# Message test — https://example.org/

After reading your page, only 1 of 15 personas could quickly tell what problem it solves and who it is for.

- **Page tested:** https://example.org/
- **Audience tested against:** Product marketing managers who own positioning at B2B SaaS companies
- **Personas:** 15 simulated
- **Report:** https://grader.wynter.com/r/example-domain-mt0r18

> These answers are generated by AI, scored on Wynter's B2B Message
> Layers framework using behaviorally-diverse simulated personas. The
> methodology is real and the critique is directional. What a simulated
> persona cannot have is a live budget, a renewal coming up, or a boss
> asking about this quarter.

---

## 01 · The scores

Every persona answered all four questions. These are four independent
proportions of the same panel, not stages of a funnel.

| Layer | Question | Cleared the bar | Strength | Of those who passed |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1. Clarity | Do they understand what you do? | 11/15 | 68% | 5 without hesitation, 3 with reservations |
| 2. Relevance | Can they tell what it solves, and who it's for? | 1/15 | 30% | with reservations |
| 3. Value | Do they actually want it? | 7/15 | 54% | 3 without hesitation, 4 with reservations |
| 4. Differentiation | Is there a reason to pick you over the alternatives? | 5/15 | 41% | 2 without hesitation, 3 with reservations |

**Brand alignment** (a side metric, not one of the four layers) — 8/15, 65% strength (6 without hesitation, 2 with reservations). Does the page read like the company you actually are?

**Fix first: Relevance.** Earliest failing layer, walking the sequence in order — not simply the lowest score.

---

## The rest of this report is locked

Enter the six-digit code we emailed to unlock the fix list, the
verbatims and the critic pass: https://grader.wynter.com/r/example-domain-mt0r18