Message test · Digioh

12 of 15 buyers would take a meeting to learn more.

https://www.digioh.com/15 AI-simulated buyers

Your message lands: they know what it is, who it's for, why it's worth their time, and why to pick you.

Simulated responsesNo humans answered these questions. Every quote below was written by an AI model role-playing a buyer profile.
Saved report, kept for 60 days — expires in 60 days. Re-opening it is free.
01

Your verdict

  • Clarity

    Do they understand what you do?

    Strong15 of 15

    15 could name what kind of product this is, unprompted.

  • Relevance

    Can they tell what it solves, and who it's for?

    Strong15 of 15

    15 could quickly tell what problem it solves and who it is for.

  • Value

    Fix first

    Do they actually want it?

    Strong12 of 15

    12 would take a meeting to learn more.

  • Differentiation

    Is there a reason to pick you over the alternatives?

    Strong12 of 15

    12 could name a reason to pick you over a similar option.

See what they thought you were

Your page describes: onsite personalization. They said:

  • 2×Onsite personalization / pop-up & quiz platformmatches

13 couldn't name one; 2 got it right.

Four separate measures, not stages: all 15 personas answered all four questions. Each square is one persona.

Additional signalBrand alignment14 of 15StrongShow finding ▸

Fix "powerful on it's own" in the quiz-only section and cut "powerful" Not one of the four layers, and it does not affect the scores above or the order to fix them in.

These are 15 simulated buyers. Want 15 real ones?

Test with humans
02

Fix these first

Fix these first

Three edits, in the order that matters.

The first is on your weakest layer, the second on the next, the third on the layer the most buyers had a problem with. Each says what to change on the page and why, with one simulated answer behind it.

  1. Add methodology and sample line under the 25x ROI and 12% revenue stats

    Why: The "25x avg. return on investment" and "12% avg. incremental revenue" numbers sit with no baseline, timeframe or source, so readers discount them. Name how many brands, over what period, and against what baseline the figures were measured.

    8 of 15 raised this

    “The "25x ROI" and "12% incremental revenue" numbers have no methodology behind them so I'd ignore those until I saw a source.”
    Head of Marketing, Online retail · 11-50 employeessimulated
    Moves Value
    Proof next to the claim
  2. Explain under "Digioh Passport" how shoppers are matched without cookies

    Why: "Identifies shoppers beyond cookie limits" is repeated but never described, so a competitor that plainly states its method wins the comparison. Say what the match runs on, how long recognition lasts, and how consent is handled.

    1 of 15 raised this

    “The numbers (25x ROI, 12% incremental revenue, 46% AOV lift for Andie Swim) are what stick, but I'd still want to see the methodology behind those before I…” Show full quote
    “The numbers (25x ROI, 12% incremental revenue, 46% AOV lift for Andie Swim) are what stick, but I'd still want to see the methodology behind those before I believed the category needs to exist separately from what I could stitch together with Klaviyo + a quiz app.”
    Senior Marketing Manager, Direct-to-consumer retail · 201-500 employeessimulated
    Moves Differentiation
    Answer the live objection

Keep these · 3

These landed. Keep the wording when you edit around it.

  1. Keep · Relevance

    The headline and role-based navigation make the problem and audience obvious in seconds

    “the hero line "Capture the revenue your site is missing" plus the subhead about identifying shoppers and winning back drop-offs told me the problem (lost conversions/cart abandonment) in…” Show full quote
    “the hero line "Capture the revenue your site is missing" plus the subhead about identifying shoppers and winning back drop-offs told me the problem (lost conversions/cart abandonment) in the first few seconds”
    Head of Marketing, Online retail · 11-50 employeessimulated
  2. Keep · Differentiation

    Named case studies with hard numbers are the proof respondents believe

    “Andie Swim's "296% increase in onsite CVR" and "46% increase in AOV," RANAVAT's "16% of total online revenue driven by Digioh" — are the only things here that…” Show full quote
    “Andie Swim's "296% increase in onsite CVR" and "46% increase in AOV," RANAVAT's "16% of total online revenue driven by Digioh" — are the only things here that would actually move me versus a competitor, because they're tied to a real brand I can go verify”
    Head of Marketing, Online retail · 11-50 employeessimulated
  3. Keep · Clarity

    Respondents can restate the product as pop-ups and quizzes that identify shoppers and…

    “pop-ups and quizzes that identify shoppers (even without cookies) and then serve them tailored offers or product recommendations, feeding that data into your email/SMS tools like Klaviyo”
    Marketing Manager, Direct-to-consumer retail · 201-500 employeessimulated
03

All recommendations

Value

Strong12 of 15
Moves ValueSpecifics beat superlatives

Replace "increase in conversion rates" stat with a named brand's before-and-after result

Why: One stat has no number at all and the others are averages nobody can check. Swap in a named store of comparable size with its conversion rate before and after, and the window it covers.

8 of 15 raised this

“The "25x ROI" and "12% incremental revenue" numbers have no methodology behind them so I'd ignore those until I saw a source.”
Head of Marketing, Online retail · 11-50 employeessimulated
Moves ValueTie the feature to the outcome

Add a line under "Close the revenue gap" showing what lands in Klaviyo

Why: The page says data "flows into your ESP, SMS platform, and the rest of your stack" without saying what a marketer sees on the other end. Name the fields and segments pushed to Klaviyo and what a flow can do with them.

8 of 15 raised this

“The "25x ROI" and "12% incremental revenue" numbers have no methodology behind them so I'd ignore those until I saw a source.”
Head of Marketing, Online retail · 11-50 employeessimulated

Differentiation

Strong12 of 15
Moves DifferentiationGive a reason to choose you

Add a line stating why Digioh beats stitching a quiz app to Klaviyo

Why: Readers can assume a quiz app plus Klaviyo already covers this, and "Most tools do one thing and stop there" does not answer it. State what identity carried across sessions does that a quiz app and an ESP cannot do alone.

1 of 15 raised this

“The numbers (25x ROI, 12% incremental revenue, 46% AOV lift for Andie Swim) are what stick, but I'd still want to see the methodology behind those before I…” Show full quote
“The numbers (25x ROI, 12% incremental revenue, 46% AOV lift for Andie Swim) are what stick, but I'd still want to see the methodology behind those before I believed the category needs to exist separately from what I could stitch together with Klaviyo + a quiz app.”
Senior Marketing Manager, Direct-to-consumer retail · 201-500 employeessimulated
Moves DifferentiationProof next to the claim

Move the Klaviyo partner badge and a named case metric beside the hero claim

Why: The believable proof, attributed case studies and the Klaviyo partnership, sits far below the unsourced averages that readers hit first. Put one named brand result and the partner badge next to "Capture the revenue your site is missing."

1 of 15 raised this

“The numbers (25x ROI, 12% incremental revenue, 46% AOV lift for Andie Swim) are what stick, but I'd still want to see the methodology behind those before I…” Show full quote
“The numbers (25x ROI, 12% incremental revenue, 46% AOV lift for Andie Swim) are what stick, but I'd still want to see the methodology behind those before I believed the category needs to exist separately from what I could stitch together with Klaviyo + a quiz app.”
Senior Marketing Manager, Direct-to-consumer retail · 201-500 employeessimulated

Clarity

Strong15 of 15

No specific edits needed here — this layer held up.

Relevance

Strong15 of 15

No specific edits needed here — this layer held up.

Additional signal

Brand alignment

Strong14 of 15
Moves Brand alignmentSpecifics beat superlatives

Fix "powerful on it's own" in the quiz-only section and cut "powerful"

Why: A typo and a superlative in the same line undercut the credibility the case studies build. State what the quiz-only option includes instead.

04

Buyer evidence

Biggest risks

A deliberately adversarial read of the same answers. Each claim was checked back against what the personas said and dropped if nothing supported it.

  • high

    The page's central proof points are discounted on first read, so the quantified value case lands as advertising rather than evidence.

    Eight of 15 rejected the headline ROI and revenue stats for missing methodology, sources, baselines and timeframes, asking instead for before-and-after Klaviyo flow data from comparable brands.

  • high

    The one mechanism that could carry differentiation is left undescribed, so the differentiation rests on a badge rather than the technology.

    Five respondents said identity tracking is repeated but never explained technically, and only two named cookie-less recognition as a differentiator while three cited the Klaviyo partner badge.

  • high

    Unsourced numbers do not just fail to persuade — they actively undermine the product's reason to exist.

    A respondent moved from doubting the stats to doubting the category, saying the job could be stitched together from Klaviyo and a quiz app rather than bought as a standalone tool.

  • medium

    Comprehension is shallower than attention: people grasp who the page is for far more readily than what the product actually does.

    Ten respondents said the headline and role navigation name the problem and buyer in seconds, but only four could play the product back accurately as identity resolution feeding email and SMS.

  • medium

    The page's credibility is carried entirely by the case studies, making every other claim on the page dead weight.

    Five respondents said attributed case studies with hard numbers outweigh the unsourced top-line stats, while eight discounted those stats outright — the proof hierarchy is inverted relative to page prominence.

  • medium

    Even the strongest proof on the page does not close the sale without a demo.

    Of the five who credited the named case studies, two still wanted a live demo or methodology to fully verify, meaning the best-performing asset leaves verification unfinished.

Value

  • Top-line ROI and revenue numbers are read as unsourced and are discounted

    8 of 15

    “The "25x ROI" and "12% incremental revenue" numbers have no methodology behind them so I'd ignore those until I saw a source.”
    Head of Marketing, Online retail · 11-50 employeessimulated
    See all 8 comments
    “I've been burned by a similar tool before, so I'd want to see those numbers replicated for a brand like mine before I'd sit through a demo myself”
    Marketing Manager, Direct-to-consumer retail · 201-500 employeessimulated
    “The case studies have real names and numbers attached (Andie Swim's 296% CVR increase, Pressed Juicery's quote on CRM flywheel, RANAVAT's 16% of revenue) which is more than…” Show full quote
    “The case studies have real names and numbers attached (Andie Swim's 296% CVR increase, Pressed Juicery's quote on CRM flywheel, RANAVAT's 16% of revenue) which is more than most vendor pages give you, so that's not nothing. But the "25x avg ROI" and "12% incremental revenue" stats up top have no source or methodology, and that undercuts the credibility of the named case studies sitting right next to them.”
    Senior Marketing Manager, Online retail · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    “The numbers they throw out — 25x ROI, 12% incremental revenue, 46% AOV lift at Andie Swim — are the kind of thing that gets a meeting booked,…” Show full quote
    “The numbers they throw out — 25x ROI, 12% incremental revenue, 46% AOV lift at Andie Swim — are the kind of thing that gets a meeting booked, but they're aggregate and unsourced on methodology”
    Director of Marketing, Ecommerce · 1001-5000 employeessimulated
    “the Pressed Juicery and Andie Swim numbers (46% AOV, 296% CVR increase) are the kind of thing I'd want, but those are single-case stats with no baseline or…” Show full quote
    “the Pressed Juicery and Andie Swim numbers (46% AOV, 296% CVR increase) are the kind of thing I'd want, but those are single-case stats with no baseline or methodology, so they don't move me on their own”
    Head of Marketing, Direct-to-consumer retail · 1-10 employeessimulated
    “I'd want the Pressed Juicery and RANAVAT numbers broken down more specifically (timeframe, baseline traffic, whether "16% of total online revenue" is incremental or just attributed)”
    Marketing Specialist, Online retail · 11-50 employeessimulated
    “The numbers (25x ROI, 12% incremental revenue, 46% AOV lift for Andie Swim) are what stick, but I'd still want to see the methodology behind those before I…” Show full quote
    “The numbers (25x ROI, 12% incremental revenue, 46% AOV lift for Andie Swim) are what stick, but I'd still want to see the methodology behind those before I believed the category needs to exist separately from what I could stitch together with Klaviyo + a quiz app.”
    Senior Marketing Manager, Direct-to-consumer retail · 201-500 employeessimulated
    “the 25x ROI and 12% incremental revenue numbers on this page mean nothing to me without a source or a methodology. I'd take a meeting, but only to…” Show full quote
    “the 25x ROI and 12% incremental revenue numbers on this page mean nothing to me without a source or a methodology. I'd take a meeting, but only to get a straight, technical answer on how Passport actually re-identifies people”
    Marketing Manager, Ecommerce · 51-200 employeessimulated

Differentiation

  • One respondent questioned whether the category warrants a standalone tool

    1 of 15

    “The numbers (25x ROI, 12% incremental revenue, 46% AOV lift for Andie Swim) are what stick, but I'd still want to see the methodology behind those before I…” Show full quote
    “The numbers (25x ROI, 12% incremental revenue, 46% AOV lift for Andie Swim) are what stick, but I'd still want to see the methodology behind those before I believed the category needs to exist separately from what I could stitch together with Klaviyo + a quiz app.”
    Senior Marketing Manager, Direct-to-consumer retail · 201-500 employeessimulated
  • Named case studies with hard numbers are the proof respondents believe

    5 of 15 · what worked

    “Andie Swim's "296% increase in onsite CVR" and "46% increase in AOV," RANAVAT's "16% of total online revenue driven by Digioh" — are the only things here that…” Show full quote
    “Andie Swim's "296% increase in onsite CVR" and "46% increase in AOV," RANAVAT's "16% of total online revenue driven by Digioh" — are the only things here that would actually move me versus a competitor, because they're tied to a real brand I can go verify”
    Head of Marketing, Online retail · 11-50 employeessimulated
    See all 5 comments
    “The case studies with hard numbers (46% AOV increase, 296% CVR increase, 16% of total revenue) are specific enough to be worth a meeting, but I'd go in…” Show full quote
    “The case studies with hard numbers (46% AOV increase, 296% CVR increase, 16% of total revenue) are specific enough to be worth a meeting, but I'd go in wanting someone to actually show me the Passport identity mechanism live, not just hear "beyond cookie limits" again”
    Marketing Specialist, Ecommerce · 51-200 employeessimulated
    “The Klaviyo Technology Partner of the Year 2025 badge plus named case studies with hard numbers (Andie Swim's 296% CVR increase, RANAVAT's 16% of revenue) would actually tip…” Show full quote
    “The Klaviyo Technology Partner of the Year 2025 badge plus named case studies with hard numbers (Andie Swim's 296% CVR increase, RANAVAT's 16% of revenue) would actually tip me toward this one over a vaguer competitor”
    Marketing Manager, Direct-to-consumer retail · 201-500 employeessimulated
    “The thing that would actually move it up my shortlist is the Klaviyo Technology Partner of the Year 2025 badge plus the named case studies — Andie Swim's…” Show full quote
    “The thing that would actually move it up my shortlist is the Klaviyo Technology Partner of the Year 2025 badge plus the named case studies — Andie Swim's 296% CVR increase and Pressed Juicery's quote about the "CRM flywheel" are specific enough to go check with a reference call.”
    Senior Marketing Manager, Online retail · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    “The Klaviyo "Technology Partner of the Year Americas 2025" badge and the named case studies (Pressed Juicery, Andie Swim, RANAVAT with actual names and titles, not just logos)…” Show full quote
    “The Klaviyo "Technology Partner of the Year Americas 2025" badge and the named case studies (Pressed Juicery, Andie Swim, RANAVAT with actual names and titles, not just logos) would tip me toward shortlisting it over a faceless competitor — that's a real, checkable claim”
    Head of Marketing, Direct-to-consumer retail · 1-10 employeessimulated
  • The Klaviyo partner badge is read as third-party validation

    3 of 15 · what worked

    “The thing that would actually move it up my shortlist is the Klaviyo Technology Partner of the Year 2025 badge plus the named case studies — Andie Swim's…” Show full quote
    “The thing that would actually move it up my shortlist is the Klaviyo Technology Partner of the Year 2025 badge plus the named case studies — Andie Swim's 296% CVR increase and Pressed Juicery's quote about the "CRM flywheel" are specific enough to go check with a reference call.”
    Senior Marketing Manager, Online retail · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    See all 3 comments
    “The Klaviyo "Technology Partner of the Year Americas 2025" badge and the named case studies (Pressed Juicery, Andie Swim, RANAVAT with actual names and titles, not just logos)…” Show full quote
    “The Klaviyo "Technology Partner of the Year Americas 2025" badge and the named case studies (Pressed Juicery, Andie Swim, RANAVAT with actual names and titles, not just logos) would tip me toward shortlisting it over a faceless competitor — that's a real, checkable claim”
    Head of Marketing, Direct-to-consumer retail · 1-10 employeessimulated
    “The Klaviyo Technology Partner of the Year badge also carries real weight since Klaviyo is already core to my retention flow, so that's a point in Digioh's favor…” Show full quote
    “The Klaviyo Technology Partner of the Year badge also carries real weight since Klaviyo is already core to my retention flow, so that's a point in Digioh's favor over a tool with no named ESP credibility.”
    Marketing Specialist, Online retail · 11-50 employeessimulated
  • Cookie-less identity recognition is the one claim respondents name as a differentiator

    2 of 15 · what worked

    “The thing that would actually move it up my shortlist is the specific claim that Passport recognizes shoppers "even after cookies expire" — that's the one line that's…” Show full quote
    “The thing that would actually move it up my shortlist is the specific claim that Passport recognizes shoppers "even after cookies expire" — that's the one line that's directly solving my stated problem, not generic personalization fluff, and it's concrete enough to test against our own traffic.”
    Director of Marketing, Ecommerce · 1001-5000 employeessimulated
    See all 2 comments
    “The thing that would actually move the needle for me versus a competing pop-up/quiz tool is the "recognizes returning and anonymous shoppers... even after cookies expire" claim”
    Marketing Specialist, Online retail · 11-50 employeessimulated

Clarity

  • The identity-matching mechanism is never explained

    4 of 15

    “"identifies shoppers beyond cookie limits" is vague enough to mean anything from email-capture matching to something sketchier on privacy grounds”
    Head of Marketing, Online retail · 11-50 employeessimulated
    See all 4 comments
    “It's the phrase "identifies shoppers beyond cookie limits" — "beyond cookie limits" is doing a lot of work with zero mechanism behind it. Does that mean fingerprinting, email…” Show full quote
    “It's the phrase "identifies shoppers beyond cookie limits" — "beyond cookie limits" is doing a lot of work with zero mechanism behind it. Does that mean fingerprinting, email hashing, login matching, probabilistic matching? I had to re-read it twice looking for the actual method and it just wasn't there.”
    Marketing Specialist, Ecommerce · 51-200 employeessimulated
    “What would rule it out, or at least stall it, is that "identifies shoppers beyond cookie limits" line — it's repeated twice on the page with zero explanation…” Show full quote
    “What would rule it out, or at least stall it, is that "identifies shoppers beyond cookie limits" line — it's repeated twice on the page with zero explanation of the actual technical method (device fingerprinting? login matching? something else?), and if a competitor's page explained that mechanism plainly, they'd win the meeting slot instead.”
    Marketing Specialist, Ecommerce · 51-200 employeessimulated
    “"identifies" and "beyond cookie limits" are both doing heavy lifting with zero mechanism attached. Is it device fingerprinting, hashed email matching on login, probabilistic matching, something else?”
    Marketing Manager, Ecommerce · 51-200 employeessimulated
  • Respondents can restate the product as pop-ups and quizzes that identify shoppers and…

    4 of 15 · what worked

    “pop-ups and quizzes that identify shoppers (even without cookies) and then serve them tailored offers or product recommendations, feeding that data into your email/SMS tools like Klaviyo”
    Marketing Manager, Direct-to-consumer retail · 201-500 employeessimulated
    See all 4 comments
    “It's a pop-up/quiz builder with some "identity" tracking bolted on — basically on-site personalization software that tries to recognise returning shoppers past cookie limits and then serves them…” Show full quote
    “It's a pop-up/quiz builder with some "identity" tracking bolted on — basically on-site personalization software that tries to recognise returning shoppers past cookie limits and then serves them targeted pop-ups, quizzes, and offers”
    Head of Marketing, Direct-to-consumer retail · 1-10 employeessimulated
    “It's an onsite personalization platform for ecommerce — pop-ups and quizzes that capture shopper data, tied to an identity layer ("Passport") that recognizes returning visitors past cookie expiry,…” Show full quote
    “It's an onsite personalization platform for ecommerce — pop-ups and quizzes that capture shopper data, tied to an identity layer ("Passport") that recognizes returning visitors past cookie expiry, with an AI piece that builds/suggests the campaigns.”
    Senior Marketing Manager, Direct-to-consumer retail · 201-500 employeessimulated
    “Pop-ups and quizzes that ID shoppers and personalize onsite offers to recover lost sales.”
    Director of Marketing, Online retail · 501-1000 employeessimulated

Relevance

  • The headline and role-based navigation make the problem and audience obvious in seconds

    8 of 15 · what worked

    “the hero line "Capture the revenue your site is missing" plus the subhead about identifying shoppers and winning back drop-offs told me the problem (lost conversions/cart abandonment) in…” Show full quote
    “the hero line "Capture the revenue your site is missing" plus the subhead about identifying shoppers and winning back drop-offs told me the problem (lost conversions/cart abandonment) in the first few seconds”
    Head of Marketing, Online retail · 11-50 employeessimulated
    See all 5 comments
    “It was obvious fast: the headline "Capture the revenue your site is missing" plus the subhead about an AI agent finding "where they drop off and builds the…” Show full quote
    “It was obvious fast: the headline "Capture the revenue your site is missing" plus the subhead about an AI agent finding "where they drop off and builds the pop-ups, quizzes, and personalized experiences that win them back" tells you the problem (lost/abandoning shoppers, missing revenue) within the first screen.”
    Marketing Specialist, Ecommerce · 51-200 employeessimulated
    “The reader segments are also spelled out explicitly with named tabs — Ecomm Managers, Retention Marketers, Acquisition Teams, Agencies — so I didn't have to infer who it's…” Show full quote
    “The reader segments are also spelled out explicitly with named tabs — Ecomm Managers, Retention Marketers, Acquisition Teams, Agencies — so I didn't have to infer who it's for, they just told me.”
    Senior Marketing Manager, Online retail · 501-1000 employeessimulated
    “the headline "Capture the revenue your site is missing" plus the subline about identifying shoppers and winning back drop-offs tells you the problem (lost conversions/revenue leakage) in the…” Show full quote
    “the headline "Capture the revenue your site is missing" plus the subline about identifying shoppers and winning back drop-offs tells you the problem (lost conversions/revenue leakage) in the first few seconds”
    Head of Marketing, Direct-to-consumer retail · 1-10 employeessimulated
    “the core pitch — lost/anonymous shoppers, drop-off, recovering revenue — is obvious within the first screen, I didn't have to dig. The reader, though, is split into four…” Show full quote
    “the core pitch — lost/anonymous shoppers, drop-off, recovering revenue — is obvious within the first screen, I didn't have to dig. The reader, though, is split into four tabs — Ecomm Managers, Retention Marketers, Acquisition Teams, Agencies — so it's not one clean persona”
    Marketing Manager, Ecommerce · 51-200 employeessimulated
05

How this works

Who we simulated (15 personas)

15 AI-simulated personas matched to your target market. Each answered independently, without seeing your goal, the scoring criteria, or each other’s answers. Attribution is role, industry and company size only.

Head of MarketingOnline retail · 11-50 employeesUS
Marketing SpecialistEcommerce · 51-200 employeesEU
Marketing ManagerDirect-to-consumer retail · 201-500 employeesUS
Senior Marketing ManagerOnline retail · 501-1000 employeesEU
Director of MarketingEcommerce · 1001-5000 employeesUS
Head of MarketingDirect-to-consumer retail · 1-10 employeesEU
Marketing SpecialistOnline retail · 11-50 employeesUS
Marketing ManagerEcommerce · 51-200 employeesEU
Senior Marketing ManagerDirect-to-consumer retail · 201-500 employeesUS
Director of MarketingOnline retail · 501-1000 employeesEU
Head of MarketingEcommerce · 1001-5000 employeesUS
Marketing SpecialistDirect-to-consumer retail · 1-10 employeesEU
Marketing ManagerOnline retail · 11-50 employeesUS
Senior Marketing ManagerEcommerce · 51-200 employeesEU
Director of MarketingDirect-to-consumer retail · 201-500 employeesUS
Methodology

Every answer on this page was written by an AI model role-playing a buyer profile, scored on Wynter’s B2B Message Layers framework. The personas were sampled in code across role, industry, company size and behavioral traits; the model wrote only the answers. Scores arrive through fixed verdict categories and the counts are computed in our own code, so no number here was written by a model.

Score details: the count and the strength

The count is how many personas cleared the bar on each question. A yes can be unhesitating or come with reservations; the scorecard counts both as a yes, and this is the only place the difference is shown. Per layer:

  • Clarity: 15 of 15, all with reservations
  • Relevance: 15 of 15, 10 without hesitation, 5 with reservations
  • Value: 12 of 15, all with reservations
  • Differentiation: 12 of 15, all with reservations

These answers are AI-simulated and directional. Validate anything you’re betting on with real buyers, your ICPs.

Your next 3 moves

  1. 1.Add methodology and sample line under the 25x ROI and 12% revenue stats
  2. 2.Explain under "Digioh Passport" how shoppers are matched without cookies

See what real buyers say.

A detailed, section-by-section message test report from verified B2B professionals who are actually in-market for what you sell.

Test with humans
Trusted by
HubSpotRingCentralShopifyCognismPaddleVeeamRipplingMiro
RetentionThis report is kept for 60 days, until 5 Dec 2026, then deleted along with the personas, their answers and everything derived from them. The link stays live for that whole period so it can be shared or revisited, and stops working afterwards.

The email address it was requested from is kept beyond that, because it subscribes you to the newsletter — that was the price of the report. You can unsubscribe in one click from any issue, which stops the email without affecting a report still inside its 60 days. The public report page never shows the requester’s address.