Your page scores 45 out of 100 for sameness against the 4 competitors you named.

Claims only you make, that buyers weigh, and that competitors can’t easily copy.

Territory you spend prominent space on that the set also occupies. Not every line is one to delete — the question is whether it has earned the space, or whether something only you can say should be there instead.

• Commodity · 75%Table stakesHero

  grows revenue and customers from ads

  • “Profitabler wachsen als etabliertes E-Commerce Unternehmen = Traffic × Conversion × Tracking”
  • “Starke Ergebnisse im Mittelstand”

  You say this 2 different ways.

  Smarketer, adseed and ECOM HOUSE cover this territory. Buyers may need to hear it, but in your hero it spends the first impression on shared ground.

  This is grouped wrong
  They say

  • Smarketer“Mehr Umsatz, Kunden oder Reichweite mit Google Ads und Microsoft Advertising”
  • adseed“Mehr Neukunden mit SEA, Social Ads & adseed”
  • ECOM HOUSE“Inspirierende Case Studies von Onlinehändlern, die ihr Wachstum Plateau und Hindernisse gemeistert haben”
• Commodity · 75%Table stakesHero

  third-party recognition and platform certifications

  • “Top-15 unter 1.396 Google-Partnern im deutschsprachigen Raum”
  • “89 Kundenbewertungen, Sehr Gut, 100% Empfehlungen (ProvenExpert)”
  • “Google Partner Premier 2024 Badge”

  You say this 3 different ways.

  Common ground with Smarketer, adseed and ECOM HOUSE. Say it if buyers need it — lower on the page, where it is not the thing they read first.

  This is grouped wrong
  They say

  • Smarketer“Sehr gut! Basierend auf 69 Bewertungen.”
  • adseed“adseed ist Ihre zertifizierte Performance Marketing Agentur”
  • ECOM HOUSE“4.5 von 5 Sternen auf Trustpilot, 150 Bewertungen”
• Commodity · 75%Table stakesSection

  free tool, audit or training upfront

  • “Berechne dein Wachstums-Potenzial: bis zu +2.400.000€ jährlicher Mehrumsatz bei 20% Steigerung von Besuchervolumen und Conversion-Rate”

  Smarketer, adseed and Ecoza make the same claim (75% of the set). It cannot set you apart, so it should not carry the section. Nobody else uses your exact words, but everyone is on the ground. Nobody else makes this exact claim, but everyone occupies the territory — lead with the specific, not the generic.

  This is grouped wrong
  They say

  • Smarketer“Jetzt kostenlos und unverbindlich anfragen!”
  • adseed“Sichern Sie sich jetzt Ihre kostenfreie Account-Analyse!”
  • Ecoza“Kostenloses Videotraining für eCom Founder”
• Commodity · 75%Table stakesSection

  named customers and case studies as proof

  • “Brandible: Skalierung von 5 auf 70+ Mitarbeiter seit Start der Zusammenarbeit 2010”
  • “Electropapa: 600% Umsatzsteigerung durch die Synergie aus Google Ads und CRO”
  • “Urlaubsguru: 90 identifizierte Potenziale zur Verbesserung der User Experience”

  You say this 3 different ways.

  Smarketer, adseed and ECOM HOUSE make the same claim (75% of the set). It cannot set you apart, so it should not carry the section.

  This is grouped wrong
  They say

  • Smarketer“Erfolgreiche Kunden aus allen Branchen”
  • adseed“Wir kennen unterschiedliche Branchen und Geschäftsmodelle – von Food und Fashion, bis Finance und Media”
  • ECOM HOUSE“ECOM HOUSE wuchs in Rekordzeit auf über 30 Mitarbeiter”
• Commodity · 75%Table stakesSection

  reaches the right audience across the funnel

  • “Full-Funnel Werbekampagnen entlang der gesamten Customer-Journey liefern messbare Ergebnisse”

  A buyer comparing tabs sees this on Smarketer, adseed and ECOM HOUSE too (75% of the set). Yours earns nothing by repeating it up top; it can live lower down.

  This is grouped wrong
  They say

  • Smarketer“Mit Google Ads präsentieren Sie Ihre Marke, Dienstleistungen und Produkte immer den richtigen Kunden”
  • adseed“Mit Suchmaschinenwerbung erreichen Sie potenzielle Kunden genau im richtigen Moment”
  • ECOM HOUSE“einem ganzheitlichen Marketing Ansatz auf allen Kanälen”
• Contested · 50%SharpenSection

  structured, systematic methodology and testing

  • “8 Researchmethodiken reichern kontinuierlich das Wissen über Zielkunden an”
  • “Systematisches A/B Testing”

  You say this 2 different ways.

  Ecoza and ECOM HOUSE are on this territory too (50% of the set). It narrows the field without winning it — make it specific enough that it cannot be said of them. Nobody else uses your exact words, but everyone is on the ground. Nobody else makes this exact claim, but everyone occupies the territory — lead with the specific, not the generic.

  This is grouped wrong
  They say

  • Ecoza“Wie du mit 5 einfachen Säulen dein Umsatz-Plateau nachhaltig durchbrichst”
  • ECOM HOUSE“Brandscale Framework™ skalieren wir 8-stellige D2C Brands”
• Contested · 25%SharpenHero

  specialist focus on search advertising

  • “100% Fokus: Google & YouTube Ads mit psychologischer Website-Optimierung”

  Smarketer is on this territory too (25% of the set). It narrows the field without winning it — make it specific enough that it cannot be said of them.

  This is grouped wrong
  They say

  • Smarketer“Fokus auf Google & Microsoft Ads”
• Contested · 25%SharpenSection

  measurable, data-driven results not guesswork

  • “Systematische, datenbasierte Optimierung hebt dich von der Konkurrenz ab”
  • “Systematische Ergebnisse: Wir liefern keine leeren Versprechen, sondern messbare Resultate”

  You say this 2 different ways.

  Shared with adseed. Sharpen it to the thing only you do here, or it reads as a claim any of you could make.

  This is grouped wrong
  They say

  • adseed“Wir entwickeln datenbasierte Kampagnen für Google Ads, Microsoft Advertising und YouTube”
• Contested · 25%SharpenSection

  tracking, analytics and reporting capability

  • “Conversion-Tracking & Analytics als Basis für Datenanalysen und Algorithmen”

  Contested ground: adseed claim it as well. The version that wins names a mechanism, a number or a scope that theirs cannot match.

  This is grouped wrong
  They say

  • adseed“Von Tracking und Google Analytics 4 bis hin zu individuellen Dashboards schaffen wir Transparenz”

Sameness measures how much your claims overlap with the sites compared. It does not measure message quality or whether buyers prefer you.

AI-analyzed: an AI read each page on its own and grouped the claims that say the same thing. No score here was written by a model — every number is computed from those groupings in our own code, with the weights below.

Trusted by