Clarity
Do they understand what you do?
Strong12 of 15
12 could name what kind of product this is, unprompted.
Saved report, kept for 60 days — expires in 56 days. Re-opening it is free.
01
Your verdict
Relevance
Can they tell what it solves, and who it's for?
Strong13 of 1513 could quickly tell what problem it solves and who it is for.
Value
Do they actually want it?
Strong13 of 1513 would take a meeting to learn more.
Differentiation
Fix firstIs there a reason to pick you over the alternatives?
Mixed11 of 1511 could name a reason to pick you over a similar option.
See what they thought you were
Your page describes: accounting software. They said:
- 2×AI-driven ERP / finance automation platformwrong
- 2×AI-powered accounting/ERP platformmatches
- 2×AI-powered multi-entity accounting/ERP platformmatches
- 1×AI-augmented accounting/ERP platformmatches
- 1×AI-powered accounting/close automation platformmatches
- 1×AI-powered ERP / finance automation platformwrong
6 couldn't name one; 3 named the wrong one; 6 got it right.
Four separate measures, not stages: all 15 personas answered all four questions. Each square is one persona.
Additional signalBrand alignment9 of 15MixedShow finding ▸
Five respondents flagged euro pricing and thresholds, Nordic/EMEA-only proof points, and an SMB tone as signals the product targets smaller European companies rather than their organisation. Not one of the four layers, and it does not affect the scores above or the order to fix them in.
These are 15 simulated buyers. Want 15 real ones?
Test with humans02
Fix these firstFix these first
Three edits, in the order that matters.
The first is on your weakest layer, the second on the next, the third on the layer the most buyers had a problem with. Each says what to change on the page and why, with one simulated answer behind it.
State what Light does that BlackLine and e-conomic do not.
Why: "Every finance system ever built records the past. Light runs the business." is a slogan, not a differentiator against the tools buyers are comparing. Name the concrete difference: agents executing under policy versus reconciliation software that reports on…
3 of 15 raised this
“A named comparison to e-conomic specifically, or a short line on how a business our size migrates its existing chart of accounts and history without a six-month project”
Chief Financial Officer, SaaS · 5000+ employeessimulated Moves DifferentiationGive a reason to choose youPull the close memo above the logo wall.
Why: The close memo — exceptions, intercompany eliminated, reconciled to zero — is the only place the product becomes visible, and it sits far down the page. Move it near the top so the mechanism precedes the claims.
4 of 15 raised this
“on a first pass you can't tell if an app is a module you configure or a screen an agent runs for you - that line only got…” Show full quote
“on a first pass you can't tell if an app is a module you configure or a screen an agent runs for you - that line only got clear once I read the agents/policy section”
Head of Finance, Fintech · 201-500 employeessimulated Moves ClarityShow the product earlyAdd a second customer case at multi-entity, mid-market scale.
Why: Alva Labs is the only reference and reads as a startup story. Add a customer with 500–1,000 employees or several legal entities, with the close time before and after.
5 of 15 raised this
“beyond Alva Labs there's no second case study at anything like our scale (201-500 employees, multiple DACH entities)”
Chief Financial Officer, Fintech · 201-500 employeessimulated Moves ValueProof next to the claim
Keep these · 2
These landed. Keep the wording when you edit around it.
- Keep · Clarity
The close memo example is the one thing that made the product concrete
“If it actually did what the close memo example describes — close on day one, revenue recognized across four entities, intercompany eliminated, reconciliation to zero, only two exceptions…” Show full quote
“If it actually did what the close memo example describes — close on day one, revenue recognized across four entities, intercompany eliminated, reconciliation to zero, only two exceptions kicked to a human — that would genuinely change my life.”
VP of Finance, AI/ML · 51-200 employeessimulated - Keep · Relevance
The problem statement lands and positions the product as the step up from Xero/QuickBooks
“The "Outgrowing Xero?" banner at the very top and the "Every finance system ever built records the past. Light runs the business" line told me immediately this is…” Show full quote
“The "Outgrowing Xero?" banner at the very top and the "Every finance system ever built records the past. Light runs the business" line told me immediately this is a step-up product for companies leaving Xero/QuickBooks-tier tools”
Chief Financial Officer, Fintech · 201-500 employeessimulated
03
All recommendations
Differentiation
Mixed11 of 15Moves DifferentiationAnswer the live objection
Add a migration line under the Xero/QuickBooks banner.
Why: The step-up positioning lands but stops at an event registration. Say what moving costs — data migration, timeline, parallel-run period — so the switch feels survivable.
3 of 15 raised this
“A named comparison to e-conomic specifically, or a short line on how a business our size migrates its existing chart of accounts and history without a six-month project”
Moves DifferentiationGive a reason to choose you
Move SOC and GDPR badges below the mechanism, not the close.
Why: SOC 1, SOC 2 and GDPR are table stakes every competitor claims, and they currently occupy the page's final persuasive slot. Give that space to the close memo and exception log, the one thing competitors cannot copy from the page.
3 of 15 raised this
“A named comparison to e-conomic specifically, or a short line on how a business our size migrates its existing chart of accounts and history without a six-month project”
Clarity
Strong12 of 15- Shown abovePull the close memo above the logo wall.
Moves ClarityPlain language
Cut "runs the business" and "agents that heal" for literal descriptions.
Why: These taglines are undefined and clash with the precise mechanics elsewhere. Say what actually happens: agents post accruals, chase invoices and write the close memo under policy thresholds you set.
4 of 15 raised this
“on a first pass you can't tell if an app is a module you configure or a screen an agent runs for you - that line only got…” Show full quote
“on a first pass you can't tell if an app is a module you configure or a screen an agent runs for you - that line only got clear once I read the agents/policy section”
Moves ClarityHeadings stand alone
Define Apps versus Agents in one sentence each.
Why: "Adapts to the business" and "Operates the business" do not tell a reader which is which, and the distinction only emerges after reading the policy table. State plainly that apps are installable functions and agents are workers that execute them.
4 of 15 raised this
“on a first pass you can't tell if an app is a module you configure or a screen an agent runs for you - that line only got…” Show full quote
“on a first pass you can't tell if an app is a module you configure or a screen an agent runs for you - that line only got clear once I read the agents/policy section”
Relevance
Strong13 of 15Moves RelevanceName the audience
Name the buyer in the hero, not the holding-structures section.
Why: "Built for global businesses" arrives late; before that the audience must be reconstructed from clues. Put the description — finance leaders running multiple entities across countries — beside "Month-end is a non-event."
2 of 15 raised this
“It's not spelled out cleanly — I had to piece it together. The "Outgrowing Xero?" banner at the top is the only explicit signal of who this is…” Show full quote
“It's not spelled out cleanly — I had to piece it together. The "Outgrowing Xero?" banner at the top is the only explicit signal of who this is for, and even that's just an ad for a webinar, not the page itself making the pitch.”
Value
Strong13 of 15Moves ValueSpecifics beat superlatives
Attach a number to the close claim.
Why: "Month-end is a non-event" and "closed on the first working day" carry no benchmark. State days-to-close before and after, entity count and transaction volume, so a reader can test it against their own scale.
5 of 15 raised this
“beyond Alva Labs there's no second case study at anything like our scale (201-500 employees, multiple DACH entities)”
Brand alignment
Mixed9 of 15Moves Brand alignmentProof next to the claim
Add a US or multi-region proof point beside the customer logos.
Why: Nordic and EMEA logos plus a Swedish reference read as SMB-European. Name a customer operating US entities, or state the countries and standards Light files in, next to the wall.
3 of 15 raised this
“the euro-centric pricing and the thin, single-customer proof (Alva Labs, a small Nordic company) tell me they're not yet built out for a 1000+ person US company at…” Show full quote
“the euro-centric pricing and the thin, single-customer proof (Alva Labs, a small Nordic company) tell me they're not yet built out for a 1000+ person US company at my scale”
Moves Brand alignmentName the audience
Replace euro-only approval thresholds with the reader's currency.
Why: The approval policy table runs €50,000 / €500,000, signalling a European product to US and non-euro buyers. Localise the thresholds or show dollar figures alongside them.
3 of 15 raised this
“the euro-centric pricing and the thin, single-customer proof (Alva Labs, a small Nordic company) tell me they're not yet built out for a 1000+ person US company at…” Show full quote
“the euro-centric pricing and the thin, single-customer proof (Alva Labs, a small Nordic company) tell me they're not yet built out for a 1000+ person US company at my scale”
Moves Brand alignmentSpecifics beat superlatives
Replace "The world's most demanding finance teams" with the actual segment.
Why: The superlative over a wall of startup logos undercuts itself for enterprise readers. Say who these companies are — multi-entity, multi-country, headcount range — so scale is claimed by facts, not adjectives.
3 of 15 raised this
“the euro-centric pricing and the thin, single-customer proof (Alva Labs, a small Nordic company) tell me they're not yet built out for a 1000+ person US company at…” Show full quote
“the euro-centric pricing and the thin, single-customer proof (Alva Labs, a small Nordic company) tell me they're not yet built out for a 1000+ person US company at my scale”
04
Buyer evidence
Biggest risks
A deliberately adversarial read of the same answers. Each claim was checked back against what the personas said and dropped if nothing supported it.
- high
The page's only credible asset is a single artefact, and everything around it undercuts it
Nine respondents named the close memo as the only place the mechanism was visible, while four found the slogans undefined and two had to infer the audience from scattered clues. One example is carrying the whole page.
- high
One customer story makes the proof section a liability rather than support
Six respondents said a single reference is insufficient and asked for a second case at 500-1000 employees or comparable multi-entity scale; two more noted claims carry no benchmarkable metrics. Nothing on the page survives due diligence.
- high
The page loses head-to-head evaluations by default because it never names a competitor
Three respondents asked for a BlackLine side-by-side on a US customer or an e-conomic migration path and dismissed SOC/GDPR as table stakes. The only testable comparison came from the close memo, not the messaging.
- high
Euro pricing and Nordic proof points disqualify the product before the value argument is read
Five respondents read euro thresholds, EMEA-only proof and an SMB tone as evidence the product targets smaller European companies, and six wanted mid-market references instead of startup logos. Geography and scale signals contradict the enterprise pitch.
- medium
The Xero/QuickBooks step-up framing caps the product below the buyers it needs
Three respondents found the step-up-from-Xero/QuickBooks positioning immediately legible, while five read the tone as SMB and six asked for 500-1000 employee proof. The clearest message on the page is the wrong one.
- medium
Marketing language actively destroys comprehension the page had already earned
Four respondents flagged 'agents that heal' and 'runs the business' as undefined and one noted the taglines conflict with concrete product mechanics. The slogans compete with the explanation rather than summarising it.
Differentiation
No differentiator is named against the competitors respondents already have in mind
3 of 15
“A named comparison to e-conomic specifically, or a short line on how a business our size migrates its existing chart of accounts and history without a six-month project”
Chief Financial Officer, SaaS · 5000+ employeessimulated See all 3 comments
“to win me over Light would need a side-by-side showing faster close and cleaner exception handling than BlackLine on a multi-entity US customer, not just a cleverer approval…” Show full quote
“to win me over Light would need a side-by-side showing faster close and cleaner exception handling than BlackLine on a multi-entity US customer, not just a cleverer approval table”
Head of Finance, Climate tech · 1001-5000 employeessimulated “the SOC 1/SOC 2/GDPR badges and the customer logo wall wouldn't tip a decision either way — every vendor in this space has those now, they're table stakes,…” Show full quote
“the SOC 1/SOC 2/GDPR badges and the customer logo wall wouldn't tip a decision either way — every vendor in this space has those now, they're table stakes, not differentiators.”
VP of Finance, AI/ML · 51-200 employeessimulated
Clarity
Slogan language obscures the mechanism the page elsewhere explains well
4 of 15
“on a first pass you can't tell if an app is a module you configure or a screen an agent runs for you - that line only got…” Show full quote
“on a first pass you can't tell if an app is a module you configure or a screen an agent runs for you - that line only got clear once I read the agents/policy section”
Head of Finance, Fintech · 201-500 employeessimulated See all 4 comments
“the phrase "agents that heal instead of age" and "one system" tripped me up briefly — those are marketing flourishes, not mechanism”
VP of Finance, Climate tech · 1001-5000 employeessimulated “"Every finance system ever built records the past. Light runs the business" is repeated three times but never defined, so I kept expecting a concrete mechanism and got…” Show full quote
“"Every finance system ever built records the past. Light runs the business" is repeated three times but never defined, so I kept expecting a concrete mechanism and got poetry instead.”
Head of Finance, SaaS · 5000+ employeessimulated “the "Month-end is a non-event" and "Light runs the business" lines feel like they were written by a brand team layered on top of a product team, and…” Show full quote
“the "Month-end is a non-event" and "Light runs the business" lines feel like they were written by a brand team layered on top of a product team, and that mismatch — grandiose tagline vs. concrete mechanics — is exactly the kind of thing that makes me trust the detail and discount the slogan.”
VP of Finance, AI/ML · 51-200 employeessimulated Claims are asserted without benchmarkable numbers
1 of 15
“less clear on proof it actually delivers a two-hour close with zero exceptions at our scale; I'd want a real customer walkthrough with numbers, not the Alva Labs…” Show full quote
“less clear on proof it actually delivers a two-hour close with zero exceptions at our scale; I'd want a real customer walkthrough with numbers, not the Alva Labs quote alone”
Head of Finance, Climate tech · 1001-5000 employeessimulated See all 2 comments
“The word "scale" itself, plus the vague quantitative claims like "zero exceptions" and "non-event" with no headcount, entity count, or transaction volume attached”
Head of Finance, Climate tech · 1001-5000 employeessimulated The close memo example is the one thing that made the product concrete
6 of 15 · what worked
“If it actually did what the close memo example describes — close on day one, revenue recognized across four entities, intercompany eliminated, reconciliation to zero, only two exceptions…” Show full quote
“If it actually did what the close memo example describes — close on day one, revenue recognized across four entities, intercompany eliminated, reconciliation to zero, only two exceptions kicked to a human — that would genuinely change my life.”
VP of Finance, AI/ML · 51-200 employeessimulated See all 9 comments
“the "close memo" example where the month closes on day one, revenue's recognized across four entities, intercompany's eliminated, and only two exceptions needed a human, is the kind…” Show full quote
“the "close memo" example where the month closes on day one, revenue's recognized across four entities, intercompany's eliminated, and only two exceptions needed a human, is the kind of thing that would actually save my controller's team real hours”
Chief Financial Officer, Fintech · 201-500 employeessimulated “The close memo example (revenue recognized across four entities, intercompany eliminated, two exceptions flagged for a human) is the one concrete bit that actually tells me what it…” Show full quote
“The close memo example (revenue recognized across four entities, intercompany eliminated, two exceptions flagged for a human) is the one concrete bit that actually tells me what it does day-to-day”
VP of Finance, AI/ML · 51-200 employeessimulated “"The month is closed, on the first working day after period end... Two exceptions needed a human. A duplicate vendor invoice, voided and the vendor notified. A missing…” Show full quote
“"The month is closed, on the first working day after period end... Two exceptions needed a human. A duplicate vendor invoice, voided and the vendor notified. A missing tax code on one German receipt, posted after your confirmation on Tuesday." That's the first spot on the page where they show their work”
Head of Finance, Climate tech · 1001-5000 employeessimulated “"Revenue recognized across all four entities. Intercompany eliminated at group. Every bank account reconciled to zero difference... Two exceptions needed a human" is specific enough to test against…” Show full quote
“"Revenue recognized across all four entities. Intercompany eliminated at group. Every bank account reconciled to zero difference... Two exceptions needed a human" is specific enough to test against a competitor: I can literally ask both vendors to run that exact scenario live.”
VP of Finance, AI/ML · 51-200 employeessimulated “a multi-entity general ledger, a suite of finance apps (mileage, filings, inventory, FP&A, audit), and AI agents that actually execute close tasks — chasing invoices, matching receipts, posting…” Show full quote
“a multi-entity general ledger, a suite of finance apps (mileage, filings, inventory, FP&A, audit), and AI agents that actually execute close tasks — chasing invoices, matching receipts, posting accruals, writing close memos, subject to approval policies by amount”
VP of Finance, Climate tech · 1001-5000 employeessimulated “"Revenue recognized across all four entities... Every bank account reconciled to zero difference" — that's concrete enough to know it's an automated close/consolidation tool, not just vague AI…” Show full quote
“"Revenue recognized across all four entities... Every bank account reconciled to zero difference" — that's concrete enough to know it's an automated close/consolidation tool, not just vague AI hype.”
Head of Finance, SaaS · 5000+ employeessimulated “"Two exceptions needed a human. A duplicate vendor invoice, voided and the vendor notified. A missing tax code on one German receipt, posted after your confirmation on Tuesday."…” Show full quote
“"Two exceptions needed a human. A duplicate vendor invoice, voided and the vendor notified. A missing tax code on one German receipt, posted after your confirmation on Tuesday." That's the first place on the page that reads like a real transaction log rather than a marketing claim”
Head of Finance, Fintech · 201-500 employeessimulated “Cutting our actual close cycle from days to under 24 hours with a clean, auditable exception trail I can hand to our external auditors without extra rework —…” Show full quote
“Cutting our actual close cycle from days to under 24 hours with a clean, auditable exception trail I can hand to our external auditors without extra rework — if that holds at our entity count, it justifies the switching cost”
Head of Finance, Climate tech · 1001-5000 employeessimulated
Relevance
The problem statement lands and positions the product as the step up from Xero/QuickBooks
3 of 15 · what worked
“The "Outgrowing Xero?" banner at the very top and the "Every finance system ever built records the past. Light runs the business" line told me immediately this is…” Show full quote
“The "Outgrowing Xero?" banner at the very top and the "Every finance system ever built records the past. Light runs the business" line told me immediately this is a step-up product for companies leaving Xero/QuickBooks-tier tools”
Chief Financial Officer, Fintech · 201-500 employeessimulated See all 3 comments
“"Built for global businesses. Holding structures, subsidiaries in several countries, more than one accounting standard, auditors who ask hard questions" spells out the buyer directly”
Head of Finance, Climate tech · 1001-5000 employeessimulated “The problem statement is right there in "Every finance system ever built records the past. Light runs the business" — that's the hook, and it's repeated enough times…” Show full quote
“The problem statement is right there in "Every finance system ever built records the past. Light runs the business" — that's the hook, and it's repeated enough times it clearly is the pitch.”
Chief Financial Officer, SaaS · 5000+ employeessimulated Others had to infer the target audience from scattered clues
2 of 15
“It's not spelled out cleanly — I had to piece it together. The "Outgrowing Xero?" banner at the top is the only explicit signal of who this is…” Show full quote
“It's not spelled out cleanly — I had to piece it together. The "Outgrowing Xero?" banner at the top is the only explicit signal of who this is for, and even that's just an ad for a webinar, not the page itself making the pitch.”
VP of Finance, AI/ML · 51-200 employeessimulated See all 2 comments
“the "Built for global businesses. Holding structures, subsidiaries in several countries, more than one accounting standard, auditors who ask hard questions" section tells you exactly who this is…” Show full quote
“the "Built for global businesses. Holding structures, subsidiaries in several countries, more than one accounting standard, auditors who ask hard questions" section tells you exactly who this is for”
Head of Finance, Fintech · 201-500 employeessimulated
Value
The single reference customer is the page's biggest credibility gap
5 of 15
“beyond Alva Labs there's no second case study at anything like our scale (201-500 employees, multiple DACH entities)”
Chief Financial Officer, Fintech · 201-500 employeessimulated See all 6 comments
“I'd need named references at our scale (not just logos like Alva Labs, which reads as a small startup case study, three countries, no headcount mentioned), and I'd…” Show full quote
“I'd need named references at our scale (not just logos like Alva Labs, which reads as a small startup case study, three countries, no headcount mentioned), and I'd want to see the SOC 1/SOC 2 reports”
VP of Finance, Biotech/Health-tech · 501-1000 employeessimulated “If I'm picking between two similar vendors, the one that shows me a reference customer my size wins; Light doesn't do that here, it just shows logos and…” Show full quote
“If I'm picking between two similar vendors, the one that shows me a reference customer my size wins; Light doesn't do that here, it just shows logos and one small-company quote.”
VP of Finance, Biotech/Health-tech · 501-1000 employeessimulated “the page proves it with one story, Alva Labs, three countries - I need to know Alva's transaction volume and entity complexity versus ours before I'll believe it…” Show full quote
“the page proves it with one story, Alva Labs, three countries - I need to know Alva's transaction volume and entity complexity versus ours before I'll believe it generalizes”
Head of Finance, Fintech · 201-500 employeessimulated “I'd want a reference call with a company our size and actual close-cycle-time numbers before I'd give this thirty minutes — as it stands, it's a "send me…” Show full quote
“I'd want a reference call with a company our size and actual close-cycle-time numbers before I'd give this thirty minutes — as it stands, it's a "send me the case studies" reply, not a calendar invite.”
Chief Financial Officer, Biotech/Health-tech · 501-1000 employeessimulated “the social proof (Alva Labs, "Finance Manager," three countries) suggests they're still mostly selling to smaller multi-entity companies than mine — 1000+ employees is a different order of…” Show full quote
“the social proof (Alva Labs, "Finance Manager," three countries) suggests they're still mostly selling to smaller multi-entity companies than mine — 1000+ employees is a different order of complexity”
VP of Finance, Climate tech · 1001-5000 employeessimulated
Brand alignment
European framing reads as not-yet-ready for US enterprise
3 of 15
“the euro-centric pricing and the thin, single-customer proof (Alva Labs, a small Nordic company) tell me they're not yet built out for a 1000+ person US company at…” Show full quote
“the euro-centric pricing and the thin, single-customer proof (Alva Labs, a small Nordic company) tell me they're not yet built out for a 1000+ person US company at my scale”
Head of Finance, Climate tech · 1001-5000 employeessimulated See all 4 comments
“this reads like a company that started by poaching Xero customers and is now reaching upmarket toward businesses like mine”
Head of Finance, Climate tech · 1001-5000 employeessimulated “A named US-based, 1000+ employee multi-entity customer with GAAP (not just IFRS/local EU standards) and a real close-time-before-and-after number — right now it's Nordic-flavored proof and euro thresholds”
Head of Finance, Climate tech · 1001-5000 employeessimulated “That tells me they're selling primarily to fast-growing mid-market/scale-up finance teams, not to a 501-1000-person SAP shop like mine yet.”
Chief Financial Officer, Biotech/Health-tech · 501-1000 employeessimulated
05
How this works
Who we simulated (15 personas)
15 AI-simulated personas matched to your target market. Each answered independently, without seeing your goal, the scoring criteria, or each other’s answers. Attribution is role, industry and company size only.
Chief Financial OfficerFintech · 201-500 employeesDACH
VP of FinanceBiotech/Health-tech · 501-1000 employeesNetherlands
Head of FinanceClimate tech · 1001-5000 employeesUS
Chief Financial OfficerSaaS · 5000+ employeesUK
VP of FinanceAI/ML · 51-200 employeesIreland
Head of FinanceFintech · 201-500 employeesNordics
Chief Financial OfficerBiotech/Health-tech · 501-1000 employeesDACH
VP of FinanceClimate tech · 1001-5000 employeesNetherlands
Head of FinanceSaaS · 5000+ employeesUS
Chief Financial OfficerAI/ML · 51-200 employeesUK
VP of FinanceFintech · 201-500 employeesIreland
Head of FinanceBiotech/Health-tech · 501-1000 employeesNordics
Chief Financial OfficerClimate tech · 1001-5000 employeesDACH
VP of FinanceSaaS · 5000+ employeesNetherlands
Head of FinanceAI/ML · 51-200 employeesUS
Methodology
Every answer on this page was written by an AI model role-playing a buyer profile, scored on Wynter’s B2B Message Layers framework. The personas were sampled in code across role, industry, company size and behavioral traits; the model wrote only the answers. Scores arrive through fixed verdict categories and the counts are computed in our own code, so no number here was written by a model.
Score details: the count and the strength
The count is how many personas cleared the bar on each question. A yes can be unhesitating or come with reservations; the scorecard counts both as a yes, and this is the only place the difference is shown. Per layer:
- Clarity: 12 of 15, all with reservations
- Relevance: 13 of 15, 1 without hesitation, 12 with reservations
- Value: 13 of 15, all with reservations
- Differentiation: 11 of 15, all with reservations
These answers are AI-simulated and directional. Validate anything you’re betting on with real buyers, your ICPs.
Your next 3 moves
- 1.State what Light does that BlackLine and e-conomic do not.
- 2.Pull the close memo above the logo wall.
- 3.Add a second customer case at multi-entity, mid-market scale.
See what real buyers say.
A detailed, section-by-section message test report from verified B2B professionals who are actually in-market for what you sell.
Trusted by
RetentionThis report is kept for 60 days, until 2 Nov 2026, then deleted along with the personas, their answers and everything derived from them. The link stays live for that whole period so it can be shared or revisited, and stops working afterwards.
The email address it was requested from is kept beyond that, because it subscribes you to the newsletter — that was the price of the report. You can unsubscribe in one click from any issue, which stops the email without affecting a report still inside its 60 days. The public report page never shows the requester’s address.
The email address it was requested from is kept beyond that, because it subscribes you to the newsletter — that was the price of the report. You can unsubscribe in one click from any issue, which stops the email without affecting a report still inside its 60 days. The public report page never shows the requester’s address.