competitor | Echoes your claims |
| --- | --- |
| Siemens | 56% |
| Dassault Systèmes | 53% |
| Autodesk Fusion | 40% |

_Measured from your side: the share of what YOU say that each competitor also says, weighted by where you put it. This is not a Sameness Index — a competitor can echo most of your page and still score low on its own index by saying a great deal you do not._

## 3. Ownable share

**The share of your own page's claim space that is yours to keep.** This is not the inverse of the Sameness Index — it is measured on your claims alone, so the two do not add up to 100 and are not meant to.

30% of your page is unique, relevant and defensible — a strong share, and the thing to protect in any rewrite.

- **Distinctive message share:** 47% — prominent space spent on claims no competitor makes.
- **Ownable share:** 30% — the part of that which is also relevant to how buyers choose and hard to copy.

## 4. Where you sound like everyone else

Most of your set makes each of these and you are spending prominent space on them, ranked by how much. **These are not necessarily lines to delete** — some of what a page has to say is unavoidably shared, and claims about what kind of product you are were left out of this list for exactly that reason. The question each one raises is whether it has earned its space.

- **Speeds product development and time to market** (Hero, 100% of the set) — also on Siemens, Dassault Systèmes, Autodesk Fusion
  - _"With PTC solutions, you can reduce product development friction and complexity"_
- **Core CAD/3D design and modeling capability** (Section, 100% of the set) — also on Siemens, Dassault Systèmes, Autodesk Fusion
  - _"Get ahead of product complexity in the engineering phase by leveraging simulation tools to analyze and validate the performance of your 3D virtual prototypes"_
- **Named customers and broad customer base as proof** (Section, 100% of the set) — also on Siemens, Dassault Systèmes, Autodesk Fusion
  - _"95% of Fortune 500 discrete manufacturing companies are PTC customers"_
- **Speeds product development and time to market** (Section, 100% of the set) — also on Siemens, Dassault Systèmes, Autodesk Fusion
  - _"Drive growth and innovation"_
- **Core CAD/3D design and modeling capability** (Section, 100% of the set) — also on Siemens, Dassault Systèmes, Autodesk Fusion
  - _"Create 3D models so they effectively contain all the data needed to define a product, becoming the source authority for engineering, manufacturing, quality…"_
  - Said your way: nobody else makes this exact claim, but everyone occupies the territory.
- **Best-in-class solutions plus partner ecosystem** (Section, 67% of the set) — also on Siemens, Dassault Systèmes
  - _"Our customers rely on our best-in-class solutions, open software philosophy, extensive partner network, and deep industry expertise to drive digital…"_
- **Lowers product development and ownership cost** (Section, 67% of the set) — also on Siemens, Autodesk Fusion
  - _"Reduce costs by transforming your product development processes"_
- **PLM governance, traceability and change control** (Section, 67% of the set) — also on Siemens, Autodesk Fusion
  - _"With enterprise PLM, product companies are creating data governance and traceability for automated, accurate, and coordinated change management"_

## 5. Buried gold

Unique, relevant, and sitting in body copy. The cheapest wins here — you already have the differentiation and the page hides it.

- **Cloud-native PLM/QMS streamlines development and quality** (Body, 0% of the set)
  - _"Streamline product development, manage supply chain complexities, and improve product quality with cloud-native PLM and QMS solutions (Arena)"_
- **Intuitive interface with robust modeling capability** (Body, 0% of the set)
  - _"Creo's intuitive interfaces and robust modeling capabilities empower users to streamline intricate design and development processes"_

## 6. Claim inventory

| Claim | Type | Placement | Common | Sayability | Relevant | Ownership |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reduces product development friction and complexity | outcome | Hero | 33% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| Improves product quality and consistency | outcome | Hero | 0% | anyone | yes | Unique for now |
| Simulation validates designs before physical build | capability | Section | 100% | some | yes | Commodity |
| Used by most large manufacturers / broad customer base | proof | Section | 67% | some | yes | Commodity |
| Drives faster innovation and growth | outcome | Section | 33% | anyone | yes | Contested |
| 3D model as single authoritative product definition | capability | Section | 0% | some | yes | Unique and owned |
| Best-in-class solutions plus partner ecosystem and expertise | quality | Section | 67% | anyone | yes | Commodity |
| Lowers product development and ownership costs | outcome | Section | 67% | anyone | yes | Commodity |
| PLM provides governance, traceability, controlled change management | capability | Section | 33% | some | yes | Contested |
| ALM reduces software risk and compliance burden | outcome | Section | 0% | some | yes | Unique and owned |
| Digital thread delivers accurate contextual data to all stakeholders | capability | Section | 33% | some | yes | Contested |
| Configuration management aligns engineering, manufacturing, service | outcome | Section | 0% | some | yes | Unique and owned |
| Gives supply chain partners secure current product data | capability | Section | 0% | some | yes | Unique and owned |
| Long-standing industry-standard CAD software | proof | Section | 0% | some | yes | Unique and owned |
| Differentiates customer experience and service offerings | outcome | Section | 0% | anyone | no | Unique for now |
| Named marquee customers use the product | proof | Body | 67% | some | yes | Commodity |
| Cloud-native PLM/QMS streamlines development and quality | capability | Body | 0% | some | yes | Unique and owned |
| Cloud CAD/PDM works on any device, anywhere | capability | Body | 33% | some | yes | Contested |
| Intuitive interface with robust modeling capability | quality | Body | 0% | anyone | yes | Unique for now |

## What we compared

- **PTC** (your page) — https://www.ptc.com/en
- **Siemens** — https://www.siemens.com/en-us/
- **Dassault Systèmes** — https://www.3ds.com/
- **Autodesk Fusion** — https://www.autodesk.com/products/fusion-360/overview

## What this does and does not tell you

An AI read each page and wrote down the claims it makes, then grouped the claims that say the same thing. **No score in this report was written by a model** — every number is computed from those groupings in our own code, with the weights shown above.

## The only way to know if it matters

This report can tell you where your messaging overlaps. It cannot tell you whether a buyer would care, or which of your reasons to buy actually land. Put the page in front of real B2B buyers in your target market and ask them.

[Test it with real buyers](https://wynter.com)
