Your page scores 51 out of 100 for sameness against the 3 competitors you named.

Claims only you make, that buyers weigh, and that competitors can’t easily copy.

Territory you spend prominent space on that the set also occupies. Not every line is one to delete — the question is whether it has earned the space, or whether something only you can say should be there instead.

• Commodity · 100%Table stakesHero

  clarity and real needs over generic solutions

  • “Menos confusão, mais clareza.”

  Skave, Milan Design Studio and Duck Design Studio all cover this territory. Buyers may need to hear it, but in your hero it spends the first impression on shared ground. Nobody else uses your exact words, but everyone is on the ground. Nobody else makes this exact claim, but everyone occupies the territory — lead with the specific, not the generic.

  This is grouped wrong
  They say

  • Skave“building solutions around the business's real needs”
  • Milan Design Studio“Criamos experiências digitais para marcas que se recusam a ser mais uma”
  • Duck Design Studio“imergir completamente nas suas necessidades e criar uma solução que seja um game-changer na história da sua empresa”
• Commodity · 67%Table stakesSection

  diagnostic research, audit and benchmarking

  • “Consultoria Tríplice Força: descobrimos os gargalos de crescimento e construimos a fundação sólida necessária”

  Common ground with Skave and Duck Design Studio. Say it if buyers need it — lower on the page, where it is not the thing they read first. Nobody else uses your exact words, but everyone is on the ground. Nobody else makes this exact claim, but everyone occupies the territory — lead with the specific, not the generic.

  This is grouped wrong
  They say

  • Skave“Online research and analysis”
  • Duck Design Studio“Entrevistas, análises e levantamento quantitativo das informações”
• Commodity · 67%Table stakesSection

  strategy drives design, not aesthetics alone

  • “A fundação do negócio vem da clareza do por que existe, para quem e o que transforma”

  Milan Design Studio and Duck Design Studio make the same claim (67% of the set). It cannot set you apart, so it should not carry the section.

  This is grouped wrong
  They say

  • Milan Design Studio“Cada projeto começa pelo que torna seu negócio único e transforma esse diferencial em uma experiência digital pensada para pessoas, buscadores e inteligência…”
  • Duck Design Studio“A parte científica envolve principalmente a contextualização do problema a ser resolvido e a descoberta de potenciais soluções a partir do método científico”
• Contested · 33%SharpenHero

  drives conversion, retention and revenue

  • “construímos da estratégia à experiência digital que converte vendas, gera satisfação e retém clientes”

  Milan Design Studio is on this territory too (33% of the set). It narrows the field without winning it — make it specific enough that it cannot be said of them.

  This is grouped wrong
  They say

  • Milan Design Studio“Sites que fazem sua marca ser encontrada, entendida e escolhida”
• Contested · 33%SharpenSection

  defined engagement format and scope

  • “(Re)posicionamento de Site ou SaaS: Projetos de escopo fechado que materializam o posicionamento em Site ou Produto para atuarem como motor de vendas e…”
  • “...mais do que um parceiro operacional, o Studio Akaishi participou ativamente da transformação digital da harpix”
  • “DEX Partner: Parceria contínua com operação total da Tríplice Força no seu negócio mês a mês”

  You say this 3 different ways.

  Shared with Skave. Sharpen it to the thing only you do here, or it reads as a claim any of you could make.

  This is grouped wrong
  They say

  • Skave“We think like strategic partners, build like specialists, and evolve as part of the team.”
• Contested · 33%SharpenSection

  full-service partner covering everything needed

  • “tudo o que um negócio early stage precisa para ser percebido do jeito que merece”

  Skave is on this territory too (33% of the set). It narrows the field without winning it — make it specific enough that it cannot be said of them. Nobody else uses your exact words, but everyone is on the ground. Nobody else makes this exact claim, but everyone occupies the territory — lead with the specific, not the generic.

  This is grouped wrong
  They say

  • Skave“The strategic and technical Branding and Technology partner for digital businesses.”
• Contested · 33%KeepSection

  serves startups and digital businesses

  • “Atendemos startups B2B early stage com problemas de posicionamento, comunicação ou experiência digital”

  Skave say what they are and who they are for, as every page in a category must. Keep it — it is orientation, not differentiation. Nobody else uses your exact words, but everyone is on the ground. Nobody else makes this exact claim, but everyone occupies the territory — lead with the specific, not the generic.

  This is grouped wrong
  They say

  • Skave“for digital businesses”

Sameness measures how much your claims overlap with the sites compared. It does not measure message quality or whether buyers prefer you.

AI-analyzed: an AI read each page on its own and grouped the claims that say the same thing. No score here was written by a model — every number is computed from those groupings in our own code, with the weights below.

Trusted by