Message test · Koalatative

Only 2 of 15 buyers could say why they would pick Koalatative over an alternative.

https://koalatative.com/15 AI-simulated buyers

Your message needs work: they know what it is and who it's for, but not why it's worth their time or why to pick you.

Simulated responsesNo humans answered these questions. Every quote below was written by an AI model role-playing a buyer profile.
Share score cardDownload as markdown
Saved report, kept for 60 days — expires in 2 days. Re-opening it is free.
01

Your verdict

  • Clarity

    Do they understand what you do?

    Strong15 of 15

    15 could name what kind of product this is, unprompted.

  • Relevance

    Can they tell what it solves, and who it's for?

    Strong15 of 15

    15 could quickly tell what problem it solves and who it is for.

  • Value

    Do they actually want it?

    Weak7 of 15

    7 would take a meeting to learn more.

  • Differentiation

    Fix first

    Is there a reason to pick you over the alternatives?

    Fail2 of 15

    2 could name a reason to pick you over a similar option.

See what they thought you were

Your page describes: conversion rate optimization. They said:

  • 5×Conversion Rate Optimization (CRO) agencymatches
  • 3×CRO (conversion rate optimization) agencymatches
  • 1×CRO / A/B testing agencymatches
  • 1×CRO / conversion optimization agencymatches

5 couldn't name one; 10 got it right.

Four separate measures, not stages: all 15 personas answered all four questions. Each square is one persona.

Additional signalBrand alignment4 of 15FailShow finding ▸

Six points said the copy carries no enterprise scale signals and raises doubt the playbook scales to larger organizations. Respondents read the brand as a small, mid-market, founder-led shop. Not one of the four layers, and it does not affect the scores above or the order to fix them in.

These are 15 simulated buyers. Want 15 real ones?

Test with humans
02

Fix these first

Fix these first

Three edits, in the order that matters.

The first is on your weakest layer, the second on the next, the third on the layer the most buyers had a problem with. Each says what to change on the page and why, with one simulated answer behind it.

  1. Rewrite the six subheads to carry the claim alone.

    Why: "Alignment with business objectives" and "Balancing rigor with speed" could sit on any agency site. Make each subhead state the specific practice — "We work in your stack, not ours" — so a scanner gets the argument without body copy.

    Moves Differentiation
    Headings stand alone

  2. Add a named client result beside the revenue-gains claim.

    Why: "deliver revenue gains in weeks, not months" sits alone with no number, client or before/after. Put one named engagement with a lift figure and timeframe directly under it.

    9 of 15 raised this

    “there's no baseline, no case study, no client logo, no "we lifted X client's conversion by Y%" to anchor that claim, so I can't tell if "weeks" means…” Show full quote
    “there's no baseline, no case study, no client logo, no "we lifted X client's conversion by Y%" to anchor that claim, so I can't tell if "weeks" means a 2% lift or a 20% one”
    Senior Marketing Manager, B2B Software · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    Moves Value
    Proof next to the claim

  3. Separate the two service tiers visually and label them.

    Why: "done for you" and "done with you" run together in one block, forcing a re-read. Give each its own heading and a line on who picks it.

    6 of 15 raised this

    “"inconsistent or unreliable A/B test results" isn't addressed head-on anywhere; I'd need a case study or methodology detail”
    Senior Marketing Manager, B2B Software · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    Moves Relevance
    Headings stand alone

Keep these · 2

These landed. Keep the wording when you edit around it.

  1. Keep · Differentiation

    The 'no discovery period' and anti-agency lines are the copy that lands

    “The "no 90-day discovery period, strategy set before we even get rolling" line and "we'll adapt to your stack" are the two things that would actually tip me…” Show full quote
    “The "no 90-day discovery period, strategy set before we even get rolling" line and "we'll adapt to your stack" are the two things that would actually tip me toward them over a generic competitor”
    Director of Marketing, SaaS · 1001-5000 employeessimulated
  2. Keep · Clarity

    The two-tier service structure is understood on first read

    “"done for you High-ROI conversion rate optimization" for those who want it fully outsourced, and "done with you Accelerate internal experimentation capability" for teams building their own program…” Show full quote
    “"done for you High-ROI conversion rate optimization" for those who want it fully outsourced, and "done with you Accelerate internal experimentation capability" for teams building their own program in-house. That's not buried, it's right up top in two clear tracks.”
    Head of Growth, B2B Software · 201-500 employeessimulated
03

All recommendations

Differentiation

Fail2 of 15
Moves DifferentiationFront-load the meaning

Move "No 90-day discovery period" into the hero.

Why: The anti-agency promises are buried six items down a "What's it's like working with us" list. Lead with no discovery period and working in your existing stack — that is the reason to pick this over any CRO shop.

Moves DifferentiationGive a reason to choose you

Say what work you refuse to do.

Why: "No slide deck theater" is the sharpest line and it stops at presentations. Extend the anti-pattern list — no vanity tests, no retainer for research nobody reads — since that specificity is what readers repeat back.

Value

Weak7 of 15
Moves ValueSpecifics beat superlatives

Replace "High-ROI" and "world-class" with measured outcomes.

Why: Both phrases are self-awarded grades. Swap in what a client actually got: tests shipped per month, win rate, revenue per visitor movement.

9 of 15 raised this

“there's no baseline, no case study, no client logo, no "we lifted X client's conversion by Y%" to anchor that claim, so I can't tell if "weeks" means…” Show full quote
“there's no baseline, no case study, no client logo, no "we lifted X client's conversion by Y%" to anchor that claim, so I can't tell if "weeks" means a 2% lift or a 20% one”
Senior Marketing Manager, B2B Software · 501-1000 employeessimulated
Moves ValueConcrete over abstract

State what the first 30 days produce.

Why: "start delivering outcomes right away" never says what arrives or when. Name the deliverables of month one — tests live, roadmap, tracking fixed — so buyers can price the engagement.

9 of 15 raised this

“there's no baseline, no case study, no client logo, no "we lifted X client's conversion by Y%" to anchor that claim, so I can't tell if "weeks" means…” Show full quote
“there's no baseline, no case study, no client logo, no "we lifted X client's conversion by Y%" to anchor that claim, so I can't tell if "weeks" means a 2% lift or a 20% one”
Senior Marketing Manager, B2B Software · 501-1000 employeessimulated

Clarity

Strong15 of 15
Moves ClarityPlain language

Label Katsed as a side project, not a service.

Why: The episode title "we're building AB test analysis software" makes readers ask whether they are buying an agency or a tool. One line separating the podcast content from the service offering settles it.

4 of 15 raised this

“There's a mention of "Katsed," some A/B test analysis software they're building on the side, but that's clearly secondary to the core service. So this isn't a "product"…” Show full quote
“There's a mention of "Katsed," some A/B test analysis software they're building on the side, but that's clearly secondary to the core service. So this isn't a "product" in the SaaS sense at all — it's a services shop”
Senior Marketing Manager, B2B Software · 501-1000 employeessimulated
Additional signal

Brand alignment

Fail4 of 15
Moves Brand alignment

Cut "boutique" from the opening line.

Why: "we're a boutique CRO agency" pre-disqualifies the page for anyone with a budget approval chain. Keep founder access as the benefit — direct senior attention — without the word that signals small.

5 of 15 raised this

“"boutique" and "founders-led" signals small/scrappy, which makes me wonder if they can handle our volume of tests and stakeholders”
VP of Marketing, E-commerce · 5000+ employeessimulated
Moves Brand alignmentName the audience

Name the buyer's role and company size upfront.

Why: Nothing says who this is for. Add a line naming the reader — ecommerce growth lead, VP of Digital at a company running X tests a month — so the right buyer self-selects instead of guessing.

5 of 15 raised this

“"boutique" and "founders-led" signals small/scrappy, which makes me wonder if they can handle our volume of tests and stakeholders”
VP of Marketing, E-commerce · 5000+ employeessimulated
Moves Brand alignmentPlain language

Raise the register of "This is business, not life or death."

Why: The casual aside undercuts the statistical-rigor claim it sits inside and reads as practitioner banter to a budget holder. State the tradeoff plainly: which confidence thresholds you use and why.

5 of 15 raised this

“"boutique" and "founders-led" signals small/scrappy, which makes me wonder if they can handle our volume of tests and stakeholders”
VP of Marketing, E-commerce · 5000+ employeessimulated
04

Buyer evidence

Biggest risks

A deliberately adversarial read of the same answers. Each claim was checked back against what the personas said and dropped if nothing supported it.

  • high

    The differentiation that lands is unverifiable, so the page's strongest copy is also its most fragile

    Five points repeat the no-discovery-period and anti-agency promises unprompted, but fourteen points across value, clarity and differentiation cite zero case studies, logos or before/after numbers. Memorable claims with no proof read as bravado.

  • high

    The page cannot survive a first call, let alone a procurement cycle

    Nine of fifteen respondents found no proof for any results claim and several said they would not advance past a first call; three more said the tone is pitched at peers rather than budget holders.

  • high

    The page actively disqualifies itself from enterprise deals it appears to want

    Six points read the brand as a small, founder-led mid-market shop with no scale signals, while six more say no buyer size is ever named. The page lets enterprise buyers self-eliminate by default.

  • medium

    Understanding the service structure does not tell anyone whether to buy it

    Four points grasp the two service modes on first read, yet six say the target buyer is implicit with no size calibration. Clear mechanics attached to an unnamed audience produce recall without qualification.

  • medium

    The company's own category is unresolved on the page

    Four points flagged the Katsed software mention as leaving them unsure whether this is an agency or a vendor, and one read the in-house AB test tool as a funding-priority worry. The secondary product undermines the primary pitch.

  • medium

    Voice and buyer are misaligned in the same paragraph

    Three points describe a practitioner-community or hobbyist register mixed with vendor positioning, while six read boutique founder-led signals. The page speaks to operators while asking decision-makers for budget.

Differentiation

  • The 'no discovery period' and anti-agency lines are the copy that lands

    5 of 15 · what worked

    “The "no 90-day discovery period, strategy set before we even get rolling" line and "we'll adapt to your stack" are the two things that would actually tip me…” Show full quote
    “The "no 90-day discovery period, strategy set before we even get rolling" line and "we'll adapt to your stack" are the two things that would actually tip me toward them over a generic competitor”
    Director of Marketing, SaaS · 1001-5000 employeessimulated
    See all 5 comments
    “"no 90-day discovery period" and "no slide deck theater" lines would actually pull me toward them versus a competitor — that's a specific, credible dig at how agencies…” Show full quote
    “"no 90-day discovery period" and "no slide deck theater" lines would actually pull me toward them versus a competitor — that's a specific, credible dig at how agencies like this usually waste the first quarter”
    VP of Marketing, E-commerce · 5000+ employeessimulated
    “Tone-wise it's fine for someone like me — direct, no jargon-soup, "no slide deck theater" and "no 90-day discovery period" are the kind of operator-to-operator lines that land…” Show full quote
    “Tone-wise it's fine for someone like me — direct, no jargon-soup, "no slide deck theater" and "no 90-day discovery period" are the kind of operator-to-operator lines that land — but it still reads generic rather than written for an e-commerce VP of Product specifically”
    VP of Product, E-commerce · 201-500 employeessimulated
    “The "no 90-day discovery period" and "no slide deck theater" lines actually stand out to me — they're specific complaints I've had about past agency engagements”
    VP of Product, E-commerce · 1001-5000 employeessimulated
    “The one thing that'd actually tilt me toward them versus a generic agency is the "No 90-day discovery period" line — "The strategy will be set before we…” Show full quote
    “The one thing that'd actually tilt me toward them versus a generic agency is the "No 90-day discovery period" line — "The strategy will be set before we even get rolling so we can start delivering outcomes right away"”
    Senior Marketing Manager, B2B Software · 5000+ employeessimulated

Value

  • Not a single respondent found proof for any results claim

    9 of 15

    “there's no baseline, no case study, no client logo, no "we lifted X client's conversion by Y%" to anchor that claim, so I can't tell if "weeks" means…” Show full quote
    “there's no baseline, no case study, no client logo, no "we lifted X client's conversion by Y%" to anchor that claim, so I can't tell if "weeks" means a 2% lift or a 20% one”
    Senior Marketing Manager, B2B Software · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    See all 12 comments
    “If a competitor on my shortlist has even one named client with a real percentage lift and timeframe, they win by default — this page gives me tone…” Show full quote
    “If a competitor on my shortlist has even one named client with a real percentage lift and timeframe, they win by default — this page gives me tone and process promises, not evidence.”
    Senior Marketing Manager, B2B Software · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    “there's zero proof on this page: no case study, no client name, no actual before/after conversion lift number. It's all promise, no evidence.”
    Director of Marketing, SaaS · 1001-5000 employeessimulated
    “it's asserted, not proven; there's no case study, no client logo, no "we took X site from Y% to Z% lift" anywhere on this page”
    VP of Marketing, E-commerce · 5000+ employeessimulated
    “there's nothing on the page telling me who's actually used them, what results they got, or what "revenue gains in weeks not months" actually means in dollars”
    Head of Growth, B2B Software · 201-500 employeessimulated
    “there's zero proof on this page: no case study, no client name, no actual lift percentage, just a claim of "statistically valid A/B tests."”
    Director of Product, SaaS · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    “I just don't yet have proof behind "weeks not months" or what their testing methodology actually is”
    VP of Product, E-commerce · 1001-5000 employeessimulated
    “"statistically valid A/B tests" and "weeks, not months" are still just claims on a page; I'd want to see one or two case studies with actual before/after revenue…” Show full quote
    “"statistically valid A/B tests" and "weeks, not months" are still just claims on a page; I'd want to see one or two case studies with actual before/after revenue numbers”
    VP of Product, E-commerce · 1001-5000 employeessimulated
    “there's no case study, no logo, no actual lift number on the page, so I have nothing to check the claim against”
    Senior Marketing Manager, B2B Software · 5000+ employeessimulated
    “"no 90-day discovery period" and "no slide deck theater" lines would actually pull me toward them versus a competitor — that's a specific, credible dig at how agencies…” Show full quote
    “"no 90-day discovery period" and "no slide deck theater" lines would actually pull me toward them versus a competitor — that's a specific, credible dig at how agencies like this usually waste the first quarter”
    VP of Marketing, E-commerce · 5000+ employeessimulated
    “The "no 90-day discovery period" and "no slide deck theater" lines actually stand out to me — they're specific complaints I've had about past agency engagements”
    VP of Product, E-commerce · 1001-5000 employeessimulated
    “"inconsistent or unreliable A/B test results" isn't addressed head-on anywhere; I'd need a case study or methodology detail”
    Senior Marketing Manager, B2B Software · 501-1000 employeessimulated

Clarity

  • The Katsed software product is unexplained and confuses what the company sells

    4 of 15

    “There's a mention of "Katsed," some A/B test analysis software they're building on the side, but that's clearly secondary to the core service. So this isn't a "product"…” Show full quote
    “There's a mention of "Katsed," some A/B test analysis software they're building on the side, but that's clearly secondary to the core service. So this isn't a "product" in the SaaS sense at all — it's a services shop”
    Senior Marketing Manager, B2B Software · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    See all 4 comments
    “the fact that they're mid-build on their own tool ("we're building AB test analysis software") makes me wonder if I'm paying for a service or subsidizing their product…” Show full quote
    “the fact that they're mid-build on their own tool ("we're building AB test analysis software") makes me wonder if I'm paying for a service or subsidizing their product roadmap”
    Director of Product, SaaS · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    “the Katsed mention buried in the podcast blurb — 'we're building AB test analysis software' — that made me pause, because it's dropped in almost as an aside…” Show full quote
    “the Katsed mention buried in the podcast blurb — 'we're building AB test analysis software' — that made me pause, because it's dropped in almost as an aside rather than positioned as a product”
    Senior Marketing Manager, B2B Software · 5000+ employeessimulated
    “That single unexplained noun dropped into an otherwise clear services page is what muddies it.”
    Director of Marketing, SaaS · 201-500 employeessimulated

  • The two-tier service structure is understood on first read

    4 of 15 · what worked

    “"done for you High-ROI conversion rate optimization" for those who want it fully outsourced, and "done with you Accelerate internal experimentation capability" for teams building their own program…” Show full quote
    “"done for you High-ROI conversion rate optimization" for those who want it fully outsourced, and "done with you Accelerate internal experimentation capability" for teams building their own program in-house. That's not buried, it's right up top in two clear tracks.”
    Head of Growth, B2B Software · 201-500 employeessimulated
    See all 2 comments
    “the run-on formatting of "done for you High-ROI conversion rate optimization" and "done with you Accelerate internal experimentation capability" mashed together without clear visual separation made me have…” Show full quote
    “the run-on formatting of "done for you High-ROI conversion rate optimization" and "done with you Accelerate internal experimentation capability" mashed together without clear visual separation made me have to re-read to figure out those were two distinct service tiers”
    Director of Product, SaaS · 501-1000 employeessimulated

Relevance

  • The page never names who it is for at what size

    6 of 15

    “"inconsistent or unreliable A/B test results" isn't addressed head-on anywhere; I'd need a case study or methodology detail”
    Senior Marketing Manager, B2B Software · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    See all 6 comments
    “the problem (low conversion, no experimentation muscle) and the two service modes are stated, not inferred. The intended reader isn't named explicitly by title or company size, but…” Show full quote
    “the problem (low conversion, no experimentation muscle) and the two service modes are stated, not inferred. The intended reader isn't named explicitly by title or company size, but it's obviously a marketing/growth leader”
    Senior Marketing Manager, B2B Software · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    “"done for you High-ROI conversion rate optimization" for those who want it fully outsourced, and "done with you Accelerate internal experimentation capability" for teams building their own program…” Show full quote
    “"done for you High-ROI conversion rate optimization" for those who want it fully outsourced, and "done with you Accelerate internal experimentation capability" for teams building their own program in-house. That's not buried, it's right up top in two clear tracks.”
    Head of Growth, B2B Software · 201-500 employeessimulated
    “I'd need a named buyer persona with my actual scale problem — something like "for SaaS companies doing €5-50M ARR who've plateaued on conversion rate" — plus a…” Show full quote
    “I'd need a named buyer persona with my actual scale problem — something like "for SaaS companies doing €5-50M ARR who've plateaued on conversion rate" — plus a number showing they've worked at that scale”
    Director of Product, SaaS · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    “So problem (losing conversions/revenue you're leaving on the table) and buyer segment (companies with or without an internal CRO team) are both stated, not inferred. What's missing is…” Show full quote
    “So problem (losing conversions/revenue you're leaving on the table) and buyer segment (companies with or without an internal CRO team) are both stated, not inferred. What's missing is which size/type of company this is calibrated for — a 1001-5000 person org doesn't know if I'm the target”
    Head of Growth, B2B Software · 1001-5000 employeessimulated
    “the phrasing "your team" and "internal experimentation program" makes it obvious this is aimed at a business with an existing marketing/product function, not a solo founder”
    Director of Marketing, SaaS · 1001-5000 employeessimulated

Brand alignment

  • Boutique and founder-led signals read as disqualifying for enterprise buyers

    5 of 15

    “"boutique" and "founders-led" signals small/scrappy, which makes me wonder if they can handle our volume of tests and stakeholders”
    VP of Marketing, E-commerce · 5000+ employeessimulated
    See all 6 comments
    “I don't see any signal they've handled a 500+ employee org before, so I'd want to ask directly whether their playbook scales to a company our size or…” Show full quote
    “I don't see any signal they've handled a 500+ employee org before, so I'd want to ask directly whether their playbook scales to a company our size or if it's built around leaner teams”
    VP of Marketing, E-commerce · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    “Tone-wise it's fine for someone like me — direct, no jargon-soup, "no slide deck theater" and "no 90-day discovery period" are the kind of operator-to-operator lines that land…” Show full quote
    “Tone-wise it's fine for someone like me — direct, no jargon-soup, "no slide deck theater" and "no 90-day discovery period" are the kind of operator-to-operator lines that land — but it still reads generic rather than written for an e-commerce VP of Product specifically”
    VP of Product, E-commerce · 201-500 employeessimulated
    “I'd need a line that names the buyer and their scale directly — something like 'for enterprise marketing teams running dozens of experiments across multiple markets' or a…” Show full quote
    “I'd need a line that names the buyer and their scale directly — something like 'for enterprise marketing teams running dozens of experiments across multiple markets' or a stat on traffic/revenue size they typically work with”
    Senior Marketing Manager, B2B Software · 5000+ employeessimulated
    “the blog/podcast content skews more practitioner-hobbyist (Claude.ai tutorials, cohort analysis guides) than enterprise-buyer, so it feels more aimed at a director of growth at a mid-size company than…” Show full quote
    “the blog/podcast content skews more practitioner-hobbyist (Claude.ai tutorials, cohort analysis guides) than enterprise-buyer, so it feels more aimed at a director of growth at a mid-size company than at someone signing off a large budget”
    VP of Marketing, E-commerce · 5000+ employeessimulated
    “Small — a handful of people, founder-led, probably under 10 years old, riding on the two founders' personal reputations rather than a built brand”
    VP of Marketing, E-commerce · 5000+ employeessimulated

  • The casual practitioner tone will not survive a CFO conversation

    3 of 15

    “The tone is casual and a bit cute ("Koalas in the Wild," "a safe place where we talk about interesting things") which reads more like they're writing for…” Show full quote
    “The tone is casual and a bit cute ("Koalas in the Wild," "a safe place where we talk about interesting things") which reads more like they're writing for peers in the CRO/analytics world than for a director trying to justify ad spend to a CFO.”
    Director of Marketing, SaaS · 1001-5000 employeessimulated
    See all 2 comments
    “the blog/podcast content skews more practitioner-hobbyist (Claude.ai tutorials, cohort analysis guides) than enterprise-buyer, so it feels more aimed at a director of growth at a mid-size company than…” Show full quote
    “the blog/podcast content skews more practitioner-hobbyist (Claude.ai tutorials, cohort analysis guides) than enterprise-buyer, so it feels more aimed at a director of growth at a mid-size company than at someone signing off a large budget”
    VP of Marketing, E-commerce · 5000+ employeessimulated
05

How this works

Who we simulated (15 personas)

15 AI-simulated personas matched to your target market. Each answered independently, without seeing your goal, the scoring criteria, or each other’s answers. Attribution is role, industry and company size only.

Senior Marketing ManagerB2B Software · 501-1000 employeesEU
Director of MarketingSaaS · 1001-5000 employeesUS
VP of MarketingE-commerce · 5000+ employeesEU
Head of GrowthB2B Software · 201-500 employeesUS
Director of ProductSaaS · 501-1000 employeesEU
VP of ProductE-commerce · 1001-5000 employeesUS
Senior Marketing ManagerB2B Software · 5000+ employeesEU
Director of MarketingSaaS · 201-500 employeesUS
VP of MarketingE-commerce · 501-1000 employeesEU
Head of GrowthB2B Software · 1001-5000 employeesUS
Director of ProductSaaS · 5000+ employeesEU
VP of ProductE-commerce · 201-500 employeesUS
Senior Marketing ManagerB2B Software · 501-1000 employeesEU
Director of MarketingSaaS · 1001-5000 employeesUS
VP of MarketingE-commerce · 5000+ employeesEU
Methodology

Every answer on this page was written by an AI model role-playing a buyer profile, scored on Wynter’s B2B Message Layers framework. The personas were sampled in code across role, industry, company size and behavioral traits; the model wrote only the answers. Scores arrive through fixed verdict categories and the counts are computed in our own code, so no number here was written by a model.

Score details: the count and the strength

The count is how many personas cleared the bar on each question. A yes can be unhesitating or come with reservations; the scorecard counts both as a yes, and this is the only place the difference is shown. Per layer:

  • Clarity: 15 of 15, 6 without hesitation, 9 with reservations
  • Relevance: 15 of 15, all with reservations
  • Value: 7 of 15, all with reservations
  • Differentiation: 2 of 15, all with reservations

These answers are AI-simulated and directional. Validate anything you’re betting on with real buyers, your ICPs.

Your next 3 moves

  1. 1.Rewrite the six subheads to carry the claim alone.
  2. 2.Add a named client result beside the revenue-gains claim.
  3. 3.Separate the two service tiers visually and label them.

See what real buyers say.

A detailed, section-by-section message test report from verified B2B professionals who are actually in-market for what you sell.

Test with humans
Trusted by
HubSpotRingCentralShopifyCognismPaddleVeeamRipplingMiro
RetentionThis report is kept for 60 days, until 24 Oct 2026, then deleted along with the personas, their answers and everything derived from them. The link stays live for that whole period so it can be shared or revisited, and stops working afterwards.

The email address it was requested from is kept beyond that, because it subscribes you to the newsletter — that was the price of the report. You can unsubscribe in one click from any issue, which stops the email without affecting a report still inside its 60 days. The public report page never shows the requester’s address.