Your verdict
Your page is half shared.
About half of what your page says, Domotz also says. You're less same than 3 of the 8 IT service management sites scored (category avg 57).
Each named site is scored the same way, against the other 4 in this set, so its tick means the same as your marker. The dashed line is the frozen benchmark average.
More same than average
The average IT service management category leader scores 57; you scored 58.
You are 1 point more same than the average IT service management category leader.
Closest overlap: Domotz
Of the 4 sites you named, Domotz echoes the most of what your page says. Scored the same way against the rest of the set, Domotz sits at 58.
Domotz is the competitor you sound most like.
Room to own more
8% of your claim space is ownable: unique, relevant, and hard to copy.
8% is ownable, and every claim you own already leads.
The verdict is above. Everything you can act on opens with your code.
We emailed you a six-digit code; it is in the subject line. Enter it and four more sections unlock on this page, and the report link lands in your inbox so you can come back to it.
- Do this first — the three changes worth testing, with the claim quoted and the reason
- What you can own — the claims that are yours alone, and the ones buried in body copy
- Where you blend in — shared territory, with the competitors' exact wording beside yours
- Every claim on your page, with how common it is and whether a competitor could copy it
Three changes worth testing first.
Chosen by rule from the comparison with Domotz, Paessler PRTG, SolarWinds and LogicMonitor: the shared claim taking your most prominent space, then the claims only you make that sit too low on the page to be read. Confirm your email above and the claim and the reason appear on each one.
- Locked — enter your code to see the claim
The line from your page, who else says it, and what to do about it.
Table stakesMost of the set says this too. - Locked — enter your code to see the claim
The line from your page, who else says it, and what to do about it.
Table stakesMost of the set says this too.
Try these changes, then test them with real buyers.
This measures overlap. Whether buyers notice is a different question, and only they can answer it.
What you can own
Claims only you make, that buyers weigh, and that competitors can’t easily copy.
8% of your page’s claim space is yours to keep.
Why this is not 100 minus the Sameness Index
The index is a weighted composite across six categories, including page structure and visuals. This bar is measured on your claims alone, weighted by where each one sits on the page. Different denominators, so the two never add to 100 and are not meant to.
2 claims pass all three tests. Unlock to see them.
Where you blend in
12 prominent territories on your page are shared with the set, 7 of them by most of it. Unlock to see them with the competitors’ exact wording.
How this was calculated
Sameness measures how much your claims overlap with the sites compared. It does not measure message quality or whether buyers prefer you.
AI-analyzed: an AI read each page on its own and grouped the claims that say the same thing. No score here was written by a model — every number is computed from those groupings in our own code, with the weights below.
How the score is built
| Category | Weight | Yours | What a high score means |
|---|---|---|---|
Messaging Category framing, who it is for, and the outcome promised | 30% | 75 | The most expensive kind of sameness. A buyer cannot tell what job you do that the others do not. |
Claims Attribute and benefit claims — speed, ease, quality, ROI | 30% | 64 | Every shared claim is a line already read on another tab. Cut the ones nobody owns and spend the space on something they cannot. |
Features Capabilities and functions the page lists | 15% | 60 | Expected in a mature category, and the least alarming of the six. Feature parity is normal; leading with it is the mistake. |
Proof The kinds of evidence offered: customer logos, numbers, testimonials, case studies, badges | 10% | 20 | Same kinds of proof as everyone means the proof stops working as proof. It is scored on the kind of evidence, not on which customers are named. |
Structure Section order, navigation, CTA language and placement | 10% | 28 | The generic SaaS template — hero, logos, three-feature grid, testimonial, CTA. Familiar is not the same as memorable. |
Visual Palette family, imagery style, layout patterns | 5% | n/a | Weighted lowest on purpose: buyers rarely decide on this. Worth knowing, rarely worth fixing first. |
Each site was read on its own first, with no knowledge of the others, so your page gets no benefit of the doubt a competitor’s does not. A category nothing could be measured for drops out and the rest are re-weighted, rather than counted as zero.
What we compared (5 pages read)
What it cannot tell you
The index can find where two pages converge. It cannot say whether a buyer would notice, or which of your reasons to buy actually land. A single check also moves several points between runs, so read the band and the ranking, not the last digit.
Your highest-impact changes
- 1Table stakesYour hero copy says “automate tedious tasks with AI that knows your network”.
Domotz, Paessler PRTG, SolarWinds and LogicMonitor all say it too. Buyers may still need it, but shared ground cannot carry your hero — move it lower and give that space to something only you can say.
- 2Table stakesYour hero copy says “keep things running smoothly”.
Keep the fact, lose the position: domotz, SolarWinds and LogicMonitor say it too (75% of the set), and your hero is spending its first impression on the same territory as theirs.
- 3Table stakesYour hero copy says “80,000+ IT pros and MSPs manage their networks with Auvik”.
This is the set's common ground — Domotz, SolarWinds and LogicMonitor say it too (75% of the set). It will not set you apart wherever it sits, and in the hero it costs you the one place a distinctive claim would be read.
- 4Table stakesYour hero copy says “Gain real-time visibility across your network in minutes”.
A buyer with three tabs open reads a version of this on every one of them. Say it further down for the readers who need it; the hero should carry a claim they will only find here.
- 5Table stakesYour hero copy says “fix issues faster”.
True of you and true of them: Domotz, SolarWinds and LogicMonitor say it too (75% of the set). That is why it decides nothing, and why the hero is the wrong place to spend it.
- 6Table stakesYour section copy says “AI-guided troubleshooting analyzes your network data to identify likely root causes and recommend where to in…”.
In the section: True of you and true of them: Domotz, Paessler PRTG, SolarWinds and LogicMonitor all say it too. That is why it decides nothing, and why the section is the wrong place to spend it.
- 7Table stakesYour section copy says “Cloud-based deployment takes minutes, not days”.
In the section: Keep the fact, lose the position: domotz, Paessler PRTG and SolarWinds say it too (75% of the set), and your section is spending its first impression on the same territory as theirs.
- 8Table stakesYour section copy says “Catch issues as they happen and prevent disruptive downtime”.
In the section: Domotz, SolarWinds and LogicMonitor say it too (75% of the set). Buyers may still need it, but shared ground cannot carry your section — move it lower and give that space to something only you can say.
The only way to know if it matters.
This report can tell you where your messaging overlaps. It cannot tell you whether a buyer would care, or which of your reasons to buy actually land. Put the page in front of real B2B buyers in your target market and ask them.
