Message test · Megaport

Only 1 of 15 buyers could tell what Megaport is.

https://www.megaport.com/15 AI-simulated buyers

Your message needs work: they know why it's worth their time, but not what it is, who it's for, or why to pick you.

Simulated responsesNo humans answered these questions. Every quote below was written by an AI model role-playing a buyer profile.
Share score cardDownload as markdown
Saved report, kept for 60 days — expires in 60 days. Re-opening it is free.
01

Your verdict

  • Clarity

    Fix first

    Do they understand what you do?

    Fail1 of 15

    1 could name what kind of product this is, unprompted.

  • Relevance

    Can they tell what it solves, and who it's for?

    Weak8 of 15

    8 could quickly tell what problem it solves and who it is for.

  • Value

    Do they actually want it?

    Strong14 of 14

    14 would take a meeting to learn more.

  • Differentiation

    Is there a reason to pick you over the alternatives?

    Weak8 of 15

    8 could name a reason to pick you over a similar option.

See what they thought you were

Your page describes: infrastructure provisioning platform. They said:

  • 4×Network-as-a-service / interconnection platformwrong

11 couldn't name one; 4 named the wrong one.

Four separate measures, not stages: all 15 personas answered all four questions. Each square is one persona.

Additional signalBrand alignment15 of 15StrongShow finding ▸

Five respondents flagged phrases like "Mission control" and space-opera framing as generic exec marketing, inconsistent with the technical case-study language elsewhere on the page. Not one of the four layers, and it does not affect the scores above or the order to fix them in.

These are 15 simulated buyers. Want 15 real ones?

Test with humans
02

Fix these first

Fix these first

Three edits, in the order that matters.

The first is on your weakest layer, the second on the next, the third on the layer the most buyers had a problem with. Each says what to change on the page and why, with one simulated answer behind it.

  1. Rewrite the H1 to name what Megaport is: private network connectivity between clouds and data centers.

    Why: "Compute. Network. Storage." and "Launch automated infrastructure on demand, globally" could belong to any cloud vendor. Say in the headline that Megaport provisions private connections between clouds, data centers and offices in minutes.

    5 of 15 raised this

    “Not fully sure where the compute/GPU piece fits versus being a reseller tie-in.”
    Network Infrastructure Director, Enterprise Software · 201-500 employeessimulated
    Moves Clarity
    Lead with the use case

  2. Replace "31+ Countries Connected" with a link to a region and location list.

    Why: A buyer in APAC or EMEA cannot tell whether their metro is covered. Link the stat to a searchable list of locations and on-ramps by region.

    3 of 15 raised this

    “I'd want a line near the top naming the role directly — something like "for network and infrastructure teams managing multi-cloud and data center connectivity" — plus a…” Show full quote
    “I'd want a line near the top naming the role directly — something like "for network and infrastructure teams managing multi-cloud and data center connectivity" — plus a concrete artifact like a topology diagram or a sample provisioning screen”
    VP of Infrastructure, IT Services · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    Moves Relevance
    Specifics beat superlatives

  3. Add a section comparing Megaport to carrier circuits and single-provider fabrics.

    Why: Standing next to Equinix Fabric or a telco circuit, the page offers no reason to pick Megaport. Name the alternatives and state the difference: provider count, contract term, time to provision.

    4 of 15 raised this

    “What would tip it for Megaport is a side-by-side showing named GCP interconnect regions/latency or pricing versus those two — right now the page just asserts scale without…” Show full quote
    “What would tip it for Megaport is a side-by-side showing named GCP interconnect regions/latency or pricing versus those two — right now the page just asserts scale without letting me compare”
    Cloud Infrastructure Manager, Enterprise Software · 5000+ employeessimulated
    Moves Differentiation
    Give a reason to choose you

Keep these · 2

These landed. Keep the wording when you edit around it.

  1. Keep · Clarity

    Customer quotes and the stats block, not the tagline, are what make the offering legible

    “the actual product category from the Solutions headers and case studies instead of the top copy”
    VP of Infrastructure, IT Services · 501-1000 employeessimulated
  2. Keep · Value

    The NXP deployment-time case study is the proof point that lands

    “provisioning time and vendor sprawl: instead of raising a ticket with Juniper-based carriers and waiting weeks for cross-connects or new circuits to a cloud or data center, I'd…” Show full quote
    “provisioning time and vendor sprawl: instead of raising a ticket with Juniper-based carriers and waiting weeks for cross-connects or new circuits to a cloud or data center, I'd be doing it through one console in days, across 410+ providers”
    VP of Infrastructure, IT Services · 501-1000 employeessimulated
03

All recommendations

Clarity

Fail1 of 15
Moves ClarityPlain language

Replace "Mission control for your entire stack" with the job the buyer does.

Why: Space metaphors like "Mission control" and "Ready for liftoff" tell a network engineer nothing about the product. Use the plain job instead: connect multiple clouds, sites and providers without ordering circuits.

5 of 15 raised this

“Not fully sure where the compute/GPU piece fits versus being a reseller tie-in.”
Network Infrastructure Director, Enterprise Software · 201-500 employeessimulated
Moves ClarityName the audience

Add a line under the H1 naming the buyer: network, infrastructure and cloud architecture teams.

Why: Nothing on the page says who it is for until the case-study job titles far below. State the roles and the situation, such as enterprises running workloads across several clouds and regions.

5 of 15 raised this

“Not fully sure where the compute/GPU piece fits versus being a reseller tie-in.”
Network Infrastructure Director, Enterprise Software · 201-500 employeessimulated
Moves ClarityShow the product early

Move a product screenshot or portal view above the stats block.

Why: A reader scrolls through three taglines and four stats before seeing anything concrete about the product. Show the portal where a connection is configured, with a one-line caption saying what is happening.

5 of 15 raised this

“Not fully sure where the compute/GPU piece fits versus being a reseller tie-in.”
Network Infrastructure Director, Enterprise Software · 201-500 employeessimulated

Relevance

Weak8 of 15
Moves RelevanceName the audience

Name the industries served in the "Why Megaport" intro, including telecom and carriers.

Why: The page never says which industries it serves, so carrier and telecom buyers have to guess from customer logos. List the named sectors and link each to the matching case study.

3 of 15 raised this

“I'd want a line near the top naming the role directly — something like "for network and infrastructure teams managing multi-cloud and data center connectivity" — plus a…” Show full quote
“I'd want a line near the top naming the role directly — something like "for network and infrastructure teams managing multi-cloud and data center connectivity" — plus a concrete artifact like a topology diagram or a sample provisioning screen”
VP of Infrastructure, IT Services · 501-1000 employeessimulated
Moves RelevanceSpecifics beat superlatives

Add provisioning time in minutes next to "Fast" and delete "at lightspeed".

Why: "Configure and connect ... at lightspeed" gives no number a buyer can plan against. State the typical time from order to live connection, and where that time applies.

3 of 15 raised this

“I'd want a line near the top naming the role directly — something like "for network and infrastructure teams managing multi-cloud and data center connectivity" — plus a…” Show full quote
“I'd want a line near the top naming the role directly — something like "for network and infrastructure teams managing multi-cloud and data center connectivity" — plus a concrete artifact like a topology diagram or a sample provisioning screen”
VP of Infrastructure, IT Services · 501-1000 employeessimulated

Differentiation

Weak8 of 15
Moves DifferentiationSpecifics beat superlatives

Name specific providers under "410+ leading cloud, network, and service providers".

Why: The count tells a buyer nothing about whether their clouds and SaaS platforms are reachable. List the major on-ramps by name and link to the full directory.

4 of 15 raised this

“What would tip it for Megaport is a side-by-side showing named GCP interconnect regions/latency or pricing versus those two — right now the page just asserts scale without…” Show full quote
“What would tip it for Megaport is a side-by-side showing named GCP interconnect regions/latency or pricing versus those two — right now the page just asserts scale without letting me compare”
Cloud Infrastructure Manager, Enterprise Software · 5000+ employeessimulated
Moves DifferentiationProof next to the claim

Date and source the stats block, naming the measurement period for 170+ Tbps.

Why: Numbers with no date or method read as marketing rather than evidence. Add an "as of" date and a footnote saying how capacity and locations are counted.

4 of 15 raised this

“What would tip it for Megaport is a side-by-side showing named GCP interconnect regions/latency or pricing versus those two — right now the page just asserts scale without…” Show full quote
“What would tip it for Megaport is a side-by-side showing named GCP interconnect regions/latency or pricing versus those two — right now the page just asserts scale without letting me compare”
Cloud Infrastructure Manager, Enterprise Software · 5000+ employeessimulated

Value

Strong14 of 14
Moves ValueFront-load the meaning

Add the before-and-after numbers to the NXP card heading, not only the quote.

Why: The strongest proof, six months down to a week, sits inside a quote a skimmer skips. Put the timeline compression in the heading so it reads without the body copy.

3 of 15 raised this

“A measured time-to-provision on our own pilot — say, a new GCP interconnect live in days instead of our current weeks-to-months carrier dance. That's the single number I'd…” Show full quote
“A measured time-to-provision on our own pilot — say, a new GCP interconnect live in days instead of our current weeks-to-months carrier dance. That's the single number I'd need to see reproduced”
Cloud Infrastructure Manager, Enterprise Software · 5000+ employeessimulated
04

Buyer evidence

Biggest risks

A deliberately adversarial read of the same answers. Each claim was checked back against what the personas said and dropped if nothing supported it.

  • high

    The hero is dead weight — the page only starts working after the reader scrolls past it.

    Nine respondents called the hero abstract fluff with no named product, buyer or pain, while six said case studies, the Solutions header and the stats block were what made the offering legible. The page's own hero is the weakest asset on it.

  • high

    The messaging depends entirely on readers doing the work the copy refused to do.

    Comprehension came from inferring the audience from case studies rather than any explicit statement, and value proposition surfaced only further down the page. Anyone who stops at the fold leaves with nothing.

  • high

    The page gives no basis for a purchase decision, only for a vague favourable impression.

    Five respondents could not rank the product without a side-by-side against Equinix Fabric or Console Connect, four wanted mechanism and failover detail, and all of those wanted a pilot before committing. Interest without ranking criteria is a stalled deal.

  • high

    The single proof point that works is carrying the entire evidentiary load, and it is not enough.

    Four respondents named the NXP provisioning-time story as the concrete ROI, but four others said one anecdote with no technical explanation or failover comparison does not constitute evidence. The same artifact is both the page's only win and its named…

  • medium

    The headline statistics actively undermine credibility rather than build it.

    Figures like Tbps capacity carry no date, methodology or baseline, leaving respondents unable to treat them as evidence, and three co-equal pillars imply a full stack the numbers only support on the network side. Unsubstantiated scale claims read as overreach.

  • medium

    The page speaks in two incompatible voices and neither audience is fully served.

    Five respondents flagged "Mission control" and space-opera framing as generic exec marketing inconsistent with the technical case-study language elsewhere, while others wanted topology diagrams and role-specific headings. The tonal split satisfies neither…

Clarity

  • Hero copy is generic and does not name the product, buyer, or pain point

    5 of 15

    “Not fully sure where the compute/GPU piece fits versus being a reseller tie-in.”
    Network Infrastructure Director, Enterprise Software · 201-500 employeessimulated
    See all 8 comments
    “The intended reader is never named outright — no "for network engineers" or "for infra teams" — I pieced it together from the solutions list and the logos/case…” Show full quote
    “The intended reader is never named outright — no "for network engineers" or "for infra teams" — I pieced it together from the solutions list and the logos/case studies”
    Cloud Infrastructure Manager, IT Services · 5000+ employeessimulated
    “the top half with "Mission control for your entire stack" and "Ready for liftoff" is marketing fluff aimed at a broader exec audience, not infra engineers”
    Cloud Infrastructure Manager, IT Services · 5000+ employeessimulated
    “It took a bit of piecing together, not instant. The hero copy — "Compute. Network. Storage. Launch automated infrastructure on demand, globally" — is vague marketing fluff on…” Show full quote
    “It took a bit of piecing together, not instant. The hero copy — "Compute. Network. Storage. Launch automated infrastructure on demand, globally" — is vague marketing fluff on its own; I didn't get the real problem until the Solutions section and the customer quotes further down”
    Head of IT Operations, Telecommunications · 1001-5000 employeessimulated
    “these are verbs and metaphors, not nouns I can act on. None of them tell me if I'm provisioning a cross-connect, a VXC, a virtual router, or a…” Show full quote
    “these are verbs and metaphors, not nouns I can act on. None of them tell me if I'm provisioning a cross-connect, a VXC, a virtual router, or a bare-metal box”
    VP of Infrastructure, IT Services · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    “The top of the page ("Compute. Network. Storage. Launch automated infrastructure on demand, globally") is generic infra-as-a-service fluff that could describe a dozen vendors, and I had to…” Show full quote
    “The top of the page ("Compute. Network. Storage. Launch automated infrastructure on demand, globally") is generic infra-as-a-service fluff that could describe a dozen vendors, and I had to scroll to the testimonials to actually get the problem”
    Cloud Infrastructure Manager, Cloud Services · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    “the hero copy ("Mission control for your entire stack," "Launch on demand, scale in minutes") is generic marketing-deck fluff that could be aimed at anyone, but the Solutions…” Show full quote
    “the hero copy ("Mission control for your entire stack," "Launch on demand, scale in minutes") is generic marketing-deck fluff that could be aimed at anyone, but the Solutions and quote sections shift into language I recognize — bandwidth, cross-connects, provisioning timelines — so it feels like it was written by marketing for a broad audience first, with the actual substance for someone like me buried further down”
    VP of Infrastructure, IT Services · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    “the actual problem being solved — slow manual circuit/carrier provisioning — I had to infer from the customer quotes, not the hero copy”
    Cloud Infrastructure Manager, IT Services · 5000+ employeessimulated

  • Customer quotes and the stats block, not the tagline, are what make the offering legible

    5 of 15 · what worked

    “the actual product category from the Solutions headers and case studies instead of the top copy”
    VP of Infrastructure, IT Services · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    See all 3 comments
    “The customer quotes anchor it for me: Framestore connecting to clouds quickly, NXP going from six months to a week — that's the real signal, not the "mission…” Show full quote
    “The customer quotes anchor it for me: Framestore connecting to clouds quickly, NXP going from six months to a week — that's the real signal, not the "mission control for your stack" tagline.”
    Head of IT Operations, Telecommunications · 1001-5000 employeessimulated
    “They're a network connectivity provider with compute and storage bolted on — basically SDN-driven interconnection, letting you provision private links between clouds, data centers, and offices on demand”
    Cloud Infrastructure Manager, Cloud Services · 501-1000 employeessimulated

Relevance

  • Industry and region specifics respondents needed were absent

    3 of 15

    “I'd want a line near the top naming the role directly — something like "for network and infrastructure teams managing multi-cloud and data center connectivity" — plus a…” Show full quote
    “I'd want a line near the top naming the role directly — something like "for network and infrastructure teams managing multi-cloud and data center connectivity" — plus a concrete artifact like a topology diagram or a sample provisioning screen”
    VP of Infrastructure, IT Services · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    See all 3 comments
    “I'd need my industry named outright — "telecom" or "carrier" — plus an APAC PoP list”
    VP of Infrastructure, Telecommunications · 5000+ employeessimulated
    “it's inferable within seconds from the customer logos and quotes — Framestore, Heidelberg Materials, Goodman Fielder, NXP — so I'd say this is infrastructure/network teams at mid-to-large enterprises…” Show full quote
    “it's inferable within seconds from the customer logos and quotes — Framestore, Heidelberg Materials, Goodman Fielder, NXP — so I'd say this is infrastructure/network teams at mid-to-large enterprises managing multi-cloud or multi-site connectivity, not SMBs. So yes, fast to get the problem and the audience, but only because I triangulated it from case study roles, not because the page stated "this is for network infrastructure directors" anywhere explicit.”
    Network Infrastructure Director, Cloud Services · 1001-5000 employeessimulated

Differentiation

  • No competitor comparison is offered, so respondents could not rank the product

    4 of 15

    “What would tip it for Megaport is a side-by-side showing named GCP interconnect regions/latency or pricing versus those two — right now the page just asserts scale without…” Show full quote
    “What would tip it for Megaport is a side-by-side showing named GCP interconnect regions/latency or pricing versus those two — right now the page just asserts scale without letting me compare”
    Cloud Infrastructure Manager, Enterprise Software · 5000+ employeessimulated
    See all 4 comments
    “I'd need Megaport's page to show provisioning architecture and named failover behavior side by side with provider counts — right now the stats are the only concrete thing”
    Senior Infrastructure Engineer, Cloud Services · 201-500 employeessimulated
    “to pick Megaport over them I'd need a named-provider list I can check against my own target regions, not just a round number, plus pricing that's clearly cheaper…” Show full quote
    “to pick Megaport over them I'd need a named-provider list I can check against my own target regions, not just a round number, plus pricing that's clearly cheaper or faster than those options”
    VP of Infrastructure, IT Services · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    “But it wouldn't let me pick this over a competitor outright: there's no telecom-sector customer and nothing about VMware interoperability, so I'd rule nothing in or out from…” Show full quote
    “But it wouldn't let me pick this over a competitor outright: there's no telecom-sector customer and nothing about VMware interoperability, so I'd rule nothing in or out from this page alone”
    Head of IT Operations, Telecommunications · 1001-5000 employeessimulated

  • The large headline stats lack dates, methodology, or baselines

    2 of 15

    “The words 'compute, network, and storage' sitting as three co-equal pillars is what muddied it — that phrasing implies a full infrastructure stack, but the stats block only…” Show full quote
    “The words 'compute, network, and storage' sitting as three co-equal pillars is what muddied it — that phrasing implies a full infrastructure stack, but the stats block only backs up the network side (Tbps, countries connected), so I had to infer storage and compute were secondary add-ons rather than core offerings the copy ever actually proved.”
    Infrastructure Leader, Data Centers · 5000+ employeessimulated
    See all 2 comments
    “"170+ Tbps Network Capacity," "31+ Countries Connected," "1,200+ Enabled Locations" — are just dropped in with no methodology, no date, no comparison baseline, so they don't help me…” Show full quote
    “"170+ Tbps Network Capacity," "31+ Countries Connected," "1,200+ Enabled Locations" — are just dropped in with no methodology, no date, no comparison baseline, so they don't help me differentiate against another shortlisted vendor; anyone can print a big Tbps number”
    VP of Infrastructure, IT Services · 501-1000 employeessimulated

Value

  • One anecdote is not enough evidence; respondents want mechanism, failover detail, and a…

    3 of 15

    “A measured time-to-provision on our own pilot — say, a new GCP interconnect live in days instead of our current weeks-to-months carrier dance. That's the single number I'd…” Show full quote
    “A measured time-to-provision on our own pilot — say, a new GCP interconnect live in days instead of our current weeks-to-months carrier dance. That's the single number I'd need to see reproduced”
    Cloud Infrastructure Manager, Enterprise Software · 5000+ employeessimulated
    See all 4 comments
    “A straight answer on failover — specifically what happens to my live cloud connections if Megaport's control plane or network goes down — because that's the actual risk”
    Senior Infrastructure Engineer, Cloud Services · 201-500 employeessimulated
    “the page gives me one customer anecdote, not a mechanism for why it's faster than what Cisco or the cloud providers' native interconnect already does”
    Senior Infrastructure Engineer, Cloud Services · 201-500 employeessimulated
    “A verified, like-for-like provisioning time comparison for my actual regions — e.g. "new cross-connect to AWS Singapore: 3 days vs. your current 6 weeks"”
    VP of Infrastructure, IT Services · 501-1000 employeessimulated

  • The NXP deployment-time case study is the proof point that lands

    3 of 15 · what worked

    “provisioning time and vendor sprawl: instead of raising a ticket with Juniper-based carriers and waiting weeks for cross-connects or new circuits to a cloud or data center, I'd…” Show full quote
    “provisioning time and vendor sprawl: instead of raising a ticket with Juniper-based carriers and waiting weeks for cross-connects or new circuits to a cloud or data center, I'd be doing it through one console in days, across 410+ providers”
    VP of Infrastructure, IT Services · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    See all 2 comments
    “If it actually works like NXP's "half a year to a week" or Framestore's "we have Megaport, it's done" — that's deployment time for new cloud connections or…” Show full quote
    “If it actually works like NXP's "half a year to a week" or Framestore's "we have Megaport, it's done" — that's deployment time for new cloud connections or sites collapsing from a procurement/carrier-provisioning cycle to self-service. That's a real line item for my team, since we're explicitly trying to cut infrastructure deployment time right now.”
    Head of IT Operations, Telecommunications · 1001-5000 employeessimulated

Brand alignment

  • Space and boardroom metaphors read as mismatched to an infrastructure buyer

    5 of 15

    “The tone is aimed at someone like me in parts — "Mission control for your entire stack," the compute/network/storage split, the customer quotes about provisioning speed — but…” Show full quote
    “The tone is aimed at someone like me in parts — "Mission control for your entire stack," the compute/network/storage split, the customer quotes about provisioning speed — but it's still marketing-first: "Ready for liftoff"”
    Senior Infrastructure Engineer, Cloud Services · 201-500 employeessimulated
    See all 5 comments
    “"Mission control for your entire stack" and "Trusted by globally recognized businesses" — that's not written for me, that's written for a boardroom slide”
    VP of Infrastructure, Telecommunications · 5000+ employeessimulated
    “"Mission control for your entire stack" and "Ready for liftoff" is trying a bit too hard to be punchy/aspirational for an audience that's more interested in uptime and…” Show full quote
    “"Mission control for your entire stack" and "Ready for liftoff" is trying a bit too hard to be punchy/aspirational for an audience that's more interested in uptime and procurement cycles than space metaphors”
    Infrastructure Leader, Enterprise Software · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    “the top half with "Mission control for your entire stack" and "Ready for liftoff" is marketing fluff aimed at a broader exec audience, not infra engineers”
    Cloud Infrastructure Manager, IT Services · 5000+ employeessimulated
    “it feels like two different writers — one who's talked to actual network engineers and one doing generic SaaS positioning.”
    Network Infrastructure Director, Enterprise Software · 201-500 employeessimulated
05

How this works

Who we simulated (15 personas)

15 AI-simulated personas matched to your target market. Each answered independently, without seeing your goal, the scoring criteria, or each other’s answers. Attribution is role, industry and company size only.

Cloud Infrastructure ManagerEnterprise Software · 5000+ employeesUS
Senior Infrastructure EngineerCloud Services · 201-500 employeesEU
VP of InfrastructureIT Services · 501-1000 employeesAPAC
Head of IT OperationsTelecommunications · 1001-5000 employeesUS
Infrastructure LeaderData Centers · 5000+ employeesEU
Network Infrastructure DirectorEnterprise Software · 201-500 employeesAPAC
Cloud Infrastructure ManagerCloud Services · 501-1000 employeesUS
Senior Infrastructure EngineerIT Services · 1001-5000 employeesEU
VP of InfrastructureTelecommunications · 5000+ employeesAPAC
Head of IT OperationsData Centers · 201-500 employeesUS
Infrastructure LeaderEnterprise Software · 501-1000 employeesEU
Network Infrastructure DirectorCloud Services · 1001-5000 employeesAPAC
Cloud Infrastructure ManagerIT Services · 5000+ employeesUS
Senior Infrastructure EngineerTelecommunications · 201-500 employeesEU
VP of InfrastructureData Centers · 501-1000 employeesAPAC
Methodology

Every answer on this page was written by an AI model role-playing a buyer profile, scored on Wynter’s B2B Message Layers framework. The personas were sampled in code across role, industry, company size and behavioral traits; the model wrote only the answers. Scores arrive through fixed verdict categories and the counts are computed in our own code, so no number here was written by a model.

Score details: the count and the strength

The count is how many personas cleared the bar on each question. A yes can be unhesitating or come with reservations; the scorecard counts both as a yes, and this is the only place the difference is shown. Per layer:

  • Clarity: 1 of 15, all with reservations
  • Relevance: 8 of 15, all with reservations
  • Value: 14 of 14, all with reservations
  • Differentiation: 8 of 15, all with reservations

These answers are AI-simulated and directional. Validate anything you’re betting on with real buyers, your ICPs.

Your next 3 moves

  1. 1.Rewrite the H1 to name what Megaport is: private network connectivity between clouds and data centers.
  2. 2.Replace "31+ Countries Connected" with a link to a region and location list.
  3. 3.Add a section comparing Megaport to carrier circuits and single-provider fabrics.

See what real buyers say.

A detailed, section-by-section message test report from verified B2B professionals who are actually in-market for what you sell.

Test with humans
Trusted by
HubSpotRingCentralShopifyCognismPaddleVeeamRipplingMiro
RetentionThis report is kept for 60 days, until 4 Dec 2026, then deleted along with the personas, their answers and everything derived from them. The link stays live for that whole period so it can be shared or revisited, and stops working afterwards.

The email address it was requested from is kept beyond that, because it subscribes you to the newsletter — that was the price of the report. You can unsubscribe in one click from any issue, which stops the email without affecting a report still inside its 60 days. The public report page never shows the requester’s address.