Sameness Index · 5 sites compared

Your page scores 46 out of 100 for sameness against the 4 competitors you named.

https://www.thoughtfarmer.com/

01

Your verdict

46
Sameness · vs 4 named
How is this calculated?

Your page is half shared.

About half of what your page says, Workvivo also says. You're less same than 7 of the 8 Employee intranet sites scored (category avg 62).

Benchmarked against Employee intranet (the category you chose).
Sameness Index on a 0 to 100 scale, from distinctive at 0 to interchangeable at 100. This page scores 46. Simpplr scores 63. Staffbase scores 64. lumapps.com scores 57. Workvivo scores 72. The category avg is 62.

Each named site is scored the same way, against the other 4 in this set, so its tick means the same as your marker. The dashed line is the frozen benchmark average.

  1. Less same than average

    The average Employee intranet category leader scores 62; you scored 46.

    You are 16 points less same than the average Employee intranet category leader.

  2. Closest overlap: Workvivo

    Of the 4 sites you named, Workvivo echoes the most of what your page says: 60% of it, weighted by placement. Scored the same way you were, against the rest of the set, Workvivo's own Sameness Index is 72. Those are different measures: the first is overlap with your page, the second is how same Workvivo's whole page is.

    Workvivo is the competitor you sound most like.

  3. Room to own more

    7% of your claim space is ownable: unique, relevant, and hard to copy. 1 of those claims sits in body copy, where few readers reach it.

    7% is ownable, and 1 buried opportunity could help you stand out more.

Do this first

Three changes worth testing first.

Chosen by rule from the comparison with Simpplr, Staffbase, lumapps.com and Workvivo: the shared claim taking your most prominent space, then the claims only you make that sit too low on the page to be read. Each one links to its claim card.

  1. “The easy-to-use intranet”

    Simpplr, Staffbase and Workvivo say it too (75% of the set). Buyers may still need it, but shared ground cannot carry your hero — move it lower and give that space to something only you can say.

    Table stakes
    Most of the set says this too.
  2. “Banking intranet solutions”

    Nobody in the set says this. It sits in body copy, where few readers reach it — worth testing higher up the page; only buyers can tell you whether it lands.

    Surface
    Yours alone. Test it higher up.
  3. “Keep your team aligned and informed with software built for today's dispersed workforce”

    Keep the fact, lose the position: simpplr, Staffbase, lumapps.com and Workvivo all say it too, and your section is spending its first impression on the same territory as theirs.

    Table stakes
    Most of the set says this too.

Try these changes, then test them with real buyers.

This measures overlap. Whether buyers notice is a different question, and only they can answer it.

02

What you can own

Claims only you make, that buyers weigh, and that competitors can’t easily copy.

7% of your page’s claim space is yours to keep.

7%Yours to keep30%Unique but weak63%A competitor says it too
Why this is not 100 minus the Sameness Index

The index is a weighted composite across six categories, including page structure and visuals. This bar is measured on your claims alone, weighted by where each one sits on the page. Different denominators, so the two never add to 100 and are not meant to.

Already leading with · 1

  1. High customer review ratings

    “4.7 stars 100+ reviews”

Buried in body copy · 1

  1. Prepackaged solutions for specific verticals

    “Banking intranet solutions”

03

Where you blend in

Territory you spend prominent space on that the set also occupies. Not every line is one to delete — the question is whether it has earned the space, or whether something only you can say should be there instead.

  • Commodity · 75%Table stakesHero
    Easy to use for everyone
    • “The easy-to-use intranet”

    Simpplr, Staffbase and Workvivo cover this territory. Buyers may need to hear it, but in your hero it spends the first impression on shared ground.

    They say
    • Simpplr“We chose Simpplr because it was easy to use for both end users and the IT team”
    • Staffbase“Adoption doesn't just happen. It's designed.”
    • Workvivo“Customer testimonial: helps keep in touch with company updates, easy setup, user-friendly, rated 10/10”
  • Commodity · 100%Table stakesSection
    Improves internal communications reach and targeting
    • “Keep your team aligned and informed with software built for today's dispersed workforce”
    • “Simplify communications”

    You say this 2 different ways.

    Common ground with Simpplr, Staffbase, lumapps.com and Workvivo. Say it if buyers need it — lower on the page, where it is not the thing they read first.

    They say
    • Simpplr“Align teams, find answers, and move work forward faster”
    • Staffbase“Target and orchestrate communications across every channel, dynamically tailored by role, location, and context”
    • lumapps.com“Create, target, and deliver across desktop and mobile, all from one platform”
    • Workvivo“Deliver engaging company broadcasts with AI-generated summaries and smart chapters”
  • Commodity · 100%Table stakesSection
    Single hub unifying content, tools and people
    • “Centralize knowledge”

    Simpplr, Staffbase, lumapps.com and Workvivo make the same claim. It cannot set you apart, so it should not carry the section.

    They say
    • Simpplr“Simpplr brings communications, knowledge, people, and workflows together in one AI-powered intranet”
    • Staffbase“Staffbase connects your people to the communications, knowledge, and actions they need, across every channel.”
    • lumapps.com“LumApps goes beyond a traditional intranet”
    • Workvivo“Replace your legacy intranet with one trusted home for company knowledge”
  • Commodity · 75%Table stakesSection
    Measured adoption and engagement results
    • “It's been such a game changer – the traffic is constant, and everyone loves it”

    A buyer comparing tabs sees this on Simpplr, Staffbase and lumapps.com too (75% of the set). Yours earns nothing by repeating it up top; it can live lower down.

    They say
    • Simpplr“Simpplr's Recognition has been extremely positive since launching, with new posts every day from employees at various levels”
    • Staffbase“Join 30,000+ employee experience professionals sharing benchmarks, strategies, and real-world learnings across industries.”
    • lumapps.com“Deep analytics prove what's working”
  • Commodity · 75%Table stakesSection
    Named customers as proof
    • “#1 intranet for banks”
    • “ThoughtFarmer is trusted by industry leaders”

    You say this 2 different ways.

    Staffbase, lumapps.com and Workvivo got here first as far as a buyer can tell. Keep the fact for readers who need it; move the position to a claim only your page can make.

    They say
    • Staffbase“Trusted by over 1,500 enterprise customers worldwide”
    • lumapps.com“Trusted by more than seven million employees”
    • Workvivo“Loved by millions around the world”
  • Commodity · 75%Table stakesSection
    Third-party recognition and ratings
    • “4.7 stars 100+ reviews”
    • “Recognized as a leading intranet vendor”

    You say this 2 different ways.

    Shared with Simpplr, lumapps.com and Workvivo, 75% of the set. True of you, true of them — which is exactly why it will not decide anything.

    They say
    • Simpplr“Simpplr named a Leader in The Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms, Q2 2026”
    • lumapps.com“The leading AI Employee Hub”
    • Workvivo“#2 Best Enterprise Software Product in the World (G2 Best Software Awards)”
  • Contested · 25%SharpenHero
    Fast, smooth deployment
    • “Launch quickly and manage confidently”

    Workvivo is on this territory too (25% of the set). It narrows the field without winning it — make it specific enough that it cannot be said of them.

    They say
    • Workvivo“Customer testimonial: out-of-the-box solution, crew downloaded app quickly, live within six weeks (Ryanair)”
  • Contested · 25%SharpenSection
    Builds culture, connection and recognition
    • “Build workplace culture”

    Shared with Simpplr. Sharpen it to the thing only you do here, or it reads as a claim any of you could make.

    They say
    • Simpplr“Build connection, belonging, and culture”
  • Contested · 25%SharpenSection
    Responsive customer support
    • “The support we get from ThoughtFarmer is phenomenal. Response times on help requests are great.”

    Contested ground: Staffbase claim it as well. The version that wins names a mechanism, a number or a scope that theirs cannot match.

    They say
    • Staffbase“Dedicated success teams, migration support, and hands-on implementation ensure your platform drives engagement from the start.”
04

Claim-by-claim evidence

Every claim on your page (23)
What the columns mean
Claim
The grouped claim, then your exact line beneath it.
Type
What kind of claim it is: category, segment, outcome, capability, quality or proof.
Placement
Where it sits on your page: hero, section or body copy. Hero claims weigh most in the index.
Same claim
Share of the competitors making this exact claim. Drives ownership and ownable share.
Same territory
Share of the competitors with any claim in the same buyer-facing territory. This is what the index is scored on.
Sayability
Whether a competitor could truthfully make the same claim: anyone could, copyable with effort, or hard to copy.
Relevant
Whether buyers decide on this. A unique claim nobody buys on is not ownable.
Ownership
Commodity: 60% or more of the set says it. Contested: 20–59%. Unique: under 20%, owned when it is also hard to copy.

Tap a column to sort by it; tap again to reverse. Sorted by Same claim, highest first.

  • Built-in AI across the platform
    “Leverage ThoughtFarmer's all-in-one AI”
    capabilityBodysame claim 100%same territory 100%Anyone could say it
    Commodity
    Also on Simpplr, Staffbase, lumapps.com, Workvivo
  • Targeted, personalized communications by audience
    “Use targeted communications to ensure updates gets to the right people”
    capabilityBodysame claim 100%same territory 100%Anyone could say it
    Commodity
    Also on Simpplr, Staffbase, lumapps.com, Workvivo
  • Trusted by named industry-leading customers
    “ThoughtFarmer is trusted by industry leaders”
    proofSectionsame claim 75%same territory 75%Anyone could say it
    Commodity
    Also on Staffbase, lumapps.com, Workvivo
  • Platform is easy to use for everyone
    “The easy-to-use intranet”
    qualityHerosame claim 50%same territory 75%Anyone could say it
    Contested
    Also on Simpplr, Workvivo
  • Recognized as a leading intranet vendor by analysts/review sites
    “Recognized as a leading intranet vendor”
    proofSectionsame claim 50%same territory 75%Copyable with effort
    Contested
    Also on Simpplr, Workvivo
  • Single source of truth for company knowledge
    “Centralize knowledge”
    capabilitySectionsame claim 50%same territory 100%Anyone could say it
    Contested
    Also on lumapps.com, Workvivo
  • AI assists writing and content creation
    “Draft, polish, and refine content effortlessly using ThoughtFarmer AI Create and Enhance”
    capabilityBodysame claim 50%same territory 100%Anyone could say it
    Contested
    Also on lumapps.com, Workvivo
  • Enterprise-wide intelligent search
    “Universal smart search”
    capabilityBodysame claim 50%same territory 75%Anyone could say it
    Contested
    Also on Simpplr, Workvivo
  • Fast, smooth launch and deployment
    “Launch quickly and manage confidently”
    outcomeHerosame claim 25%same territory 25%Anyone could say it
    Contested
    Also on Workvivo
  • Builds workplace culture, connection and belonging
    “Build workplace culture”
    outcomeSectionsame claim 25%same territory 25%Anyone could say it
    Contested
    Also on Simpplr
  • High employee traffic and engagement after launch
    “It's been such a game changer – the traffic is constant, and everyone loves it”
    proofSectionsame claim 25%same territory 75%Anyone could say it
    Contested
    Also on Simpplr
  • Keeps dispersed teams aligned and informed
    “Keep your team aligned and informed with software built for today's dispersed workforce”
    outcomeSectionsame claim 25%same territory 100%Anyone could say it
    Contested
    Also on Simpplr
  • Responsive, high-quality customer support
    “The support we get from ThoughtFarmer is phenomenal. Response times on help requests are great.”
    proofSectionsame claim 25%same territory 25%Anyone could say it
    Contested
    Also on Staffbase
  • Broadcast news with push notifications that cut through noise
    “Broadcast important news and send push notifications that cut through the noise”
    capabilityBodysame claim 25%same territory 100%Anyone could say it
    Contested
    Also on Workvivo
  • High customer review ratings
    “4.7 stars 100+ reviews”
    proofSectionsame claim 0%same territory 75%Copyable with effort
    Unique and owned
  • Leading choice for banking sector
    “#1 intranet for banks”
    proofSectionsame claim 0%same territory 75%Copyable with effortnot a buying criterion
    Unique and owned
  • Mission to make work better
    “Our mission is to make work better”
    outcomeSectionsame claim 0%same territory 0%Anyone could say itnot a buying criterion
    Unique for now
  • Personalized demo with an expert available
    “Get a personalized demo from an intranet expert”
    capabilitySectionsame claim 0%same territory 0%Anyone could say itnot a buying criterion
    Unique for now
  • Simplifies and improves internal communications
    “Simplify communications”
    capabilitySectionsame claim 0%same territory 100%Anyone could say it
    Unique for now
  • Vendor has deep industry-specific expertise
    “We're experts in your field”
    qualitySectionsame claim 0%same territory 0%Anyone could say it
    Unique for now
  • Employee directory search by skills and role
    “Discover colleagues by name, role, skills, or team”
    capabilityBodysame claim 0%same territory 75%Anyone could say itnot a buying criterion
    Unique for now
  • Prepackaged solutions for specific verticals
    “Banking intranet solutions”
    segmentBodysame claim 0%same territory 0%Copyable with effort
    Unique and owned
  • Showcases award-winning customer intranets
    “We celebrate the best-in-class ThoughtFarmer intranets”
    proofBodysame claim 0%same territory 75%Anyone could say itnot a buying criterion
    Unique for now
05

How this was calculated

Sameness measures how much your claims overlap with the sites compared. It does not measure message quality or whether buyers prefer you.

AI-analyzed: an AI read each page on its own and grouped the claims that say the same thing. No score here was written by a model — every number is computed from those groupings in our own code, with the weights below.

How the score is built
The six category scores, their weights, and what a high score in each one means
CategoryWeightYoursWhat a high score means
Messaging
Category framing, who it is for, and the outcome promised
30%33The most expensive kind of sameness. A buyer cannot tell what job you do that the others do not.
Claims
Attribute and benefit claims — speed, ease, quality, ROI
30%47Every shared claim is a line already read on another tab. Cut the ones nobody owns and spend the space on something they cannot.
Features
Capabilities and functions the page lists
15%77Expected in a mature category, and the least alarming of the six. Feature parity is normal; leading with it is the mistake.
Proof
The kinds of evidence offered: customer logos, numbers, testimonials, case studies, badges
10%29Same kinds of proof as everyone means the proof stops working as proof. It is scored on the kind of evidence, not on which customers are named.
Structure
Section order, navigation, CTA language and placement
10%50The generic SaaS template — hero, logos, three-feature grid, testimonial, CTA. Familiar is not the same as memorable.
Visual
Palette family, imagery style, layout patterns
5%59Weighted lowest on purpose: buyers rarely decide on this. Worth knowing, rarely worth fixing first.

Each site was read on its own first, with no knowledge of the others, so your page gets no benefit of the doubt a competitor’s does not. A category nothing could be measured for drops out and the rest are re-weighted, rather than counted as zero.

What we compared (5 pages read)
Your page
ThoughtFarmer
thoughtfarmer.com
Competitor
Simpplr
simpplr.com
Competitor
Staffbase
staffbase.com
Competitor
lumapps.com
lumapps.com
Competitor
Workvivo
workvivo.com
What it cannot tell you

The index can find where two pages converge. It cannot say whether a buyer would notice, or which of your reasons to buy actually land. A single check also moves several points between runs, so read the band and the ranking, not the last digit.

Your highest-impact changes

  1. 1
    Table stakesYour hero copy says “The easy-to-use intranet”.

    Simpplr, Staffbase and Workvivo say it too (75% of the set). Buyers may still need it, but shared ground cannot carry your hero — move it lower and give that space to something only you can say.

  2. 2
    Table stakesYour section copy says “Keep your team aligned and informed with software built for today's dispersed workforce”.

    Keep the fact, lose the position: simpplr, Staffbase, lumapps.com and Workvivo all say it too, and your section is spending its first impression on the same territory as theirs.

  3. 3
    Table stakesYour section copy says “Simplify communications”.

    This is the set's common ground — Simpplr, Staffbase, lumapps.com and Workvivo all say it too. It will not set you apart wherever it sits, and in the section it costs you the one place a distinctive claim would be read.

  4. 4
    Table stakesYour section copy says “Centralize knowledge”.

    A buyer with three tabs open reads a version of this on every one of them. Say it further down for the readers who need it; the section should carry a claim they will only find here.

  5. 5
    Table stakesYour section copy says “4.7 stars 100+ reviews”.

    True of you and true of them: Simpplr, lumapps.com and Workvivo say it too (75% of the set). That is why it decides nothing, and why the section is the wrong place to spend it.

  6. 6
    Table stakesYour section copy says “It's been such a game changer – the traffic is constant, and everyone loves it”.

    In the section: Simpplr, Staffbase and lumapps.com say it too (75% of the set). Buyers may still need it, but shared ground cannot carry your section — move it lower and give that space to something only you can say.

  7. 7
    Table stakesYour section copy says “Recognized as a leading intranet vendor”.

    In the section: Keep the fact, lose the position: simpplr, lumapps.com and Workvivo say it too (75% of the set), and your section is spending its first impression on the same territory as theirs.

  8. 8
    Table stakesYour section copy says “ThoughtFarmer is trusted by industry leaders”.

    In the section: True of you and true of them: Staffbase, lumapps.com and Workvivo say it too (75% of the set). That is why it decides nothing, and why the section is the wrong place to spend it.

  9. 9
    Surface“Banking intranet solutions” is yours alone, and buyers weigh it.

    Nobody in the set says this. It sits in body copy, where few readers reach it — worth testing higher up the page; only buyers can tell you whether it lands.

The only way to know if it matters.

This report can tell you where your messaging overlaps. It cannot tell you whether a buyer would care, or which of your reasons to buy actually land. Put the page in front of real B2B buyers in your target market and ask them.

Test it with real buyers
Trusted by
HubSpotRingCentralShopifyCognismPaddleVeeamRipplingMiro