Clarity
Do they understand what you do?
Strong15 of 15
15 could name what kind of product this is, unprompted.
Saved report, kept for 60 days — expires in 47 days. Re-opening it is free.
01
Your verdict
Relevance
Can they tell what it solves, and who it's for?
Strong15 of 1515 could quickly tell what problem it solves and who it is for.
Value
Do they actually want it?
Strong12 of 1512 would take a meeting to learn more.
Differentiation
Fix firstIs there a reason to pick you over the alternatives?
Fail0 of 150 could name a reason to pick you over a similar option.
See what they thought you were
Your page describes: data agency. They said:
- 4×Data/analytics implementation agencymatches
- 3×Data/analytics consulting agencymatches
- 2×Data/analytics tracking agencymatches
- 1×Data integration / analytics consultancymatches
- 1×Data/analytics tracking consultancymatches
- 1×Data/marketing analytics consulting agencymatches
3 couldn't name one; 12 got it right.
Four separate measures, not stages: all 15 personas answered all four questions. Each square is one persona.
Additional signalBrand alignment4 of 15FailShow finding ▸
Four respondents said the page's own artifacts undercut credibility: an empty Wall of Love and blank template feel like a placeholder site, and one said the early-stage template feel undercuts otherwise strong headline copy. One added the broad revenue range reads as an unfocused ICP rather than a proven niche. Not one of the four layers, and it does not affect the scores above or the order to fix them in.
These are 15 simulated buyers. Want 15 real ones?
Test with humans02
Fix these firstFix these first
Three edits, in the order that matters.
The first is on your weakest layer, the second on the next, the third on the layer the most buyers had a problem with. Each says what to change on the page and why, with one simulated answer behind it.
Fill every cell in the comparison table with concrete text.
Why: The table under 'How VisionLabs is different' is mostly empty — the Vision Lab column has no entries at all, and rows like 'AI Workflows with human expertise' and 'Built into Your Systems' are blank across the board. Readers treated the blanks as a placeholder rather than an argument, and a competitor showing named metrics beats it easily. Write a short, specific phrase in every cell: for the 'Time to value' row, say what Vision Labs delivers and when (e.g. 'Clean event tracking live in 30…
7 of 15 raised this
“the comparison table is the closest thing to a differentiator but it's just checkmarks against categories like "AI Workflows with human expertise" and "Time to value" with no…” Show full quote
“the comparison table is the closest thing to a differentiator but it's just checkmarks against categories like "AI Workflows with human expertise" and "Time to value" with no numbers or examples backing them up”
CMO, Software · 11-50 employeessimulated Moves DifferentiationSpecifics beat superlativesReplace 'Get Real Business Results' with a measured outcome.
Why: 'Our Solution / Get Real Business Results From Your Analytics Data' is a claim with nothing behind it, and it sits where readers were looking for evidence. Rewrite the heading as a specific result you have delivered and can attribute — e.g. 'Cut reporting discrepancies from 30% to under 2% in one quarter' — with the client or industry named directly beneath it.
8 of 15 raised this
“the "Wall of Love" has no actual names or logos, and the comparison table is just checkmarks with no substance”
Director of Performance Marketing, Technology Services · 11-50 employeessimulated Moves ValueSpecifics beat superlativesState plainly what Vision Labs is and how it engages.
Why: Readers had to work out whether this is a services agency, a SaaS product, or a hybrid, and the positioning-by-negation plus the blank table made it worse. Add one sentence under the headline that settles it: that a Vision Labs team does the implementation work inside your existing stack on a defined engagement, and that there is no software to buy.
3 of 15 raised this
“They're a consultancy that fixes broken tracking and stitches together your CDP, analytics, and ad platforms — basically an outsourced data/analytics implementation shop, not a software tool.”
VP of Marketing, Software · 51-200 employeessimulated Moves ClarityShow the product early
Keep these · 1
These landed. Keep the wording when you edit around it.
- Keep · Relevance
The problem statement and audience land immediately in the headline and subheading
“"fix your broken tracking so every decision runs on data you trust" tells me exactly the pain point, and the next line spells out the buyer range ("$1M…” Show full quote
“"fix your broken tracking so every decision runs on data you trust" tells me exactly the pain point, and the next line spells out the buyer range ("$1M to $1B in revenue") and the internal audience ("Product, Marketing, and AI")”
Director of Performance Marketing, Technology Services · 11-50 employeessimulated
03
All recommendations
Differentiation
Fail0 of 15Moves DifferentiationConcrete over abstract
Replace abstract row labels with the buyer's own outcomes.
Why: Row labels like 'AI Workflows with human expertise', 'Tooling Expertise' and 'Strategy, Execution, Systems' are category words that any data vendor could print. Rewrite them as jobs the buyer would say out loud: 'Fixes your existing GA4/Segment setup, not a new tool to learn', 'Owns the implementation inside your stack', 'Hands you KPIs and the decision to make'. The labels are what a scanning buyer reads first, so they must carry the difference on their own.
7 of 15 raised this
“the comparison table is the closest thing to a differentiator but it's just checkmarks against categories like "AI Workflows with human expertise" and "Time to value" with no…” Show full quote
“the comparison table is the closest thing to a differentiator but it's just checkmarks against categories like "AI Workflows with human expertise" and "Time to value" with no numbers or examples backing them up”
Moves DifferentiationGive a reason to choose you
Replace 'Not another software. Not another agency.' with what you do.
Why: Defining the offer by negation is what left readers unable to say what sets Vision Labs apart — and it pushed some to guess the company is a hybrid vendor. State the positive claim directly under 'How VisionLabs is different': name the tools you work in (CDP, GA4, warehouse, ad platforms), who does the work, and the point at which the client owns it. A named tool stack is the differentiator readers said was missing.
7 of 15 raised this
“the comparison table is the closest thing to a differentiator but it's just checkmarks against categories like "AI Workflows with human expertise" and "Time to value" with no…” Show full quote
“the comparison table is the closest thing to a differentiator but it's just checkmarks against categories like "AI Workflows with human expertise" and "Time to value" with no numbers or examples backing them up”
Value
Strong12 of 15Moves ValueAnswer the live objection
Add a timeline and pricing model near the CTA.
Why: Readers said they cannot commit budget without numbers. Before 'Book a quick intro call', state the engagement shape in plain terms — typical project length, whether it is fixed-fee or retainer, and a starting price band. Even 'Most tracking rebuilds run 6-10 weeks, fixed fee from $X' turns an unpriced call request into an informed one.
8 of 15 raised this
“the "Wall of Love" has no actual names or logos, and the comparison table is just checkmarks with no substance”
Clarity
Strong15 of 15Relevance
Strong15 of 15No specific edits needed here — this layer held up.
Brand alignment
Fail4 of 15Moves Brand alignmentProof next to the claim
Replace the empty 'Wall of Love' with one named client story.
Why: 'Wall of Love / Trusted by founders and marketing leaders' with nothing under it reads as a template site and undercuts otherwise strong headline copy. Either publish one named customer with a before/after tracking figure and the person's role and company beside it, or remove the module entirely until you have it. An empty proof block does more damage than no proof block.
4 of 15 raised this
“the empty comparison table and the "Wall of Love" with no actual quotes make it feel like an early-stage template that hasn't caught up to the ambition of…” Show full quote
“the empty comparison table and the "Wall of Love" with no actual quotes make it feel like an early-stage template that hasn't caught up to the ambition of the copy, which undercuts the confidence the headline is trying to project.”
Moves Brand alignmentName the audience
Narrow '$1M to $1B in revenue' to a specific buyer profile.
Why: A range that spans a seed startup and an enterprise reads as an unfocused ICP rather than a proven niche, and it is the only audience signal on the page. Replace it in the subheading with a stated profile — company stage, team shape, and the title you sell to, e.g. 'B2B SaaS companies from Series B to IPO, working with the VP of Marketing or Head of Data who owns the tracking stack'.
4 of 15 raised this
“the empty comparison table and the "Wall of Love" with no actual quotes make it feel like an early-stage template that hasn't caught up to the ambition of…” Show full quote
“the empty comparison table and the "Wall of Love" with no actual quotes make it feel like an early-stage template that hasn't caught up to the ambition of the copy, which undercuts the confidence the headline is trying to project.”
Moves Brand alignmentAnswer the live objection
Address the senior buyer's objections in a dedicated section.
Why: The voice assumes familiarity and speaks past a director-level buyer who is being asked to sign a budget. Add a short block that names what they are already thinking: how long before we see clean data, who on my team has to be involved, what happens when the engagement ends. Answer each in a sentence. Right now 'Book a quick intro call' is the only path to those answers.
4 of 15 raised this
“the empty comparison table and the "Wall of Love" with no actual quotes make it feel like an early-stage template that hasn't caught up to the ambition of…” Show full quote
“the empty comparison table and the "Wall of Love" with no actual quotes make it feel like an early-stage template that hasn't caught up to the ambition of the copy, which undercuts the confidence the headline is trying to project.”
04
Buyer evidence
Biggest risks
A deliberately adversarial read of the same answers. Each claim was checked back against what the personas said and dropped if nothing supported it.
- high
The page asks for a purchase decision while withholding every input a purchase decision requires.
Nine respondents found no case studies, client names, or numbers; several named exactly what was missing — one client with before/after tracking metrics, timelines, pricing. One stated outright that the absence of metrics, timelines, and pricing makes a budget commitment impossible. That is not a gap in polish, it is a page that cannot be acted on.
- high
The comparison table actively damages the page rather than merely underperforming.
Seven respondents attacked it for empty cells, vague labels, and no substance, and two said a competitor with named metrics beats it. One respondent tied the table directly to confusion about what the company even is. A blank differentiation asset hands the comparison to whoever fills theirs in.
- high
Strong top-of-page copy is wasted because nothing below it holds up.
Four respondents said the problem and audience land immediately in the headline and subheading without hunting. Yet one explicitly said the early-stage template feel undercuts otherwise strong headline copy, and four total cited the empty Wall of Love and blank table as placeholder-site signals. The page earns attention in the first screen and forfeits it in the next.
- high
The page is read as an unfinished draft, not a live offering.
Four respondents described an empty Wall of Love and blank template as a placeholder site, and one flagged a broad revenue range as an unfocused ICP rather than a proven niche. Shipping empty proof modules signals there is no proof to put in them.
- high
Zero respondents can repeat back a reason to choose this vendor, which means the page has no message to carry into an internal conversation.
Across the differentiation points, no respondent articulated a differentiator in their own words. One attributed this to missing named clients, metrics, and tool stack; another to the Wall of Love and empty table. Nothing survives the page for a buyer to relay to a colleague.
- medium
Readers cannot tell what they would be buying, so the missing proof cannot be evaluated even in principle.
Three respondents had to work out what the company is, landing on a services agency or hybrid vendor rather than self-serve software, with positioning by negation and the comparison table cited as the cause. Category ambiguity compounds with the absent pricing and timelines noted by nine respondents: neither the thing nor its cost is stated.
Differentiation
The comparison table is blank and abstract, so it differentiates nothing
7 of 15
“the comparison table is the closest thing to a differentiator but it's just checkmarks against categories like "AI Workflows with human expertise" and "Time to value" with no…” Show full quote
“the comparison table is the closest thing to a differentiator but it's just checkmarks against categories like "AI Workflows with human expertise" and "Time to value" with no numbers or examples backing them up”
CMO, Software · 11-50 employeessimulated See all 7 comments
“But the table cells are basically blank checkmarks with no numbers behind them — "Time to value" for them just says nothing, while "SAAS Tool" gets "Setup time…” Show full quote
“But the table cells are basically blank checkmarks with no numbers behind them — "Time to value" for them just says nothing, while "SAAS Tool" gets "Setup time varies"”
Senior Marketing Manager, SaaS · 51-200 employeessimulated “phrases like "AI Workflows with human expertise" and "Built into Your Systems" are abstract nouns strung together with no verb telling me what actually happens; I can't picture…” Show full quote
“phrases like "AI Workflows with human expertise" and "Built into Your Systems" are abstract nouns strung together with no verb telling me what actually happens; I can't picture a step from reading them”
Chief Marketing Officer, SaaS · 11-50 employeessimulated “That comparison table with "SaaS Tool / Full-Time Hire / Agency / Advisor" columns was actually useful for placing them, even if the cells were mostly blank.”
VP of Marketing, SaaS · 11-50 employeessimulated “the "Wall of Love" section is just a label with no logos, names, or quotes attached that I can see, and the comparison table is mostly empty cells,…” Show full quote
“the "Wall of Love" section is just a label with no logos, names, or quotes attached that I can see, and the comparison table is mostly empty cells, which reads more like a template they haven't filled in than proof.”
VP of Marketing, SaaS · 11-50 employeessimulated “the cells are mostly blank checkmarks or vague phrases like "Not always" and "Limited" with no substance behind them, so it reads as marketing theater rather than proof”
Chief Marketing Officer, Technology Services · 51-200 employeessimulated “those are labels, not descriptions, so I can't tell if this is heavy consulting hours, a proprietary tool, or a template they reuse for every client”
CMO, SaaS · 51-200 employeessimulated Respondents could not state a differentiator in their own words
3 of 15
“A competitor with even one named client logo tied to a specific before/after metric, or a stated tool stack (which CDP, which analytics platform, which ad platforms they've…” Show full quote
“A competitor with even one named client logo tied to a specific before/after metric, or a stated tool stack (which CDP, which analytics platform, which ad platforms they've actually wired up), would win instantly because that's concrete and checkable, and this page gives me neither.”
Chief Marketing Officer, SaaS · 11-50 employeessimulated See all 3 comments
“the "Wall of Love" section is just a label with no logos, names, or quotes attached that I can see, and the comparison table is mostly empty cells,…” Show full quote
“the "Wall of Love" section is just a label with no logos, names, or quotes attached that I can see, and the comparison table is mostly empty cells, which reads more like a template they haven't filled in than proof.”
VP of Marketing, SaaS · 11-50 employeessimulated “If a competitor's page had one named client at our revenue size with a before/after number on tracking accuracy or wasted ad spend, that alone would beat this…” Show full quote
“If a competitor's page had one named client at our revenue size with a before/after number on tracking accuracy or wasted ad spend, that alone would beat this page”
Director of Performance Marketing, Technology Services · 11-50 employeessimulated
Value
No named customer, logo, or metric appears anywhere on the page
8 of 15
“the "Wall of Love" has no actual names or logos, and the comparison table is just checkmarks with no substance”
Director of Performance Marketing, Technology Services · 11-50 employeessimulated See all 8 comments
“The page never gives me a reason this is more urgent today than any other day — no "here's what broken tracking is costing you" number, no case…” Show full quote
“The page never gives me a reason this is more urgent today than any other day — no "here's what broken tracking is costing you" number, no case study result on this page itself (just a "Case Study →" link I'd have to click).”
VP of Marketing, Software · 51-200 employeessimulated “the page gives me zero mechanism for how they get there - no before/after example, no "we found X% of events were misfiring" case study”
CMO, Software · 11-50 employeessimulated “But there's zero proof here — no case study numbers, no client names, no before/after metrics”
Senior Marketing Manager, SaaS · 51-200 employeessimulated “the comparison table (AI Workflows, Built into Your Systems, Tooling Expertise) is all positioning with empty checkmarks, no case study numbers, no named tool stack, no sense of…” Show full quote
“the comparison table (AI Workflows, Built into Your Systems, Tooling Expertise) is all positioning with empty checkmarks, no case study numbers, no named tool stack, no sense of implementation time”
Chief Marketing Officer, SaaS · 11-50 employeessimulated “I'd want a named case study with a company my size showing before/after — like "we cut discrepancy between GA4 and our CDP from X% to Y%"”
VP of Marketing, SaaS · 11-50 employeessimulated “the page gives me nothing concrete: no before/after metrics, no example of what "broken tracking" actually costs someone my size, no timeline or price signal”
Chief Marketing Officer, Technology Services · 51-200 employeessimulated “If a competitor's page had one named client at our revenue size with a before/after number on tracking accuracy or wasted ad spend, that alone would beat this…” Show full quote
“If a competitor's page had one named client at our revenue size with a before/after number on tracking accuracy or wasted ad spend, that alone would beat this page”
Director of Performance Marketing, Technology Services · 11-50 employeessimulated
Clarity
The service category is never named, leaving readers to infer it
3 of 15
“They're a consultancy that fixes broken tracking and stitches together your CDP, analytics, and ad platforms — basically an outsourced data/analytics implementation shop, not a software tool.”
VP of Marketing, Software · 51-200 employeessimulated See all 4 comments
“Not a SaaS tool, they were explicit about that ("Not another software"), it's consultants doing implementation work with some ongoing advisory layer”
CMO, Software · 11-50 employeessimulated “The phrase "Not another software. Not another traditional agency" is what muddied it — that's negative positioning that tells me what they're not, not what they are”
Chief Marketing Officer, Technology Services · 51-200 employeessimulated “no specifics on what "broken" means (missing events? attribution gaps? duplicate data?) so I can't tell if this maps to my actual pain without a call”
CMO, Software · 11-50 employeessimulated
Relevance
The problem statement and audience land immediately in the headline and subheading
4 of 15 · what worked
“"fix your broken tracking so every decision runs on data you trust" tells me exactly the pain point, and the next line spells out the buyer range ("$1M…” Show full quote
“"fix your broken tracking so every decision runs on data you trust" tells me exactly the pain point, and the next line spells out the buyer range ("$1M to $1B in revenue") and the internal audience ("Product, Marketing, and AI")”
Director of Performance Marketing, Technology Services · 11-50 employeessimulated See all 4 comments
“The tone is aimed at someone like me — it skips the fluffy "we're passionate about data" stuff and goes straight to the operational pain”
Senior Marketing Manager, Software · 51-200 employeessimulated “the subhead literally says "helps you fix your broken tracking so every decision runs on data you trust," and the next line spells out the range ("$1M to…” Show full quote
“the subhead literally says "helps you fix your broken tracking so every decision runs on data you trust," and the next line spells out the range ("$1M to $1B in revenue") and the mechanics ("standardize events, integrate CDP, analytics, and ad platforms")”
CMO, SaaS · 51-200 employeessimulated “the headline "fix your broken tracking so every decision runs on data you trust" plus the line about companies "from $1M to $1B in revenue" who need CDP/analytics/ad…” Show full quote
“the headline "fix your broken tracking so every decision runs on data you trust" plus the line about companies "from $1M to $1B in revenue" who need CDP/analytics/ad platforms stitched together tells me this is for mid-to-larger growth companies with messy data stacks”
Chief Marketing Officer, Software · 11-50 employeessimulated The ICP is implied by a revenue range rather than stated
4 of 15
“Reader is implied more than named — no explicit "for VPs of Marketing" line, but the mention of "decisions used by Product, Marketing, and AI" and the comparison…” Show full quote
“Reader is implied more than named — no explicit "for VPs of Marketing" line, but the mention of "decisions used by Product, Marketing, and AI" and the comparison table against SAAS Tool/Full-Time Hire/Agency tells me they're aiming at whoever owns that martech/data stack decision”
VP of Marketing, Software · 51-200 employeessimulated See all 4 comments
“the problem statement was immediate and unambiguous, but the ICP is implied rather than named outright — I'd want a firmer qualifier like "for Series B+ SaaS companies…” Show full quote
“the problem statement was immediate and unambiguous, but the ICP is implied rather than named outright — I'd want a firmer qualifier like "for Series B+ SaaS companies with in-house marketing analytics teams"”
Chief Marketing Officer, SaaS · 11-50 employeessimulated “The "who" is a bit more inferred than stated: they mention "companies from $1M to $1B in revenue" and say they serve Product, Marketing, and AI teams, which…” Show full quote
“The "who" is a bit more inferred than stated: they mention "companies from $1M to $1B in revenue" and say they serve Product, Marketing, and AI teams, which reads to me as VP/CMO-level buyers at growth-stage companies, but there's no explicit "this is for you if..." line calling out a title or seniority.”
Chief Marketing Officer, Technology Services · 51-200 employeessimulated “What's less obvious is who exactly on my team owns this relationship day-to-day — is it me, a data/analytics lead, or ops? They don't spell that out, they…” Show full quote
“What's less obvious is who exactly on my team owns this relationship day-to-day — is it me, a data/analytics lead, or ops? They don't spell that out, they just say "high-growth teams."”
VP of Marketing, SaaS · 11-50 employeessimulated
Brand alignment
Empty proof modules make the company read as early-stage
4 of 15
“the empty comparison table and the "Wall of Love" with no actual quotes make it feel like an early-stage template that hasn't caught up to the ambition of…” Show full quote
“the empty comparison table and the "Wall of Love" with no actual quotes make it feel like an early-stage template that hasn't caught up to the ambition of the copy, which undercuts the confidence the headline is trying to project.”
Senior Marketing Manager, Technology Services · 11-50 employeessimulated See all 4 comments
“the empty "Wall of Love" section (no actual logos shown) both suggest they're still building out proof rather than an established agency with a long client roster”
Senior Marketing Manager, Software · 51-200 employeessimulated “The line "companies from $1M to $1B in revenue" is such a wide net that it feels like they're still figuring out their exact ICP rather than having…” Show full quote
“The line "companies from $1M to $1B in revenue" is such a wide net that it feels like they're still figuring out their exact ICP rather than having a proven niche”
Director of Performance Marketing, Software · 51-200 employeessimulated “it doesn't feel written for a skeptical buyer specifically; there's no anticipation of the objections I'd actually raise, like cost, timeline, or what happens to my existing analytics…” Show full quote
“it doesn't feel written for a skeptical buyer specifically; there's no anticipation of the objections I'd actually raise, like cost, timeline, or what happens to my existing analytics team”
VP of Marketing, Technology Services · 51-200 employeessimulated The tone speaks past the senior buyer it needs to convince
2 of 15
“generic startup-marketing tone, not written specifically for a Director of Performance Marketing at a 51-200 person software company — no mention of martech stack specifics, no B2B SaaS…” Show full quote
“generic startup-marketing tone, not written specifically for a Director of Performance Marketing at a 51-200 person software company — no mention of martech stack specifics, no B2B SaaS jargon like MQL/pipeline attribution”
Director of Performance Marketing, Software · 51-200 employeessimulated See all 2 comments
“it doesn't feel written for a skeptical buyer specifically; there's no anticipation of the objections I'd actually raise, like cost, timeline, or what happens to my existing analytics…” Show full quote
“it doesn't feel written for a skeptical buyer specifically; there's no anticipation of the objections I'd actually raise, like cost, timeline, or what happens to my existing analytics team”
VP of Marketing, Technology Services · 51-200 employeessimulated
05
How this works
Who we simulated (15 personas)
15 AI-simulated personas matched to your target market. Each answered independently, without seeing your goal, the scoring criteria, or each other’s answers. Attribution is role, industry and company size only.
Chief Marketing OfficerSaaS · 11-50 employeesEU
VP of MarketingSoftware · 51-200 employeesUS
Director of Performance MarketingTechnology Services · 11-50 employeesEU
Senior Marketing ManagerSaaS · 51-200 employeesUS
CMOSoftware · 11-50 employeesEU
Chief Marketing OfficerTechnology Services · 51-200 employeesUS
VP of MarketingSaaS · 11-50 employeesEU
Director of Performance MarketingSoftware · 51-200 employeesUS
Senior Marketing ManagerTechnology Services · 11-50 employeesEU
CMOSaaS · 51-200 employeesUS
Chief Marketing OfficerSoftware · 11-50 employeesEU
VP of MarketingTechnology Services · 51-200 employeesUS
Director of Performance MarketingSaaS · 11-50 employeesEU
Senior Marketing ManagerSoftware · 51-200 employeesUS
CMOTechnology Services · 11-50 employeesEU
Methodology
Every answer on this page was written by an AI model role-playing a buyer profile, scored on Wynter’s B2B Message Layers framework. The personas were sampled in code across role, industry, company size and behavioral traits; the model wrote only the answers. Scores arrive through fixed verdict categories and the counts are computed in our own code, so no number here was written by a model.
Score details: the count and the strength
The count is how many personas cleared the bar on each question. A yes can be unhesitating or come with reservations; the scorecard counts both as a yes, and this is the only place the difference is shown. Per layer:
- Clarity: 15 of 15, all with reservations
- Relevance: 15 of 15, 2 without hesitation, 13 with reservations
- Value: 12 of 15, all with reservations
- Differentiation: 0 of 15
These answers are AI-simulated and directional. Validate anything you’re betting on with real buyers, your ICPs.
Your next 3 moves
- 1.Fill every cell in the comparison table with concrete text.
- 2.Replace 'Get Real Business Results' with a measured outcome.
- 3.State plainly what Vision Labs is and how it engages.
See what real buyers say.
A detailed, section-by-section message test report from verified B2B professionals who are actually in-market for what you sell.
Trusted by
RetentionThis report is kept for 60 days, until 23 Oct 2026, then deleted along with the personas, their answers and everything derived from them. The link stays live for that whole period so it can be shared or revisited, and stops working afterwards.
The email address it was requested from is kept beyond that, because it subscribes you to the newsletter — that was the price of the report. You can unsubscribe in one click from any issue, which stops the email without affecting a report still inside its 60 days. The public report page never shows the requester’s address.
The email address it was requested from is kept beyond that, because it subscribes you to the newsletter — that was the price of the report. You can unsubscribe in one click from any issue, which stops the email without affecting a report still inside its 60 days. The public report page never shows the requester’s address.